Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of short duration NaCl exposure on the surface pore structure of concrete containing GGBFS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of chloride-binder interactions on the physical pore structure of concrete containing 0–60% ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as cement replacement. Physical and chemical chloride binder interaction was measured based on chloride binder isotherms. Physical chloride binder interaction was estimated to be the difference between the total binding capacity and chemically bound chloride. In this study it was assumed that the chemical binding is the binding capacity of the alumina phases which was estimated, using differential scanning calorimetry, as the area under the Friedel’s salt peaks. The assumption that chemical binding capacity is controlled by alumina phases is supported by multiple linear regression analysis that was conducted to assess the relationship between Fruendlich isotherm constants and the concrete’s chemical composition. To determine the effect physical and/or chemical chloride-binder interaction on the physical microstructure, paste samples were exposed to distilled water and 0.5 M NaCl solution for 6 h, and the total porosity and pore size distribution was evaluated using mercury intrusion porosimetry. Three key findings from this study are: (i) At a chloride concentration up to 0.5 M, and for mixtures containing 0 and 40% GGBFS the contribution of physically and chemically bound chloride are similar. (ii) At chloride concentrations greater than 0.5 M and less than 1 M, the total bound chloride is predominantly chemically bound for the 40% GGBFS mixture. (iii) Concrete specimens exposed to NaCl solution for 6 h exhibited different pore characteristics in comparison to concrete exposed to distilled water. The differences in the concrete microstructure are not linearly dependant on GGBFS content, but are found to be mutually influenced by the total bound chloride content, the percentage of chemically bound chlorides, and the pore size distribution of the mixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cyr M, Lawrence P, Ringot E (2006) Efficiency of mineral admixtures in mortars: quantification of the physical and chemical effects of fine admixtures in relation with compressive strength. Cem Concr Res 36:264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Copuroglu O (2006) Frost salt scaling of cement-based materials with a high slag content. Ph D Dissertation, Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands

  3. Chen W (2006) Hydration of slag cement: theory modeling and application. Ph D Dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands

  4. Lu X, Li C, Zhang H (2002) Relationship between the free and total chloride diffusivity in concrete. Cement Concr Res 32:323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ye G (2003) The microstructure and permeability of cementitious materials. Ph D Dissertation, Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands

  6. Luo R, Cai Y, Wang C, Huang X (2003) Study of chloride binding and diffusion in GGBS concrete. Cem Concr Res 33:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loser R, Lothenbach B, Leemann A, Tuchschmid M (2010) Chloride resistance of concrete and its binding capacity: comparison between experimental results and thermodynamic modeling. Cem Concr Compo 32:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ababneh A, Benboudjema F, Xi Y (2003) Chloride penetration in non-saturated concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 15:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boddy A, Bentz E, Thomas MDA, Hooton RD (1999) An overview and sensitivity study of a multimechanistic chloride transport model. Cem Concr Res 29:827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhir RK, Hewlett PC, Byars EA, Bai JP (1994) Estimating the durability of concrete in structures. Concrete 6:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kropp J, Hilsdorf, HK (1995) Performance criteria for concrete durability. Report 12, Rilem, Paris

  12. Martin-Perez B, Zibara H, Hooton RD, Thomas MDA (2000) A study of the effect of chloride binding on service life predictions. Cem Concr Res 30:1215–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandberg P (1999) Studies of chloride binding in concrete exposed in a marine environment. Cem Concr Res 29:473–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suryavanshi AK, Scantlebury JD, Lyon SB (1995) Mechanism of Friedel’s salt formation in cements rich in tri-calcium aluminate. Cem Concr Res 26(5):717–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chidiac SE, Panesar DK (2007) Sorptivity of concrete as an indicator of laboratory freeze-thaw scaling performance. International RILEM Workshop on Performance Based Evaluation and Indicators for Concrete Durability, Madrid, Spain, pp 59–66

  16. American Society for Testing and Materials (2004) Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic cement concretes’ ASTM C 1585-04

  17. Leemann A, Loser R, Trtik P, Munch B (2011) Blending of cements-influence on porosity and chloride resistance. First Middle East Conference on Smart Monitoring Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures. 8–10 February 2011, Dubai, UAE, p 8

