Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of supplementary cementing materials on water retaining characteristics of hydrated lime and cement mortars in masonry construction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is an investigation of the possible role of supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) on the water retaining ability of hydrated lime (CL90) and Portland cement (PC) mortars. Desorptivity (R) defines the water retaining ability of mortars in the freshly-mixed wet state. Transfer sorptivity (A) defines the ability of the substrate to withdraw water from the wet mix. The time to dewater (t dw), is an expression derived from the sharp front theory, and enables calculation of the time taken for a wet mortar joint to be dewatered by an absorbent substrate. The results show that the very water retaining CL90 mortars become progressively more water releasing with increased volume fraction replacement levels of both ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash (FA). On the other hand, the very water releasing PC mortars become more water retaining with the addition of silica fume (SF). Results also show that transfer sorptivity increases as the volume fraction replacement levels of GGBS and FA increases in CL90 mortars and decreases with increased volume fraction replacement levels of SF in PC mortars. Since the time taken to dewater a mortar joint (t dw) is inversely proportional to the squared transfer sorptivity, t dw can be dramatically altered by the addition of SCMs in both CL90 and PC mortars. These parameters have important practical consequences, not only in the initial adhesion of the mortar to the substrate but also in the strength of the set material. The ability to manipulate the water retaining properties can also allow construction time to be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. API specification 10 (1998) American Petroleum Institute, Northwest, Washington, DC

  2. BSI (1997) Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates. Determination of particle size distribution. Sieving method. BS EN 933 Part 1

  3. BSI (1999) Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Bulk sampling of mortars and preparation of test mortars. BS EN 1015 Part 2

  4. BSI (2000) Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BS EN 197 Part 1

  5. BSI (2002) Aggregates for mortar. BS EN 13139

  6. BSI (2005) Fly ash for concrete. Definition, specifications and conformity criteria. BS EN 450 Part 1

  7. BSI (2006) Ground granulated blast furnace slag for use in concrete, mortar and grout. Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria. BS EN 15167 Part 1

  8. BSI (2009) Silica fume for concrete. Definitions, requirements and conformity criteria. BS EN 13263 Part 1

  9. BSI (2010) Building Lime. Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria. BS EN 459-1:2010

  10. Carter MA, Green KM, Wilson MA, Hoff WD (2003) Measurement of the water retentivity of cement mortars. Adv Cem Res 15(4):155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collier NC, Wilson MA, Carter MA, Hoff WD, Hall C, Ball RJ, El-Turki A, Allen GC (2007) Theoretical development and validation of a sharp front model of the dewatering of a slurry by an absorbent substrate. J Phys D 40(13):4049–4054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Domone P, Illston J (2010) Construction materials: their nature and behaviour, 4th edn. Taylor & Francis, London, Chap 3

  13. El-Turki A, Ball RJ, Carter MA, Wilson MA, Ince C, Allen GC (2010) Effect of dewatering on the strength of lime and cement mortars. J Am Ceram Soc 93(7):2074–2081

    Google Scholar 

  14. Green KM, Carter MA, Hoff WD, Wilson MA (1999) The effects of lime and admixtures on the water-retaining properties of cement mortars. Cem Concr Res 29(11):1743–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ince C, Carter M, Wilson M, El-Turki A, Ball R, Allen G, Collier N (2010) Analysis of the abstraction of water from freshly mixed jointing mortars in masonry construction. Mater Struct 43(7):985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ince C, Carter M, Wilson M, Collier N, El-Turki A, Ball R, Allen G (2011) Factors affecting the water retaining characteristics of lime and cement mortars in the freshly-mixed state. Mater Struct 44(2):509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall C, Hoff WD (2002) Water transport in brick, stone and concrete. Spoon Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Philip JR (1957) The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations. Soil Sci 84(3):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Ince.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ince, C., Ozturk, Y., Carter, M.A. et al. The influence of supplementary cementing materials on water retaining characteristics of hydrated lime and cement mortars in masonry construction. Mater Struct 47, 493–501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0074-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0074-9

Keywords

Navigation