Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 52:117 | Cite as

An evaluation of yield and Maxwell fluid behaviors of fly ash suspensions in alkali-silicate solutions

  • Anvit Gadkar
  • Kolluru V. L. SubramaniamEmail author
Original Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

The rheological behavior of fly ash suspensions in alkali-silicate solutions used to prepare geopolymers is investigated. The transient stress response of fly ash suspensions at a constant applied strain rate is influenced by both the solids loading and the rheological behavior of the activating solution. The alkali-silicate solution itself behaves like a Newtonian fluid. The fundamental response of alkali-silicate fly ash suspension under constant applied shear strain rate exhibits a transition from a yield type to Maxwell flow. The variability in the Maxwell flow to yield type behavior depends upon the solids loading given by the solution to binder ratio and the composition of the activating solution. In both Maxwell flow and yield type responses, the maximum stress before initiation of flow is directly influenced by the viscosity of the activating solution. At specific solid loading, the transition between the Maxwell flow to yield type behavior is controlled by the composition of the activating solution. The viscous nature of the alkali-silicate solution produces a rate dependent transient response under constant applied strain rate.

Keywords

Rheology Alkali activated fly ash Yield stress Maxwell flow Transition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Department of Science and Technology, Initiative to Promote Energy Efficient Habitant (I-PHEE) Grant No. TMD/CERI/BEE/2016/031.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Assaad J, Khayat KH (2004) Assessment of thixotropy of self-consolidating concrete and concrete-equivalent-mortar—effect of binder composition and content. ACI Mater J 101(5):400–408Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi M, Park K, Oh T (2016) Viscoelastic properties of fresh cement paste to study the flow behavior. Int J Concr Struct Mater 10(3):65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0158-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deng SC, Zhang XB, Qin YH, Luo GX (2007) Rheological characteristic of cement clean paste and flowing behavior of fresh mixing concrete with pumping in pipeline. J Cent South Univ Technol (Engl Ed).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-007-0307-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Güllü H, Canakci H, Al Zangana IF (2017) Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing. Constr Build Mater 137:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JH, Kwon SH, Kawashima S, Yim HJ (2017) Rheology of cement paste under high pressure. Cem Concr Compos 77:60–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panda B, Singh GB, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2019) Synthesis and characterization of one-part geopolymers for extrusion based 3D concrete printing. J Clean Prod 220:610–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panda B, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2018) Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing. Cem Concr Compos 94:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panda B, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2019) Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing. Compos B Eng 176:107290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perrot A, Mélinge Y, Rangeard D, Micaelli F, Estellé P, Lanos C (2012) Use of ram extruder as a combined rheo-tribometer to study the behavior of high yield stress fluids at low strain rate. Rheol Acta 51(8):743–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-012-0638-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petit JY, Wirquin E, Vanhove Y, Khayat K (2007) Yield stress and viscosity equations for mortars and self-consolidating concrete. Cem Concr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Zijl GPAG, Paul SC, Tanv MJ (2016) Properties of 3D Printable Concrete. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2016). pp 421–426Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canakci H, Güllü H, Alhashemy A (2019) Performances of using geopolymers made with various stabilizers for deep mixing. Materials 12(16):2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Güllü H, Cevik A, Al-Ezzi KM, Gülsan ME (2019) On the rheology of using geopolymer for grouting: a comparative study with cement-based grout included fly ash and cold bonded fly ash. Constr Build Mater 196:594–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, Nguyen T, Kashani A, van Deventer JSJ (2017) Pore characteristics in one-part mix geopolymers foamed by H2O2: the impact of mix design. Mater Des 130(May):381–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, Sanjayan J (2017) Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams. Mater Des.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laskar AI, Bhattacharjee R (2011) Rheology of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J 108(5):536–542Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muthu Kumar E, Ramamurthy K (2017) Influence of production on the strength, density and water absorption of aerated geopolymer paste and mortar using Class F fly ash. Constr Build Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narayanan N, Ramamurthy K (2000) Structure and properties of aerated concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 22(5):321–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00016-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhagath Singh GVP, Subramaniam KVL (2017) Evaluation of sodium content and sodium hydroxide molarity on compressive strength of alkali activated low-calcium fly ash. Cem Concr Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhagath Singh GVP, Subrahmanyam C, Subramaniam KVL (2017) Dissolution of the glassy phase in low-calcium fly ash during alkaline activation. Adv Cem Res.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.17.00170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhagath Singh GVP, Subramaniam KVL (2019) Influence of processing temperature on the reaction product and strength gain in alkali-activated fly ash. Cem Concr Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, Van Deventer JSJ (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu H, Van Deventer JSJ (2000) The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. Int J Miner Process.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vance K, Dakhane A, Sant G, Neithalath N (2014) Observations on the rheological response of alkali activated fly ash suspensions: the role of activator type and concentration. Rheol Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0793-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kondepudi K, Subramaniam KVL (2019) Rheological characterization of low-calcium fly ash suspensions in alkaline silicate colloidal solutions for geopolymer concrete production. J Clean Prod.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burgos-Montes O, Palacios M, Rivilla P, Puertas F (2012) Compatibility between superplasticizer admixtures and cements with mineral additions. Constr Build Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Criado M, Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A, Banfill PFG (2009) Alkali activated fly ash: effect of admixtures on paste rheology. Rheol Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-008-0345-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hicks JK, Montes C, Allouche EN (2013) Rheological behavior of fly-ash-based geopolymers. Geopolym Binder Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1520/stp156620120094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Palacios M, Puertas F, Bowen P, Houst YF (2009) Effect of PCs superplasticizers on the rheological properties and hydration process of slag-blended cement pastes. J Mater Sci 44(10):2714–2723.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3356-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Termkhajornkit P, Nawa T (2004) The fluidity of fly ash-cement paste containing naphthalene sulfonate superplasticizer. Cem Concr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panda B, Tan MJ (2018) Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing. Ceram Int 44(9):10258–10265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jeong H, Han SJ, Choi SH, Lee YJ, Yi ST, Kim KS (2019) Rheological property criteria for buildable 3D printing concrete. Materials.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kogan M, Ducloué L, Goyon J, Chateau X, Pitois O, Ovarlez G (2013) Mixtures of foam and paste: suspensions of bubbles in yield stress fluids. Rheol Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0677-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    ASTM (2015) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural Pozzolan for use in concrete ASTM C618-15, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) (2003) Pulverized fuel ash specification. IS 3812-part 1, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olivas A, Helsel MA, Martys NS, Ferraris CF, George WL, Ferron R (2016) Rheological measurement of suspensions without slippage: experimental and model.  https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1946
  37. 37.
    Saak AW, Jennings HM, Shah SP (2001) The influence of wall slip on yield stress and viscoelastic measurements of cement paste. Cem Concr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00440-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frigaard IA, Paso KG, de Souza Mendes PR (2017) Bingham’s model in the oil and gas industry. Rheol Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-017-0999-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roussel N, Ovarlez G, Garrault S, Brumaud C (2012) The origins of thixotropy of fresh cement pastes. Cem Concr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Saak AW, Jennings HM, Shah SP (2004) A generalized approach for the determination of yield stress by slump and slump flow. Cem Concr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mezger T (2006) The rheology handbook: for users of rotational and oscillatory rheometers. Vincent Verlag, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang X, Zhu W, Yang Q (2008) The viscosity properties of sodium silicate solutions. J Solut Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-007-9214-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang X, Subramaniam KV (2011) Ultrasonic monitoring of capillary porosity and elastic properties in hydrating cement paste. Cem Concr Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Barnes HA (1997) Thixotropy—a review. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-0257(97)00004-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations