Skip to main content

Unusual water transport properties of some traditional Scottish shale bricks

Abstract

Sorptivity, porosity and pore size distribution have been measured for five types of pressed fired-clay bricks recovered from a Second World War airfield in East Lothian, Scotland. It was found that the bricks, all manufactured locally from colliery shale, had similar porosities but significantly different compositions, leading to differences in pore structure and transport properties. Unusually high concentrations of organic carbon were found by analysis. In imbibition tests using water and n-decane, capillary absorption generally did not scale with time1/2, indicating material non-uniformity in the flow direction. A sharp front n-layer model was used to estimate the variation of sorptivity and permeability in drilled cores taken through bed and stretcher faces. A surface skin of lower sorptivity was found in some materials. This is attributed to compression of the green clay in the brick mould during manufacture. Comparison of water and decane imbibition showed that water sorptivity is reduced throughout by partial wettability. This hydrophobicity of these shale bricks is tentatively related to their high organic carbon content, which is incompletely burned out during firing. We show how the partial wettability may be expressed in terms of a wetting index derived from imbibition data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. 1.

    Lawson EM, Nixon PJ (1978) A survey of the locations, disposal and prospective uses of the major industrial by-products and waste materials in Scotland. Current Paper 50/78, Building Research Eastablishment, Garston

  2. 2.

    Lawson EM, Nixon PJ (1979) Prospective uses of Scotland’s by-products. Ceram Ind J 88:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gutt W, Nixon PJ (1979) Use of waste materials in the construction industry. Mat Struct 12: 255–306

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Douglas GJ, Oglethorpe MK (1993) Brick, tile and fireclay industries in Scotland. Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, Edinburgh

  5. 5.

    British Geological Survey (2005) Brick clay. Mineral Planning Factsheet, BGS

  6. 6.

    Hall C (1996) Clay brick. In: Jackson N, Dhir RK (eds) Civil engineering materials, 5th edn. Palgrave, Basingstoke

  7. 7.

    Douglas GJ, Hume JR, Moir L, Oglethorpe MK (1985) A survey of Scottish brickmarks. Scottish Industrial Archaeology Survey, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

  8. 8.

    Haibin L, Zhenling L (2010) Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1331–1340

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hyun J-Y, Jeong S-B, Chae Y-B, Kim B-S (2006) Development of fired clay bricks by coal-preparation refuse. J Ceram Soc Jpn 114:404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hall C, Hoff WD (2012) Water transport in brick, stone and concrete, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, London

  11. 11.

    Hall C, Hoff WD (2007) Rising damp: capillary rise dynamics in walls. Proc R Soc A 463:1871–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hall C, Hamilton A, Hoff WD, Viles HA, Eklund JE (2011) Moisture dynamics of walls: response to microenvironment and climate change. Proc R Soc A 467:194–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Derluyn H, Janssen H, Carmeliet J (2011) Influence of the nature of interfaces on the capillary transport in layered materials. Constr Build Mater 25:3685–3693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2012) A simplified numerical model for rainwater runoff on building facades: possibilities and limitations. Build Environ 53:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Air Ministry (1997) The Royal Air Force builds for war: a history of design and construction in the RAF, 1935–1945. Stationery Office, London

  16. 16.

    Francis P (1996) British military airfield architecture. Patrick Stephens, Sparkford

  17. 17.

    http://www.penmorfa.com/bricks/scotland2.html. Accessed 19 July 2012

  18. 18.

    Gummerson RJ, Hall C, Hoff WD (1980) Water movement in porous building materials—II. Hydraulic suction and sorptivity of brick and other masonry materials. Build Environ 15:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dunham AC (1992) Developments in industrial mineralogy: I. The mineralogy of brick-making. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 49:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dunham AC, McKnight AS, Warren I (2001) Mineral assemblages formed in Oxford Clay fired under different time-temperature conditions with reference to brick manufacture. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 53:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nicholson PS, Ross WA (1970) Kinetics of oxidation of natural organic material in clays. J Am Ceram Soc 53:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Aligizaki KK (2006) Pore structure of cement-based materials. Taylor and Francis, London

  23. 23.

    Hall C, Hoff WD, Prout W (1992) Sorptivity–porosity relations in clay brick ceramic. Am Ceram Soc Bull 71:1112–1116

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hall C (2006) Anomalous diffusion in unsaturated flow—fact or fiction? Cem Concr Res 37:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hall C, Green K, Hoff WD, Wilson MA (1996) A sharp wet front analysis of capillary absorption into n-layer composite. J Phys D Appl Phys 29:2947–2950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Beltrán V, Escardino A, Feliu C, Rodrigo MD (1988) Liquid suction by porous ceramic materials. Br Ceram Trans J 87:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Beltrán V, Barba A, Jarque JC, Escardino A (1991) Liquid suction by porous ceramic materials: 3—Influence of the nature of the composition and the preparation method of the pressing powder. Br Ceram Trans J 90:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ioannou I, Hoff WD, Hall C (2004) On the role of organic adlayers in the anomalous water sorptivity of Lépine limestone. J Colloid Interface Sci 279:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Krakowiak KJ, Lourenço PB, Ulm F-J (2011) Multitechnique investigation of extruded clay brick microstructure. J Am Ceram Soc 94:3012–3022

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ince C, Carter MA, Wilson MA, El-Turki A, Ball RJ, Allen GC, Collier NC (2010) Analysis of the abstraction of water from freshly mixed jointing mortars in masonry construction. Mater Struct 43:985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Elert K, de la Torre MJ, Cazalla O, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2004) Influence of mineralogy and firing temperature on the porosity of bricks. J Eur Ceram Soc 24:547–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was undertaken as part of a PhD project (IMG) funded by the UK AHRC and EPSRC through the Science and Heritage programme.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Hamilton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, I.M., Hall, C. & Hamilton, A. Unusual water transport properties of some traditional Scottish shale bricks. Mater Struct 47, 1761–1771 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0149-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fired-clay brick
  • Sorptivity
  • Water flow in heterogeneous materials