Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior of square concrete columns reinforced with Prefabricated Cage System

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior of normal strength concrete columns reinforced with a new reinforcement, termed Prefabricated Cage System (PCS) is investigated. A total of 16 small-scale PCS and rebar reinforced column specimens were constructed and tested under monotonic axial displacement. The experimental results indicate that the overall behavior of rebar and PCS reinforced specimens are comparable prior to achieving the peak column load. In general, PCS specimens are more ductile and absorb more energy than similar rebar specimens after the peak load is reached. The effect of different parameters, such as the steel tube thickness, number of longitudinal reinforcements, transverse steel spacing, and crossties on the specimens’ strength and deformation capacity are investigated. A confined concrete model is proposed and used to predict the load–displacement response. The theoretical load–displacement relations obtained from the proposed model are compared with those obtained from the Mander et al. (J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826, 1988) confinement model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACI 318 (2005) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  2. Bing L, Park R, Tanaka H (2001) Stress–strain behavior of high-strength concrete confined by ultra-high- and normal-strength transverse reinforcements. ACI Struct J 98(3):395–406

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher M (2009) Experimental evaluation of reinforcement methods for concrete beam-column joints. M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus

  4. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller AE (2006) Experimental research of reinforced concrete column retrofit methods. M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus

  6. Sezen H, Shamsai M (2006) Behavior of normal strength concrete columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. In: Paper presented at structures congress, St. Louis, Missouri, 18–21 May 2006

  7. Sezen H, Shamsai M (2008) High-strength concrete columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. ASCE J Struct Eng 134(5):750–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shamsai M (2006) Prefabricated cage system for reinforcing concrete members. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus

  9. Shamsai M, Sezen H (2005) Fast and easy concrete construction using innovative steel reinforcement. In: Paper presented at construction research congress, San Diego, 4–7 April 2005, pp 317–321

  10. Shamsai M, Whitlatch E, Sezen H (2007) Economic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. ASCE J Constr Eng Manag 133(11):864–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheikh SA, Uzumeri SM (1980) Mechanism of confinement in tied columns. In: Proceedings of the 7th world conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, Sep 1980, pp 71–78

  12. Soliman MTM, Yu CW (1967) The flexural stress–strain relationship of concrete confined by rectangular transverse reinforcement. Mag Concr Res Lond 19(61):223–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Shamsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamsai, M., Sezen, H. Behavior of square concrete columns reinforced with Prefabricated Cage System. Mater Struct 44, 89–100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9611-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9611-y

Keywords

Navigation