Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental results of fracture energy and fracture toughness of Radiata Pine laminated veneer lumber (LVL) in mode I (opening)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The load-carrying capacity of notched timber beams can be predicted using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). Material properties such as fracture toughness and energy are needed for the analysis. The micro and macroscopic complexity of wood and its anisotropic nature give different fracture properties in the longitudinal, radial and tangential grain directions. This complexity and the infrequent use of LEFM mean there is little data available. While wood is highly anisotropic, fracture analysis can use a subset of the possible material properties because wood normally cracks parallel to its grain due to its low tensile strength perpendicular to grain. This allows a significant reduction in the number of tests required to measure fracture properties, with considerable saving of resources. This paper presents the results of an experimental study investigating the fracture energy and fracture toughness of Radiata Pine laminated veneer lumber in mode I (opening). A more efficient test apparatus is proposed and shown to produce identical results to the test apparatus used by others. Results are presented for the fracture toughness properties in the grain direction, and include fifth percentiles and coefficients of variation. The influence that the specimen size has on the fracture toughness is also presented. Numerical analyses using the ABAQUS software package show good agreement with the experimental test results. The experimental results are within the range of experimental values reported in the literature for solid wood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardalany M, Deam B, Fragiacomo M (2010) Numerical investigation of the load carrying capacity of laminated veneer lumber joists with holes. Paper presented at the World Conference WCTE2010, Trentino

  2. ASTM (1990) Standard test method of test for plane strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. ASTM E399-83. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  3. ASTM D2915 (2003) Standard practice for evaluating allowable properties for grades of structural lumber. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi:10.1520/D2915-03

  4. Ballerini M, Bezzi R (2001) Numerical LEFM analyses for the evaluation of failure loads of beams loaded perpendicular to grain by single dowel connections. Paper presented at the CIB-W18 conference, Venice

  5. Ballerini M, Bezzi R (2007) Numerical LEFM analyses for the prediction of the splitting strength of beams loaded perpendicular-to-grain by dowel-type connections. J Mater Struc 40(1):139–149. doi:10.1617/s11527-006-9156-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan A (2007) Timber design guide, vol 3. 3rd edn. Timber Industry Inc, New Zealand

  7. Chen LS, Kuang JH (1993) A displacement extrapolation method for two dimensional mixed mode crack problems. J Eng Fract Mech 46(5):735–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frühmann K, Tschegg EK, Dai C, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2002) Fracture behaviour of laminated veneer lumber under Mode I and III loading. Wood Sci Technol 36(4):319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Green DW (2001) Wood: strength and stiffness. Encyclopaedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam

  10. Gustafsson P (1993) fracture mechanics models for strength analysis of timber beams with a hole or a notch: a report of RILEM TC-133: mean stress approach and initial crack approach (paper in report). Vol Report TVSM-7134 Lund University, Sweden

  11. Habbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen (2007a) ABAQUS, Theory Manual, Version 6.10. ABAQUS Inc, Pawtucket

  12. Habbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen (2007b) ABAQUS, User Manual, Version 6.10. ABAQUS Inc

  13. Henshell RD, Shaw KG (1975) Crack tip finite elements are unnecessary. Int J Numer Method Eng 9(3):495–507

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen J, Nakatani M, Quenneville P, Walford B (2010) A simple unified model for withdrawal of lag screws and glued-in rods. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 69(4):1–8. doi:10.1007/s00107-010-0478-y

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jernkvist LO (2001) Fracture of wood under mixed mode loading I. Derivation of fracture criteria. J Eng Fract Mech 68(5):549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen HJ, Gustafsson J (1990) Determination of fracture energy of wood for tension perpendicular to grain. Paper presented at the CIB-W18 on Timber Structures, Lisbon

  17. Le-Ngoc L, McCallion H (1997) On the fracture toughness of orthotropic materials. J Eng Fract Mech 58(4):355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pattonmallory M, Cramer SM (1987) Fracture-mechanics: a tool for predicting wood component strength. Forest Prod J 37(7–8):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Porteous J, Kermani A (2007) Structural timber design to Eurocode 5. Blackwell Pub., Oxford

  20. Rug W, Badstube M, Schone W (1990) Determination of fracture energy of wood for tension perpendicular to grain. Paper presented at the CIB-W18 on Timber Structures, Lisbon

  21. Schoenmakers D (2010) Fracture and failure mechanisms in timber loaded perpendicular to grain by mechanical connections. University of Eindhoven, Nether lands

    Google Scholar 

  22. Serrano E, Gustafsson P (2007) Fracture mechanics in timber engineering: strength analyses of components and joints. Mater Struct 40(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith I, Landis E, Gong M (2003) Fracture and fatigue in wood. Wiley, Chichester

  24. Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Tan D-M, Tschegg EK (1995) New splitting method for wood fracture characterization. Wood Sci Technol 29(1):31–50. doi:10.1007/bf00196930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suo Z, Bao G, Fan B (1992) Delamination R-curve phenomena due to damage. J Mech Phys Solids 40(1):1–16. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vasic S, Smith I (2002) Bridging crack model for fracture of wood. Eng Fract Mech 69:745–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vasic S, Smith I, Landis E (2002) Fracture zone characterization: micro-mechanical study. Wood Fiber Sci 34(1):42–56

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wu EM (1967) Application of fracture mechanics to anisotropic plates. J Appl Mech 34(4):967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to thank Warwick Banks from Carter Holt Harvey and Andrew Van Houtte from Nelson Pine for providing materials for the experimental program. The useful comments provided by Prof. Johan Per Gustaffson from Lund University, Sweden, Dr. Marco Ballerini from the University of Trento, Italy, and two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. The personal scholarship from the University of Canterbury, the project support provided by Prof. Andy Buchanan, and the technical support of laboratory technicians from the University of Canterbury, especially Mr. Alan Poynter, are all highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoochehr Ardalany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardalany, M., Deam, B. & Fragiacomo, M. Experimental results of fracture energy and fracture toughness of Radiata Pine laminated veneer lumber (LVL) in mode I (opening). Mater Struct 45, 1189–1205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9826-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9826-1

Keywords

Navigation