Abstract
Behavior of normal strength concrete columns reinforced with a new reinforcement, termed Prefabricated Cage System (PCS) is investigated. A total of 16 small-scale PCS and rebar reinforced column specimens were constructed and tested under monotonic axial displacement. The experimental results indicate that the overall behavior of rebar and PCS reinforced specimens are comparable prior to achieving the peak column load. In general, PCS specimens are more ductile and absorb more energy than similar rebar specimens after the peak load is reached. The effect of different parameters, such as the steel tube thickness, number of longitudinal reinforcements, transverse steel spacing, and crossties on the specimens’ strength and deformation capacity are investigated. A confined concrete model is proposed and used to predict the load–displacement response. The theoretical load–displacement relations obtained from the proposed model are compared with those obtained from the Mander et al. (J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826, 1988) confinement model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACI 318 (2005) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills
Bing L, Park R, Tanaka H (2001) Stress–strain behavior of high-strength concrete confined by ultra-high- and normal-strength transverse reinforcements. ACI Struct J 98(3):395–406
Fisher M (2009) Experimental evaluation of reinforcement methods for concrete beam-column joints. M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826
Miller AE (2006) Experimental research of reinforced concrete column retrofit methods. M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Sezen H, Shamsai M (2006) Behavior of normal strength concrete columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. In: Paper presented at structures congress, St. Louis, Missouri, 18–21 May 2006
Sezen H, Shamsai M (2008) High-strength concrete columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. ASCE J Struct Eng 134(5):750–757
Shamsai M (2006) Prefabricated cage system for reinforcing concrete members. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Shamsai M, Sezen H (2005) Fast and easy concrete construction using innovative steel reinforcement. In: Paper presented at construction research congress, San Diego, 4–7 April 2005, pp 317–321
Shamsai M, Whitlatch E, Sezen H (2007) Economic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. ASCE J Constr Eng Manag 133(11):864–870
Sheikh SA, Uzumeri SM (1980) Mechanism of confinement in tied columns. In: Proceedings of the 7th world conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, Sep 1980, pp 71–78
Soliman MTM, Yu CW (1967) The flexural stress–strain relationship of concrete confined by rectangular transverse reinforcement. Mag Concr Res Lond 19(61):223–238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shamsai, M., Sezen, H. Behavior of square concrete columns reinforced with Prefabricated Cage System. Mater Struct 44, 89–100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9611-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9611-y