Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of accelerometers to determine pavement deflections under traffic loads

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to study the use of accelerometers to measure pavement deflections due to traffic loads. To this end, accelerometers were embedded in two sites: the full scale load simulator Circular Test Track (CTT) and the A1 motorway in Switzerland. Deflections were derived from acceleration measurements using an algorithm that double integrates the measured signal and corrects any errors derived from the procedure. In the motorway, deflections were monitored using a set of three magnetostrictive deflectometers. Additionally, the pavement’s material viscoelastic parameters determined in the laboratory were incorporated in Finite Element (FE) models to estimate the theoretical deflections. The calculated deflections were then compared to the measured and to the theoretical deflections. Deflections calculated from acceleration showed a reasonable qualitative correlation to those measured by magnetostrictive deflectometers. In addition, the FE models revealed the inability of the accelerometers to measure very slow or quasi-static motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Beer M, Horak E, Visser AT (1989) The multidepth deflectometer (MDD) system for determining the effective elastic modules of pavement layers. In: Bush AJ III, Baladi GY (eds) Nondestructive testing of pavements and back calculation of modules, ASTM STP 1026. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 70–89

  2. Tabatabaee N, Al-Quadi IL, Sebaaly PE (1992) Field evaluation of pavement instrumentation methods. J Test Eval 20(2):144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raab C, Partl MN, Anderegg P, Brönnimann R (2003) Two years experience with a new long-term pavement performance monitoring station on a Swiss motorway. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control, 7–10 July, Minho University, Guimarães, Portugal, pp 263–271

  4. Hoffman MS, Thompson MR (1982) Comparative study of selected nondestructive testing devices. Transp Res Rec 852:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tandon V, Nazarian S (1992) Comprehensive evaluation of five sensors used to measure pavement deflection. Transp Res Rec 1355:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sokolov K, Gubler R, Partl MN (2005) Extended numerical modeling and application of the coaxial shear test for asphalt pavements. J Mater Struct 279:515–522

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arraigada M, Partl MN, Angelone SM (2007) Determination of road deflections from traffic induced accelerations. Road Mater Pavement Des 8(3):399–421. doi:10.3166/rmpd.8.399-421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boore DM (1999) Effect of baseline corrections on response spectra for two recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 99–945. U.S. Geological Survey, 1999

  9. Blab R, Harvey JT (2002) Modeling measured 3D tire contact stresses in a viscoelastic FE pavement model. Int J Geomech 2(3):271–290. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:3(271)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collop AC, McDowell GR, Lee YW (2006) Modelling dilation in an idealised asphalt mixture using discrete element modelling. Granul Matter 8:175–184. doi:10.1007/s10035-006-0013-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ABAQUS Version 6.5 Documentation (2004) ABAQUS Inc.

  12. Caprez M, Rabaiotti C (2006) Review and future perspective of road research in Switzerland based on “Rundlauf’’ Circular Test Track results. In: Baoshan H, Roger M, Jorge P, Erol T (eds) Proceedings of sessions of GeoShanghai 2006, ASCE, pp 134–141

  13. Swiss Standard SN 640 430b (2008) Walzasphalt. Ausführung und Anforderungen an die eingebauten Schichten. (Hot rolled asphalt. Construction and requirements of the pavement layers) Schweizerischer Verband der Strassen- und Verkehrsfachleute VSS

  14. Swiss Standard SN 640 431-1b-NA (2008) Asphaltmischgut Mischgutanforderungen—Teil 1: Asphaltbeton. (Asphalt mix requirements—part 1: asphalt concrete) Schweizerischer Verband der Strassen- und Verkehrsfachleute VSS

  15. Poulikakos L, Heutschi K, Anderegg P, Calderara R, Doupal E, Siegrist R et al (2005) Determination of the environmental footprint of Freight vehicles. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on weigh-in-motion ICWIM4, 20–22 Feb, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 189–197

  16. Doupal E, Gysi M (2002) Measurement of dynamic wheel load distributions. In: Proceedings of NATMEC 2002—ICWIM-3 Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, May 13–15

  17. Pellinen TK, Witczak MW (2002) Stress dependent master curve construction for dynamic (complex) modulus. Annual meeting association of asphalt paving technologists, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Arraigada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arraigada, M., Partl, M.N., Angelone, S.M. et al. Evaluation of accelerometers to determine pavement deflections under traffic loads. Mater Struct 42, 779–790 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9423-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9423-5

Keywords

Navigation