Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of physical, chemical and electro-kinetic properties of pumice on strength development of pumice blended cements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, the potential effects of physical, chemical and electro-kinetic properties of pumice on the strength development of pumice blended cements (PBC) were examined and documented. A significant relationship between zeta potential of pumice samples, setting time and water demand of PBC was found. A relationship between the chemical content of pumice samples and compressive strength of PBC was also observed. However, zeta potential of the pumice samples was found to be less effective in strength development. Despite the lower clinker content, the setting time of the PBC samples was shorter than control specimen. 30 % pumice replacement by clinker resulted in 5–28 % reduction in 28-day strength depending on the characteristics of the pumice samples and grinding time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander KM, Davis CES (1960) Effect of alkali on the strength of Portland cement paste. Aust J Appl Sci 11:146–156

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anwar Hossain KM (2004) Properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM C618 (2003) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. American society for testing and materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  4. Blanco Varela MT, Martínez Ramírez S, Ereña I, Gener M, Carmona P (2006) Characterization and pozzolanicity of zeolitic rocks from two cuban deposits. Appl Clay Sci 33:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter DL, Mortland MM, Kemper WD (1986) Methods of soil analysis, Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods—Agronomy monograph no. 9, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy—Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA

  6. Depci T, Efe T, Tapan M, Özvan A, Açlan M, Uner T (2012) Chemical characterization of Patnos Scoria (Ağrı, Turkey) and its usability for production of blended cement. Physicochem Probl Min Process 48(1):303–315

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ersoy B, Sariisik A, Dikmen S, Sariisik G (2010) Characterization of acidic pumice and determination of its electrokinetic properties in water. Powder Technol 197:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodne H, Saasen A (2000) The effect of the cement zeta potential and slurry conductivity on the consistency of oil-well cement slurries. Cem Concr Res 30:1767–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter RJ (1993) Foundations of colloid science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press Inc., San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kazuhiro Y, Ei-ichi T, Kenji K, Tomoyuki E (2002) Adsorption characteristics of superplasticizers on cement component minerals. Cem Concr Res 32:1507–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lea FM (1976) The chemistry of cement and concrete. Edward Arnold Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lyklema J (1991) Fundamentals of interface and colloid science. Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. Massazza F (1998) Pozzolana and pozzolanic cements. In: Hewlett PC (ed) Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete, 4th edn. Elsevier, London

  15. Neubauer CM, Yang M, Jennings HM (1998) Interparticle potential and sedimentation behavior of cement suspensions: effects of admixtures. Adv Cem Based Mater 8:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozvan A, Tapan M, Erik O, Efe T, Depci T (2012) Compressive strength of scoria added Portland cement concretes. Gazi Univ J Sci 25(3):769–775

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pan S, Tseng D, Lee CC, Lee C (2003) Influence of the fineness of sewage sludge ash on the mortar properties. Cem Concr Res 33:1749–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perraki Th, Orfanoudaki A (2004) Study of thermally treated kaolinite. Miner Wealth 130:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. Plank J, Hirsch C (2007) Impact of zeta potential of early cement hydration phases on superplasticizer adsorption. Cem Concr Res 37:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poon CS, Lam L, Kou SC, Lin ZS (1999) A study on the hydration rate of natural zeolite blended cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 13:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabir B, Wild S, Bai J (2001) Metacaolin and calcined clays as pozzolan for concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 23:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sersale R, Frigione G (1985) Natural zeolites as constituents of blended cements. La Chimica e l’industria 67:177–180

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shannag M (2000) High strenght concrete containing natural pozzolan and silica fume. Cem Concr Compos 22:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shayan II (1989) Influence of NaOH on mechanical properties of cement paste and mortar with and without reactive aggregate. In: 8th international conference on alkali—aggregate reaction. Society of Materials Sciences, Kyoto, Japan, pp 715–720

  25. Taşkın C (1977) Van-Ağrı illeri yörelerinde bazı pomza (bims) zuhurlarının araştırılması hakkında rapor. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Endüstriyel Hammaddeler Daire Başkanlığı Yapı Taşları ve Malzemeleri Servisi, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tavare NS, Garside J (1982) The characterization of growth dispersion. Industrial crystallization. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  27. TS EN 196-1 (2009) Methods of testing cement—Part 1: determination of strength. Tuskish Standards Institutions, TSE, Ankara (in Turkish)

  28. TS EN 196-3 (2002) Methods of testing cement-Part 3: Determination of setting time and soundness. Turkish Standards Institution, TSE, Ankara (in Turkish)

  29. TS EN 196-6 (2000) Methods of testing cement-Part 3: determination of fineness. Turkish Standards, TSE, Ankara (in Turkish)

  30. TS EN 197-1 (2002) Cement-Part 1: Compositions and conformity criteria for common cements. Turkish Standards Institution, TSE, Ankara (in Turkish)

  31. TS EN 197-2 (2002) Cement-Part 2: Conformity evaluation. Turkish Standards Institution, TSE, Ankara (in Turkish)

  32. Tunç S, Duman O (2009) Effects of electrolytes on the electrokinetic properties of pumice suspensions. J Dispers Sci Technol 30:548–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker R, Pavía S (2010) Effect of pozzolan properties on the properties of building composites. In: Ní Nualláin NA, Walsh D, West R, Cannon E, Caprani C, McCabe B (eds) BCRI Bridge Infrastructure Concrete Research Ireland University of Cork

  34. Yilmaz B (2009) Effects of molecular and electrokinetic properties of pozzolans on hydration. ACI Mater J 106:128–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially funded by Yuzuncu Yil University (Project Number: 2010-FBE-YL107). The authors would like to thank to Quality Control Team of Askale Van Cement Factory, for their contributions in performing standard cement tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mücip Tapan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tapan, M., Depci, T., Özvan, A. et al. Effect of physical, chemical and electro-kinetic properties of pumice on strength development of pumice blended cements. Mater Struct 46, 1695–1706 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-0008-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-0008-y

Keywords

Navigation