  18. Suryavanshi AK, Swamy RN (1998) Influence of penetrating chlorides on the pore structure of structural concrete. Cem Concr Agg 20:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaudoin JJ, Ramachandran VS, Feldman RF (1990) Interaction of chloride and C–S–H. Cem Concr Res 20:875–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haque MN, Kayyali OA (1995) Free and water-soluble chloride in concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Balonis M, Lothenbach B, Le Saout G, Glasser FP (2010) Impact of chloride on the mineralogy of hydrated Portland cement systems. Cem Concr Res 40:1009–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang L, Nilsson L-O (1993) Chloride binding capacity and binding isotherms of OPC pastes and mortars. Cement Concr Res 23:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wowra O, Setzer MJ (1997) Sorption of chlorides on hydrated cement and C3S pastes. In: Setzer MJ, Auberg R (ed) Frost resistance of concrete E&FN Spon, London, pp 147–153

  24. Zibara H, Hooton RD, Yamada K, Thomas MDA (2002) Roles of cement mineral phases in chloride binding. Cem Sci Concr 56:384–391

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zibara H (2001) Binding of external chlorides by cement pastes, Ph D Dissertation, University of Toronto

  26. Ramachandran VS (1971) Possible states of chloride in the hydration of tricalcium silicate in the presence of calcium chloride. Mat Construc 4(19):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Delagrave A, Marchand J, Ollivier JP, Julien S, Hazrati K (1997) Chloride binding capacity of various hydrated cement paste systems. Adv Cem Based Mat 6:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGrath PF, Hooton, RD (1997) Influence of binder composition on chloride penetration resistance of concrete. Proceedings of the 4th CANMET/ACI International Conference SP170-15 Session: Durability of Concrete VI, Sydney, Australia, pp 331–347

  29. Tumidajski PJ, Chan GW (1996) Boltzmann-Matano analysis of chloride diffusion into blended cement concrete. J Mat Civ Eng 8:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suryavanshi AK, Scantlebury JD, Lyon SB (1995) The binding of chloride ions by sulphate resistant Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 25(3):581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Csizmadia J, Balazs G, Tamas FD (2001) Chloride ion binding of aluminoferrites. Cem Concr Res 31:577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arya C, Xu Y (1995) Effect of cement type on chloride binding and corrosion of steel in concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:893–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Panesar DK, Chidiac SE (2011) The effect of cold temperatures on the chloride binding capacity of cement. J Cold Regions Eng 25(4):133–145

    Google Scholar 

  34. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2004) Standard test method for determination of pore volume and pore volume distribution of soil and rock by mercury intrusion porosimetry ASTM D4404-84

  35. Kreijger PC (1984) The skin of concrete: composition and properties. Mater Struct Res Test 17(100):275–283

    Google Scholar 

  36. Long AE, Henderson GD, Montgomery FR (2001) Why assess the properties of near surface concrete? Constr Build Mater 15:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bentz DP, Clifton JR, Ferraris CF, Garboczi EJ (1999) Transport properties and durability of concrete: literature review and research plan NISTIR 6395. Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Maryland, USA

  38. Basheer PAM, Nolan E (2001) Near surface moisture gradients and in situ permeation tests. Cem Concr Res 15(2001):105–114

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jones MR, Macphee DE, Chudek JA, Hunter G, Lannegrand R, Talero R, Srimgeour SN (2003) Studies using 27Al MAS NMR of AFm and AFt phases and the formation of Friedel’s salt. Cem Concr Res 33:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Panesar DK, Chidiac SE (2009) Capillary suction model for characterizing salt scaling resistance of concrete containing GGBFS. Cem Concr Comp 31:570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sumranwanich T, Tangtermsirkul S (2004) A model for predicting time-dependent chloride binding capacity of cement-fly ash cementitious system. Mater Struct 37(6):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Glasser FP, Marchand J, Samson E (2008) Durability of concrete: degradation phenomena involving detrimental chemical reactions. Cem Concr Res 38:226–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuan Q, Shi C, De Schutter G, Audenaert K, Deng D (2009) Chloride binding of cement-based materials subjected to external chloride environment: a review. Const Build Mater 23:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study forms a part of ongoing research at The McMaster University’s Centre for Effective Design of Structures funded through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund. This research was also funded through grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Materials Manufacturing Ontario. The authors acknowledge that the SEM and BSE images were prepared by Dr. Liwu Mo, a post doctoral fellow at the University of Toronto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Walter G. Booth School of Engineering Practice, McMaster University, ETB 506, JHE 334, Hamilton, ON, L8S 0A3, Canada

    Samir E. Chidiac

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A4, Canada

    Daman K. Panesar

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 0A3, Canada

    Hassan Zibara

Authors
  1. Samir E. Chidiac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daman K. Panesar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hassan Zibara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daman K. Panesar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chidiac, S.E., Panesar, D.K. & Zibara, H. The effect of short duration NaCl exposure on the surface pore structure of concrete containing GGBFS. Mater Struct 45, 1245–1258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9831-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9831-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation