Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of moisture on the reliability of void detection in brickwork masonry using radar, ultrasonic and complex resistivity tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of moisture on the reliability of detection of larger voids in brickwork masonry was investigated using three non-destructive techniques: radar, ultrasonic and complex resistivity (CR). Radar and ultrasonic travel time tomography, as well as CR tomography, were performed over a specific cross section of a specimen containing a large void at a known position to determine the influence of different levels of moisture content in the brickwork on the wave velocities and the CR magnitude. We defined a numerical estimator to quantitatively determine the void detection efficiency from the images obtained when exposing the specimen to moisture. The results showed radar to be the most reliable technique for void detection in both dry and wet masonry, while CR performed much better in detecting larger air voids in wet masonry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binda L, Saisi A (2009) Application of NDTS to the diagnosis of historic structures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on NDT in civil engineering (NDTCE 2009), p 28

  2. Binda L, Lenzi G, Saisi A (1998) NDE of masonry structures: use of radar tests for the characterisation of stone masonries. NDT&E Int 31(6):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Binda L, Zanzi L, Lualdi M, Condoleo P (2003) Complementarity of non destructive techniques in the diagnosis of damaged historic structures. In: Proceedings of the international conference on structural faults and repair, p 9

  4. Binda L, Saisi A, Zanzi L (2003) Sonic tomography and flat-jack tests as complementary investigation procedures for the stone pillars of the temple of S. Nicolo l’Arena (Italy). NDT&E Int 36(4):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Binda L, Bosiljkov V, Saisi A, Zanzi L (2006) Guidelines for the diagnostic investigation of historic buildings. In: Proceedings of the 7th international masonry conference: London 2006 (Proceedings of the British Masonry Society, No. 10)

  6. Binda L, Lualdi M, Saisi A, Zanzi L (2011) Radar investigation as a complementary tool for the diagnosis of historic masonry buildings. Int J Mater Struct Integr 5(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Camplani M, Cannas B, Carcangiu S, Concu G, Fanni A, Montisci A, Mulas M (2008) Acoustic tomography for non destructive testing of stone masonry. In: Oea G (ed) ICCSA 2008, part II, LNCS 5073. Springer, Berlin, pp 596–605

  8. Colla C, Das P, McCann D, Forde M (1997) Sonic, electromagnetic and impulse radar investigation of stone masonry bridges. NDT&E Int 30(4):249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyer B, Worthington M (1988) Some sources of distortion in tomographic velocity images. Geophys Prospect 36(3):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flint R, Jackson P, McCann D (1999) Geophysical imaging inside masonry structures. NDT&E Int 32(8):469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Günther T, Rücker C (2008) WallBERT, Version 0.9. Benutzerhandbuch

  12. Jol H (ed) (2009) Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kong F, By TL (1995) Radar tomography for non-destructive testing. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on NDT in civil engineering (NDT-CE), Berlin, pp 681–688

  14. Kruschwitz S, Niederleithinger E, Trela C, Wöstmann J (2010) Complex resistivity and radar investigation of building material: first results of field scale measurements. Acta Geophys 58(1):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loke M (2011) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. p 148. http://www.geotomosoft.com. Accessed 7 April 2011

  16. Maeda N (1985) A method for reading and checking phase times in auto-processing system of seismic wave data. J Seismol Soc Jpn 38:365–379

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maierhofer C, Colla C (2000) Influence of moisture content on the detection of structural features in building construction using impulse radar. In: Alampali S (ed) Structural materials technology IV—an NDT conference. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, pp 343–349

  18. Maierhofer C, Leipold S (2001) Radar investigation of masonry structures. NDT&E Int 34(2):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maierhofer C, Roellig M (2009) Active thermography for the characterization of surfaces and interfaces of historic masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on NDT in civil engineering (NDTCE 2009), p 6

  20. Sadri A (2003) Application of impact-echo technique in diagnoses and repair of stone masonry structures. NDT&E Int 36(4):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandmeier K (2004) Reflexw, Version 3.5, instruction manual for processing of seismic, acoustic or electromagnetic reflection, refraction and transmission data

  22. Schuller M, Berra M, Atkinson R, Binda L (1997) Acoustic tomography for evaluation of unreinforced masonry. Constr Build Mater 11(3):199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schuster G (1996) Resolution limits for crosswell migration and traveltime tomography. Geophys J Int 127(2):427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tronicke J (2007) The influence of high frequency uncorrelated noise on first-break arrival times and crosshole traveltime tomography. J Environ Eng Geophys 12(2):173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tronicke J, Dietrich P, Appel E (2002) Quality improvement of crosshole georadar tomography: pre- and post-inversion data analysis strategies. Eur J Environ Eng Geophys 7:59–73

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tweeton D (2001) GEOTOMCG, instruction manual for the three dimensional tomography program

  27. Valle S, Zanzi L, Rocca F (1999) Radar tomography for NDT: comparison of techniques. J Appl Geophys 41(2–3):259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wendrich A, Trela C, Krause M, Maierhofer C, Effner U, Wöstmann J (2006) Location of voids in masonry structures by using radar and ultrasonic traveltime tomography. In: Proceedings of the 9th European NDT conference (ECNDT 2006), Berlin, vol 11, p 11

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Slovenian Research Agency through grant 1000-10-310156 and the Slovene Human Resources and Scholarship Fund through grant 11012-13/2011. The authors wish to thank Jens Wöstmann and Maria Grohmann for their help during the measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Cotic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotic, P., Jaglicic, Z., Niederleithinger, E. et al. Effect of moisture on the reliability of void detection in brickwork masonry using radar, ultrasonic and complex resistivity tomography. Mater Struct 46, 1723–1735 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-0011-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-0011-3

Keywords

Navigation