Skip to main content
Log in

FRP tube encased rubberized concrete cylinders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, FRP tube encased waste tire rubber modified concrete cylinders were investigated. Four batches of confined and unconfined concrete cylinders with a diameter of 101.6 mm and a height of 304.8 mm were prepared. Each batch contained three confined cylinders and three unconfined cylinders. The total number of effective cylinders prepared was 24. Batches 1–3 were made of rubberized concrete. In Batch 1, 15% by volume of coarse aggregate was replaced by waste tire fibers or stripes; in Batches 2 and 3, 15% by volume of sand and 30% by volume of sand were replaced by crumb rubbers, respectively. Batch 4 was a control batch with conventional plain concrete. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted on all the cylinders per ASTM C39. Strain gages were installed on the encased rubberized concrete cylinders to obtain local strain distributions. The compressive strength and strain at the peak load were compared with the predictions by available design-oriented confinement models. It is found that the FRP tube encased rubberized concrete cylinders have higher confinement effectiveness, ductility, and elastic regions than FRP tube encased conventional concrete cylinders. Waste tire fiber modified concrete performs better than crumb rubber modified concrete with a lower cost. Instead of volume contraction, FRP encased rubberized concrete cylinders experience volumetric expansion. The current design-oriented confinement models cannot consistently predict the compressive strength and strain of the encased cylinders. An 1-D coupon test cannot uniquely determine the hoop tensile strength of the FRP tubes which are subjected to a 2-D stress condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Douglah S, Everett JW (1998) Scrap tire disposal: I. Survey of state programs. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 25:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eldin NN, Senouci AB (1993) Rubber-tire practices as concrete aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 5:478–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khatib ZK, Bayomy FM (1999) Rubberized Portland cement concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 11:206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goulias DG, Ali AH (1998) Evaluation of rubber-filled concrete and correlation between destructive and nondestructive testing results. Cem Concr Aggreg 20:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee HS, Lee H, Moon JS, Jung HW (1998) Development of tire-added latex concrete. ACI Mater J 95:356–364

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li G, Stubbelfield MA, Garrick G, Eggers J, Abadie C, Huang B (2004) Development of waste tire modified concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:2283–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang B, Li G, Pang SS, Eggers J (2004) Investigation into waste tire rubber filled concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 16:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li G, Garrick G, Eggers J, Abadie C, Stubblefield MA, Pang SS (2004) Waste tire fiber modified concrete. Compos B 35:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fardis MN, Khalili HH (1982) FRP-encased concrete as a structural material. Mag Concr Res 34:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirmiran A, Shahawy M (1996) A new concrete-filled hollow FRP composite column. Compos B 27B:263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li G, Torres S, Alaywan W, Abadie C (2005) Experimental study of FRP tube-encased concrete columns. J Compos Mater 39:1131–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li G (2006) Experimental study of FRP confined concrete cylinders. Eng Struct 28:1001–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li G, Maricherla D (2007) Advanced grid stiffened FRP tube encased concrete cylinders. J Compos Mater 41:1803–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li G (2007) Experimental study of hybrid composite cylinders. Compos Struct 78:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samaan M, Mirmiran A, Shahawy M (1998) Modeling of concrete confined by fiber composites. J Struct Eng 124:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam L, Teng JG (2003) Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construct Build Mater 17:471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114:1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richart FE, Brandtzaeg A, Brown RL (1928) A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses, Engineering Experimental Station Bull. No. 185. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newman K, Newman JB (1971) Failure theories and design criteria for plain concrete. In: Proceedings of international civil engineering material conference on structure, solid mechanics and engineering design. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 936–995

  20. Cusson D, Paultre P (1995) Stress–strain model for confined high strength concrete. J Struct Eng 121:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karbhari VM, Gao Y (1997) Composite jacketed concrete under uniaxial compression—verification of simple design equations. J Mater Civ Eng 9:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toutanji HA (1999) Stress–strain characteristics of concrete columns externally confined with advanced fiber composite sheets. ACI Mater J 96:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miyauchi K, Inoue S, Kuroda T, Kobayashi A (1999) Strengthening effects of concrete columns with carbon fiber sheet. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 21:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saafi M (2000) Design and fabrication of FRP grids for aerospace and civil engineering applications. J Aerosp Eng 13:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng H-L, Sotelino ED, Chen W-F (2002) Strength estimation for FRP wrapped reinforced concrete columns. Steel Compos Struct 2:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lam L, Teng JG (2002) Strength models for fiber-reinforced plastic-confined concrete. J Struct Eng 128:612–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin HJ, Liao CI (2004) Compressive strength of reinforced concrete-column confined by composite materials. Compos Struct 65:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Inc., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saadatmanesh H, Ehasni MR, Li MW (1994) Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite straps. ACI Struct J 91:434–447

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lam L, Teng JG (2001) A new stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. In Teng JG (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on FRP composite in civil engineering. Elsevier, Inc., Amsterdam

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially sponsored by an NSF/Louisiana Board of Regents Joint Faculty Appointment Program (NSF/LEQSF(2000-01)-NCA-JFAP-10), NSF under grant number HRD 0734845, and a Louisiana Board of Regents/ITRS project (LEQSF(2004-07)-RD-B-05). The specimens were prepared and the tests were conducted in the Concrete Laboratory at the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC). The FRP tubes were provided by EDO Specialty Plastics. The assistance by Mr. Randy Young from LTRC and Mr. Manu John at Louisiana State University is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoqiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G., Pang, SS. & Ibekwe, S.I. FRP tube encased rubberized concrete cylinders. Mater Struct 44, 233–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9622-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9622-8

Keywords

Navigation