Skip to main content
Log in

Strength and stress–strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional unstabilized adobe low-rise buildings are common in many Chinese small towns and villages. This paper presents a study on the uniaxial compressive strength and stress–strain behavior of traditional unstabilized adobe blocks and masonry prisms with various compositions. The adobe blocks were manually produced by Chinese traditional technique in various proportions of natural soil and sand. The influence of various proportions on unconfined compressive strength, dry density and initial tangent modulus are discussed. Following this, soil mortars in three different proportions were used to construct adobe masonry prisms, with the purposes of understanding the influence of mortar strength to block strength ratio on compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics. The result shows that the compressive strength, initial tangent modulus and Poisson’s ratio of prism are influenced by the ratio of mortar strength to block strength. In addition, tangent modulus and Poisson’s ratio increase with the ratio of stress to peak strength. It was also found that although coefficients of variation of experimental results are reduced by load–unload cycles, peak strains are largely increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binici H, Aksogan O, Shah T (2005) Investigation of fibre reinforced mud brick as a building material. Constr Build Mater 19:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendry AW (1981) Structural brickwork. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hendry AW (1990) Structural masonry. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jayasinghe C, Mallawaarachchi RS (2009) Flexural strength of compressed stabilized earth masonry materials. Mater Des 30:3859–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kouakou CH, Morel JC (2009) Strength and elasto-plastic properties of non-industrial building materials manufactured with clay as a natural binder. Appl Clay Sci 44:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McNary WS, Abrams DP (1985) Mechanics of masonry in compression. J Struct Eng 111(4):857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mesbah A, Morel JC, Walker P, Ghavami Kh (2004) Development of a direct tensile test for compacted earth blocks reinforced with natural fibers. J Mater Civ Eng 16(1):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morel JC, Pkla A, Walker P (2007) Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Constr Build Mater 21:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nogwi BA (1997) Improving the traditional earth construction: a case study of Botswana. Constr Build Mater 11:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piattoni Q, Quagliarini E, Lenci S (2011) Experimental analysis and modelling of the mechanical behavior of earthen bricks. Constr Build Mater 25:2067–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy VBV, Gupta A (2006) Strength and elastic properties of stabilized mud block masonry using cement-soil mortars. J Mater Civ Eng 16(5):472–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy VBV, Vyas UChV (2008) Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics of masonry. Mater Struct 41:1697–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy VBV, Richardson Lal, Nanjunda Rao KS (2009) Influence of joint thickness and mortar-block elastic properties on the strength and stresses developed in soil-cement block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 21(10):535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Savastano H Jr, Warden PG, Coutts RSP (2000) Brazilian waste fibers as reinforcement for cement-based composites. Cem Concr Compos 22:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vega P, Juan A, Guerra M (2011) Mechanical characterisation of traditional adobes from the north of Spain. Constr Build Mater 25:3020–3023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walker P (1995) Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilized soil blocks. Cem Concr Compos 17(4):301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker P (1999) Bond characteristics of earth block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 11(3):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker P (2004) Strength and erosion characteristics of earth blocks and earth block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 16(5):497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yetgin S, Cavdar O, Cavdar A (2008) The effects of fiber contents on the mechanical properties of the adobes. Constr Build Mater 22:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51121005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, F., Li, G., Li, HN. et al. Strength and stress–strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Mater Struct 46, 1449–1457 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y

Keywords

Navigation