Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 52:109 | Cite as

FRP fibre-cementitious matrix interfacial bond under time-dependent loading

  • Mohammed FarooqEmail author
  • Nemkumar Banthia
Original Article
  • 263 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the behavior of the interfacial bond between an innovative FRP fibre and cement mortar under time-dependent loading. Two types of FRP fibres—GFRP and CFRP were investigated. Particularly, the fibre pullout response under quasi-static loading is compared with the response under dynamic loading. To gauge the long term behavior of cracked fibre reinforced composites, fibre relaxation tests were conducted in which initial strain was imparted and sustained, and the relaxation of the composite in terms of drop in load over time period was monitored at room temperature as well as at 50 °C. FRP fibres were found to be to some extent sensitive to loading rate, with an increase in the range of 30–50% in the peak load under dynamic loading. The GFRP fibres itself depicted higher strengths under dynamic loading rate. Under a sustained fibre slip, FRP fibres showed a lower relaxation at both room temperature and at 50 °C compared to commercially available steel and polypropylene fibres. There was also no conclusive change in pullout response in specimen subjected to sustained strains compared to reference.

Keywords

Fibre reinforced concrete Fibre reinforced polymers Dynamic Relaxation Impact Creep 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support received from the Composites Research Network of the Materials Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. The authors are also grateful for the financial support received from the Tricon Concrete Finishing Company and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). As well, we wish to show our gratitude for the support given us by the Canada-India Research Centre of Excellence (IC-IMPACTS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Farooq M, Banthia N (2018) An innovative FRP fibre for concrete reinforcement: production of fibre, micromechanics, and durability. Constr Build Mater 177C:406–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banthia N, Trottier JF (1991) Deformed steel fiber-cementitious matrix bond under impact. Cem Concr Res 21:158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(91)90042-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banthia N, Trottier J (1991) Strain rate sensitivity of fibre matrix bond. Ceram Trans 16:603–618Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gokoz UN, Naaman AE (1981) Effect of strain-rate on the pull-out behaviour of fibres in mortar. Int J Cem Compos Light Concr 3:187–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(81)90051-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banthia N (1990) A study of some factors affecting the fiber–matrix bond in steel fiber reinforced concrete. Can J Civ Eng 17:610–620.  https://doi.org/10.1139/l90-069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abu-Lebdeh T, Hamoush S, Zornig B (2010) Rate effect on pullout behavior of steel fibers embedded in very-high strength concrete. Am J Eng Appl Sci 3:454–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim DJ, El-Tawil S, Naaman AE (2008) Loading rate effect on pullout behavior of deformed steel fibers. ACI Mater J 105:576–584Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu M, Hallinan B, Wille K (2016) Effect of loading rates on pullout behavior of high strength steel fibers embedded in ultra-high performance concrete. Cem Concr Compos 70:98–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bindiganavile V, Banthia N (2001) Polymer and steel fiber-reinforced cementitious composites under impact loading—part 1: bond-slip response. ACI Mater J 98:17–24Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhutta A, Farooq M, Borges PHR, Banthia N (2018) Influence of fiber inclination angle on bond-slip behavior of different alkali-activated composites under dynamic and quasi-static loadings. Cem Concr Res 107:236–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tai YS, El-Tawil S, Chung TH (2016) Performance of deformed steel fibers embedded in ultra-high performance concrete subjected to various pullout rates. Cem Concr Res 89:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boshoff WP, Mechtcherine V, van Zijl GPAG (2009) Characterising the time-dependant behaviour on the single fibre level of SHCC: part 2: the rate effects on fibre pull-out tests. Cem Concr Res 39:787–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nieuwoudt PD, Boshoff WP (2017) Time-dependent pull-out behaviour of hooked-end steel fibres in concrete. Cem Concr Compos 79:133–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babafemi AJ, Boshoff WP (2017) Pull-out response of macro synthetic fibre from concrete matrix: effect of loading rate and embedment length. Constr Build Mater 135:590–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banthia N, Krishnadev MR (1990) Steel-fiber cementitious matrix load relaxation studies using a screw-driven testing machine. Exp Tech 14:41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banthia N, Pigeon M (1989) Load relaxation in steel fibres embedded in cement matrices. Int J Cem Compos Light Concr 11:229–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(89)90103-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Babafemi AJ, Boshoff WP (2015) Tensile creep of macro-synthetic fibre reinforced concrete (MSFRC) under uni-axial tensile loading. Cem Concr Compos 55:62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abrishambaf A, Barros JAO, Cunha VMCF, Frazão C (2017) Time dependent behaviour of fibre pull-out in self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Compos 77:14–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim DJ, El-Tawil S, Naaman AE (2009) Rate-dependent tensile behavior of high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Mater Struct 42:399–414.  https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9390-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kanda T, Li VC (1998) Interface property and apparent strength of high-strength hydrophilic fiber in cement matrix. J Mater Civ Eng 10:5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:1(5) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naaman AE, Namur G, Najm H, Alwan J (1989) Bond mechanisms in fiber reinforced cement-based compositesGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shokrieh MM, Omidi MJ (2009) Tension behavior of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites under different strain rates. Compos Struct 88:595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Naik NK, Yernamma P, Thoram NM et al (2010) High strain rate tensile behavior of woven fabric E-glass/epoxy composite. Polym Test 29:14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoo DY, Kim S (2019) Comparative pullout behavior of half-hooked and commercial steel fibers embedded in UHPC under static and impact loads. Cem Concr Compos 97:89–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations