Advertisement

Corrosion of Metallic Fasteners in Timber–Concrete Composite Structures

  • Wei ShiEmail author
  • Ueli M. Angst
  • Deniz Yilmaz
  • Kaja Wenk
  • Andrea Frangi
Original Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

While Timber–Concrete Composite (TCC) construction has been intensively studied in terms of structural behaviour, there is little research on the risk of corrosion of the used metallic shear fasteners in different exposure environments. Due to the marked differences in chemical environments of wood and concrete, however, it can be expected that the fasteners are subject to galvanic corrosion. This was experimentally studied in the present work. TCC specimens were fabricated for electrochemical testing and exposed to two different exposure environments, that is, 95% relative humidity and immersion in water. The moisture content in the wood, the difference in electrochemical potentials and the galvanic current were monitored over 2 months. Two types of fasteners were tested, namely zinc galvanized steel fasteners as well as browned fasteners that have been widely used in the TCC construction industry since 2013. It was found that the fastener parts in the wood generally act as an anode, while the remaining parts in the concrete act as a cathode. However, significant galvanic currents were only observed upon immersion in water. For practical applications in structural engineering, it is concluded that the mass loss of metal of the studied fasteners cannot present a severe risk for structures, especially not at the service classes 1 and 2 according to EN 1995-1-1.

Keywords

Corrosion Steel fastener Galvanic current Timber–concrete composite 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11527_2019_1358_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6475 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ceccotti A (2002) Composite concrete-timber structures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 4(3):264–275.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weinand Y, Hudert M (2010) Timberfabric: applying textile principles on a building scale. Archit Design 80(4):102–107.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Comité Européen de Normalisation (2004) Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures–Part 1–1: General-Common rules and rules for buildings. EN 1995-1-1, + A2: 2014. Belgium, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meierhofer U (1990) Metallkorrosion in Holz. Schweizer Ingenieur und Architekt 108(24):696–698.  https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-77454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franke B, Franke S, Müller A, Schiere M. (2016) Long-term behaviour of moisture content in timber constructions–Relation to service classes. In: International network on timber engineering research (INTER), Graz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marder AR (2000) The metallurgy of zinc-coated steel. Prog Mater Sci 45(3):191–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00006-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelfi P, Giuriani E, Marini A (2002) Stud shear connection design for composite concrete slab and wood beams. J Struct Eng 128(12):1544–1550.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:12(1544) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larsen HJ (2003) Introduction: Fasteners, joints and composite structures. In: Thelandersson S, Larsen HJ (eds) Timber engineering. Wiley, pp 303–313Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Branco JM, Cruz PJS, Piazza M (2009) Experimental analysis of laterally loaded nailed timber-to-concrete connections. Constr Build Mater 23(1):400–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeoh D, Fragiacomo M, Franceschi MD, Boon KH (2011) State of the art on timber-concrete composite structures: literature review. J Struct Eng 137(10):1085–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fragiacomo M (2012) Experimental behaviour of a full-scale timber-concrete composite floor with mechanical connectors. Mater Struct 45(11):1717–1735.  https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9869-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Comité Européen de Normalisation (2017) Steel rod, bars and wire for cold heading and cold extrusion. EN 10263, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramage MH, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah DU, Wu G, Yu L, Fleming P, DensleyTingley D, Allwood J, Dupree P, Linden PF, Scherman O (2017) The wood from the trees the use of timber in construction. Renew and Sustain Energy Rev 68(1):333–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Angst U, Vennesland Ø (2009) Detecting critical chloride content in concrete using embedded ion selective electrodes—effect of liquid junction and membrane potentials. Mater Corrosion 60(8):638–643.  https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.200905280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Angst U, Vennesland Ø, Myrdal R (2009) Diffusion potentials as source of error in electrochemical measurements in concrete. Mater Struct 42(3):365–375.  https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9387-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas S, Birbilis N, Venkatraman MS, Cole IS (2012) Corrosion of zinc as a function of pH. Corrosion 68(1):0150091–0150099.  https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3676630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andrada C, Alonso C (2004) Chapter 5 - Electrochemical aspects of galvanized reinforcement corrosion. In: Yeomans SR (ed) Galvanized steel reinforcement in concrete. Elsevier Science, pp 111–144Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bertolini L, Elsener B, Pedeferri P, Polder RP (2004) Cements and cement paste. In: Corrosion of steel in concrete: Prevention, diagnosis, repair. Wiley, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pourbaix M (1990) Thermodynamics and corrosion. Corros Sci 30(10):963–988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(90)90205-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stefanoni M, Angst UM, Elsener B (2018) Electrochemistry and capillary condensation theory reveal the mechanism of corrosion in dense porous media. Sci Rep 8(1):7407.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25794-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hornbostel K, Angst UM, Elsener B, Larsen CK, Geiker MR (2015) On the limitations of predicting the ohmic resistance in a macro-cell in mortar from bulk resistivity measurements. Cem Concr Res 76:147–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASTM International (2017) Standard practice for preparing, cleaning, and evaluating corrosion test specimens. ASTM G1–03 (2017) e1, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kordziel S, Glass SV, Pei S, Zelinka SL (2018) Tabares-Velasco PC Moisture monitoring and modeling of mass timber building systems. In: 2018 world conference on timber engineering, Seoul, Republic of Korea, August 20–23Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zelinka SL, Rammer DR (2012) Modeling the effect of nial corrosion on the lateral strength of joints. For Prod J 62(3):160–166.  https://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-62.3.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ueli M. Angst
    • 1
  • Deniz Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Kaja Wenk
    • 2
  • Andrea Frangi
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Building MaterialsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Institute for Structural EngineeringETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations