Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 1221–1232 | Cite as

Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete

  • T. T. LeEmail author
  • S. A. Austin
  • S. Lim
  • R. A. Buswell
  • A. G. F. Gibb
  • T. Thorpe
Original Article

Abstract

This paper presents the experimental results concerning the mix design and fresh properties of a high-performance fibre-reinforced fine-aggregate concrete for printing concrete. This concrete has been designed to be extruded through a nozzle to build layer-by-layer structural components. The printing process is a novel digitally controlled additive manufacturing method which can build architectural and structural components without formwork, unlike conventional concrete construction methods. The most critical fresh properties are shown to be extrudability and buildability, which have mutual relationships with workability and open time. These properties are significantly influenced by the mix proportions and the presence of superplasticiser, retarder, accelerator and polypropylene fibres. An optimum mix is identified and validated by the full-scale manufacture of a bench component.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Build Concrete Extrusion Open time Printing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project is funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK (EPSRC) Grant (EP/E002323/1) through the IMCRC at Loughborough University. The authors gratefully acknowledge the supply of materials from Weber (St Gobain), Hanson Cement, BASF and Grace Construction Products and the assistance in designing the freeform components from Foster + Partners and Buro Happold. The authors are also grateful for the laboratory assistance of John Webster, Jonathan Hales and David Spendlove.

References

  1. 1.
    Okamura H, Ouchi M (2003) Self-compacting concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 1:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    RILEM Technical Committee (2006) Final report of RILEM TC 188-CSC ‘Casting of self compacting concrete’. Mater Struct 39:937–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Austin SA, Robins P, Goodier CI (1999) The rheological performance of wet-process sprayed mortars. Mag Concr Res 51:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Austin SA, Robins P, Goodier CI (2002) Construction and repair with wet-process sprayed concrete and mortar. Technical Report 56. The Concrete Society UKGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buswell R, Soar RC, Gibb A, Thorpe T (2007) Freeform construction: mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Autom Constr 16:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim S, Le T, Webster J, Buswell R, Austin S, Gibb A, Thorpe T (2009) Fabricating construction components using layer manufacturing technology. Proc Int Conf Glob Innov Constr, Loughborough, pp 512–520Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Austin S, Robins P, Goodier CI (2005) Low-volume wet-process sprayed concrete: pumping and spraying. Mater Struct 38:229–237Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen S (2009) Flow conditions of fresh mortar and concrete in different pipes. Cem Concr Res 39:997–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mu B et al (1999) Cementitious composite manufactured by extrusion technique. Cem Concr Res 29:237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shao Y et al (2011) Microstructure of extruded cement-bonded fibreboard. Cem Concr Res 31:1153–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lombois-Burger H et al (2006) Kneading and extrusion of dense polymer–cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 36:2086–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tattersall GH, Banfill PFG (1983) The rheology of fresh concrete. Pitman Books Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    British Standards Institution (1990) BS 1377-9:1990 methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Previte RW (1977) Concrete slump loss. ACI Mater J 74:361–367Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ravina D et al (1994) Slump loss and compressive strength of concrete made with WRR and HRWR admixtures and subjected to prolonged mixing. Cem Concr Res 24:1455–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim BG, Jiang SP, Aitcin PC (2000) Slump improvement mechanism of alkalies in PNS superplasticized cement pastes. Mater Struct 33:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alhozaimy MA (2009) Effect of absorption of limestone aggregates on strength and slump loss of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 31:470–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Le T, Soutsos MN, Millard SG, Barnett SJ (2007) UHPFRC—optimisation of mix proportions. Proc Concr Platf Int Conf, Belfast, pp 339–348Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tarmac Limited (2007) CEMROK 40A—product informationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    British Standards Institution (2009) BS EN 12390-3:2009 testing hardened concrete. Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. T. Le
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. A. Austin
    • 1
  • S. Lim
    • 1
  • R. A. Buswell
    • 1
  • A. G. F. Gibb
    • 1
  • T. Thorpe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Building EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.National University of Civil Engineering (NUCE)HanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations