Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior of mass concrete under biaxial compression-tension and triaxial compression-compression-tension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To meet the requirement of nonlinear analysis and design for mass concrete structures, the mechanical characteristics of mass concrete specimens 25 × 25 × 40 cm with three-graded aggregate 5–80 mm under biaxial compression-tension and triaxial compression-compression-tension was studied experimentally with the multiaxial concrete apparatus. In comparison with the corresponding wet-screened concrete specimens 15 × 15 × 30 cm with two-graded aggregate 5–40 mm, it was found that the wet-screened effect and size effect under complex stress states were obvious, as under uniaxial stress state. By regression of the tests results, respective failure criteria for mass concrete in principal stress space and octahedronal stress space were proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tumidajski PJ, Gong B (2006) Effect of coarse aggregate size on strength and workability of concrete. Can J Civ Eng 33(2):206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo ZH (1997) Strength and deformation of concrete: test foundation and constitutive relationship. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Song YP (2002) Failure criteria and constitutive relations of concrete. Water Power Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kupfer H, Hilsdorf HK, Rusch H (1969) Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. ACI J Proc 66(8):656–666

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang LH, Huang DH, Xie NX (1991) Behavior of under compress-compressive-tensile stresses. ACI Mater J 88(2):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song YP, Zhao GF (1996) Failure criterion of the mass concrete under combined compression-tension stress states. In: Proceedings of 6th International Offshore and Polar Engineering conference, ISOPE, Golden, CO, USA, 26–31 May 1996

  7. Li Q, Duan Y, Wang G (2002) Behavior of large concrete specimens in uniaxial tension. Mag Concr Res 54(3):385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swaddiwudhipong S, Lu HR, Wee TH (2003) Direct tension test and tensile strain capacity of concrete at early age. Cem Concr Res 33(12):2077–2084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. GB175-99, National Standard of the People’s Republic of China (1999) Portland cement and ordinary Portland cement (in Chinese)

  10. Rosenthal I, Glucklich J (1970) Strength of plain concrete under biaxial stresses. ACI J Proc 67(11):903–914

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tasuji I, Slate F, Nilson A (1978) Stress–strain response and fracture of concrete in biaxial loading. ACI J Proc 75(7):306–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under a grant from the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50479059). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. L. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H.L., Song, Y.P. Behavior of mass concrete under biaxial compression-tension and triaxial compression-compression-tension. Mater Struct 42, 241–249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9381-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9381-y

Keywords

Navigation