Materials and Structures

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1143–1167 | Cite as

Behaviour of concrete beams under torsion: NSC plain and hollow beams

Original Article

Abstract

A simple computation procedure is developed to predict the general behaviour of reinforced concrete beams under torsion. Both plain and hollow normal strength concrete beams are considered. Different theoretical models are used to reflect the actual behaviour of the beams in the various phases of loading. To pass from a phase to the following one, transition criteria need to be taken into consideration. Such criteria are explained. The theoretical predictions are compared with result from reported tests. Conclusions are presented. The main conclusion is that the calculation procedure described in this paper gives good predictions when compared with the actual behaviour of the plain and hollow beams.

Keywords

Reinforced concrete Beams Torsion Theoretical behaviour 

References

  1. 1.
    ACI Committee 318 (1995) Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, (ACI 318-95), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ACI Committee 318 (2005) Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, (ACI 318-05), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen P (1935) Experiments with concrete in torsion. Trans ASCE 100:949–983Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernardo LFA (2003) Torção em Vigas em Caixão de Betão de Alta Resistência (Torsion in reinforced high-strength concrete hollow beams). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Coimbra, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CEB (1969) Torsion. Bulletin d’Information No. 71, MarsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CEB-FIP (1978) Model code for concrete structures. CEB-FIP International Recommendations, 3rd edn. Paris, 348 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    CEB-FIP MODEL CODE (1990) Comité Euro-International du Béton, SuisseGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CEN prEN 1992-1-1 (2002) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—Part 1: general rules and rules for buildings, April 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins MP (1973) Torque-twist characteristics of reinforced concrete beams. Inelasticity and non-linearity in Structural Concrete Study No. 8. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp 211–232Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins MP, Mitchell D (1980) Shear and torsion design of prestressed and non-prestressed concrete beams. J Prestressed Concrete Inst Proc 25(5):32–100Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowan HJ (1950) Elastic Theory for torsional strength of rectangular reinforced concrete beams. Mag Concrete Res Lond 2(4): 3–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elfgren L (1972) Reinforced concrete beams loaded in combined torsion, bending and shear publication 71:3 division of concrete structures. Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg Sweden, 249 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu TTC (1968) Torsion of structural concrete—Behavior of reinforced concrete rectangular members torsion of structural concrete SP-18. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp 261–306Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsu TTC (1973) Post-cracking torsional stiffness of reinforced concrete sections. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 70(5):352–360Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu TTC (1979) Discussion of pure torsion in rectangular sections—A re-examination. In: McMullen AE, Rangan BV, J Am Concrete Inst Proc 76(6):741–746Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsu TTC (1984) Torsion of reinforced concrete. Van Nostrand Reinhold CompanyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hsu TTC, Mo YL (1985) Softening of concrete in torsional members—Theory and tests. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 82(3):290–303Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu TTC, Mo YL (1985) Softening of concrete in torsional members—Design recommendations. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 82(4):443–452Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lampert P, Thurlimann B (1969) Torsionsversuche an Stahlbetonbalken (Torsion tests of reinforced concrete beams) Bericht Nr 6506-2. Institut fur Baustatik, ETH Zurich, 101 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leonhardt F, Schelling G (1974) Torsionsversuche an Stahl Betonbalken Bulletin No. 239. Deutscher Ausschuss fur Stahlbeton, Berlin, 122 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacGregor JG, Ghoneim MG (1995) Design for Torsion. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 92(2):211–218Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McMullen AE, Rangan BV (1978) Pure torsion in rectangular sections—A re-examination. J Am Concrete Inst 75(10):511–519Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell D, Collins MP (1974) The behavior of structural concrete beams in pure torsion. Civil Engineering Publication No. 74-06, Department of civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell D, Collins MP (1974) Diagonal compression field theory—A rational model for structural concrete in pure torsion. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 71(8):396–408Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rahal KN, Collins MP (1995) Effect of thickness of concrete cover on shear-torsion interaction—An experimental investigation. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 92(3):334–342Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahal KN, Collins MP (1995) Analysis of sections subjected to combined shear and torsion—A theoretical model. ACI Struct J 92(4):459–469Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahal KN, Collins MP (1996) Simple model for predicting torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete sections. J Am Concrete Inst Proc 93(6):658–666Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahal KN, Collins MP (2003) Combined torsion and bending in reiinforced and prestressed concrete beams. ACI Struct J 100(2):157–165Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rausch E (1929) Berechnung des Eisenbetons gegen Verdrehung (Design of reinforced concrete in torsion). Ph.D. Thesis, Berlin, 53 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Standards Council of Canada (2004) Design of concrete structure for buildings. CAN3-A23.3-04, Canadian Standards Association, Mississanga, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vecchio FJ, Collins MP (1981) Stress-strain characteristics of reinforced concrete in pure shear. IABSE Colloquium, Advanced Mechanics of Reinforced concrete, Delft, Final Report, pp 211–225Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vecchio FJ, Collins MP (1982) The response of reinforced concrete to in-plane shear and normal forces. Publication No. 82-03. Department of Civil Engineering, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vecchio FJ, Collins MP (1986) The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected do shear. J Am Concrete Inst 83:219–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Engenharia CivilUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhaPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia CivilUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations