Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is an emerging construction material that uses a by-product material such as fly ash as a complete substitute for cement. This paper evaluates the bond strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete with reinforcing steel. Pull-out test in accordance with the ASTM A944 Standard was carried out on 24 geopolymer concrete and 24 ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete beam-end specimens, and the bond strengths of the two types of concrete were compared. The compressive strength of geopolymer concrete varied from 25 to 39 MPa. The other test parameters were concrete cover and bar diameter. The reinforcing steel was 20 mm and 24 mm diameter 500 MPa steel deformed bars. The concrete cover to bar diameter ratio varied from 1.71 to 3.62. Failure occurred with the splitting of concrete in the region bonded with the steel bar, in both geopolymer and OPC concrete specimens. Comparison of the test results shows that geopolymer concrete has higher bond strength than OPC concrete. This is because of the higher splitting tensile strength of geopolymer concrete than of OPC concrete of the same compressive strength. A comparison between the splitting tensile strengths of OPC and geopolymer concrete of compressive strengths ranging from 25 to 89 MPa shows that geopolymer concrete has higher splitting tensile strength than OPC concrete. This suggests that the existing analytical expressions for bond strength of OPC concrete can be conservatively used for calculation of bond strength of geopolymer concrete with reinforcing steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakai K (2008) Environmental management of concrete and concrete structures—toward sustainable development in construction industry. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on analytical models and new concepts in concrete and masonry structures, 9–11 June. Lodz, Poland, pp 139–155

  2. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ et al (2004) On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J 101(6):467–472

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ et al (2005) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Aust J Struct Eng 6(1):77–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rangan BV (2006) Studies on low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Indian concrete institute journal, October–December. ICI, India, pp 9–17

  5. Sumajouw DMJ, Hardjito D, Wallah SE et al (2007) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: study of slender columns. J Mater Sci 42(9):3124–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarker PK (2009) Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns. Mater Struct 42:715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez-Jimenez AM, Palomo A, Lopez-Hombrados C (2006) Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater J 103(2):106–112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA et al (2007) Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cement Concr Res 37:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Orangun CO, Jirsa JO and Breen JE (1977) A re-evaluation of test data on development length and splices. ACI J 74:114–122

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esfahani MR, Rangan BV (1998) Bond between normal strength and high strength concrete (HSC) and reinforcing bars in splices in beams. ACI Struct J 95(3):272–280

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zuo J, Darwin D (2000) Splice strength of conventional and high relative rib area bars in normal and high strength concrete. ACI Struct J 97(4):630–641

    Google Scholar 

  12. ACI Committee 408 (2003) Bond development of straight reinforcing bars in tension (ACI 408R-03). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, US, p 49

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahlborn TM, DenHartigh TC (2003) A comparative bond study of stainless and high-chromium reinforcing bars in concrete. J Transp Res Board 88–95

  14. Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA et al (2007) Bond performance of reinforcing bars in inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). J Mater Sci 42:3107–3116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM A 944-99 (1999) Standard test method for comparing bond strength of steel reinforcing bars to concrete beam-end specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard, West Conshohocken, US

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM C 618 (2005) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard, West Conshohocken, US

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC1. Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia. http://espace.lis.curtin.edu.au/

  18. Chang EH (2009) Shear and bond behaviour of reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer concrete beams, PhD thesis. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, 382 pp

  19. Zain MFM, Mahmud HB, Ilham A et al (2002) Prediction of splitting tensile strength of high performance concrete. Cement Concr Res 32:1251–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ (1005) The interface between natural selicious aggregates and geopolymers. Cement Concr Res 34:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang YS, Sun W, Li JZ (2005) Hydration process of interfacial transition in potassium polysialate (K-PSDS) geopolymer concrete. Mag Concr Res 57(1):33–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Rocky Vasile, Aidan Grigg and the laboratory technicians of the Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, in carrying out the experimental work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabir Kumar Sarker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarker, P.K. Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Mater Struct 44, 1021–1030 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9683-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9683-8

Keywords

Navigation