Skip to main content
Log in

Desalination of a brick by application of an electric DC field

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salts in masonry can cause various problems as decay of the masonry itself, lost adhesion of plaster and hygroscopic moisture. Chlorides are among the most common building salts and the present paper is focused on removal of chlorides from a brick in an applied electric field as a step towards developing an electrochemical desalination method for brick masonry. Experiments were conducted in laboratory scale with one type of bricks that were contaminated with either NaCl or KCl through submersion in salt solutions prior to application of current. It was seen that NaCl was slower supplied to the brick during submersion and slower removed in the applied electric field than KCl. This indicates that the removal rate of chloride depends on the associated cation and this must be taken into account when desiding the duration of full scale actions. The electrochemical desalination was very efficient and 99% removal of chloride was obtained. The final concentration in the brick after treatment was less than 10 mg Cl/kg and this concentration is unproblematic. When low salt concentrations were reached during the electrochemical treatment, electroosmotic dewatering of the brick started, showing that electroosmotic dewatering occurs at low ionic concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomez-Heras M, Fort R (2007) Patterns of halite (NaCl) crystallisation in building stone conditioned by laboratory heating regimes. Environ Geol 52:259–267. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0538-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Linnow K, Juling H, Steiger M (2007) Investigation of NaCl deliquescence in porous substrate using RH-XRD. Environ Geol 52:317–327. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0590-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruedrich J, Siegesmund S (2007) Salt and ice crystallization in porous sandstones. Environ Geol 52:225–249. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0585-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perry SH, Duffy AP (1997) The short-term effects of mortar joints on salt movement in stone. Atmos Environ 31(9):1297–1305. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00290-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ottosen LM, Rörig-Dalgård I (2007) Electrokinetic removal of Ca(NO3)2 from bricks to avoid salt induced decay. Electrochim Acta 52(10):3454–3463. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ottosen LM, Pedersen AJ, Rörig-Dalgård I (2007) Salt- related problems in brick masonry and electrokinetic removal of the salts. J Build Appraisal 3(3):181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fajardo G, Escadeillas G, Arliguie G (2006) Electrochemical chloride extraction (ECE) from steel-reinforced concrete specimens contaminated by “artificial” sea-water. Corros Sci 48:110–125. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2004.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ihekwaba NM, Hope BB, Hansson CM (1996) Pull-out and bond degradation of steel rebars in ECE concrete. Cement Concr Res 26(2):267–282

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hosseini A, Khaloo AR (2005) Study of electrochemical chloride extraction as a non-destructive repair method: Part I. Discrete test samples. Asain J Civ Eng 6(3):167–182 Building and Housing

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahl J, Lü X (2007) Studying of salt diffusion behaviour in brick. J Mater Sci 42:2512–2520. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-1005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beddoe RE, Dorner HW (2005) Modelling acid attack on concrete: Part I. The essential mechanisms. Cement Concr Res 35:2333–2339. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castellote M, Andrade C, Alonso C (2000) Electrochemical removal of chlorides. Modelling of the extraction, resulting profiles and determination of the efficient time of treatment. Cement Concr Res 30:615–621. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00220-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeung AT, Datla S (1995) Fundamental formulation of electrokinetic extraction of contaminants from soil. Can Geotech J 32:569–583. doi:10.1139/t95-060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ottosen LM, Hansen HK, Ribeiro AB, Villumsen A (2001) Removal of Cu, Pb and Zn in an applied electric field in calcareous and non-calcareous soils. J Hazard Mater 85(3):291–299. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00231-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grundl T, Michalski P (1996) Electroosmotically driven water flow in sediments. Water Res 30(4):811–818. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(95)00224-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahl J (2004) Salt diffusion in brick structures Part II The effect of temperature, concentration and salt. J Mater Sci 39(13):4247–4254. doi:10.1023/B:JMSC.0000033406.40090.b4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. West LJ, Stewart DI, Binley AM, Shaw B (1999) Resisistivity imaging of soil during electrokinetic transport. Eng Geol 53:205–215. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00034-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baraud F, Tellier S, Astruc M (1997) Ion velocity in soil solution during electrokinetic remediation. J Hazard Mater 56:315–332. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00073-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation is greatly acknowledged for financial support. Ebba Schnell and Johanne M. Nielsen carefully conducted the laboratory work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisbeth M. Ottosen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ottosen, L.M., Rörig-Dalgaard, I. Desalination of a brick by application of an electric DC field. Mater Struct 42, 961–971 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9435-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9435-1

Keywords

Navigation