Advertisement

Alkali–silica reaction in plain and fibre concretes in field conditions

  • Graciela Giaccio
  • María Celeste Torrijos
  • Carlos Milanesi
  • Raúl ZerbinoEmail author
Original Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study on the effects of alkali–silica reaction (ASR) in concrete blocks placed outdoors, exposed to weather conditions. To promote different reaction kinetics and damage levels, the size of the reactive aggregates, the alkali content and incorporation of different fibre types (steel, polymer) were the variables considered. Expansions, crack patterns and air permeability were monitored for more than 3 years. In addition, standard expansion, compression and flexion tests were performed. The volume of concrete involved in ASR enhances the development of expansions and cracking; in the blocks different expansions were measured in vertical or horizontal directions and important cracks were observed. While the prisms expansions were attenuated after the first 12 months, in the blocks the damage by ASR continues growing for more than 3 years. Although the incorporation of macrofibers does not inhibit the development of ASR, it led to benefits such as reduction in cracking and deformations.

Keywords

Alkali–aggregate reaction Concrete Degradation Fibre reinforcement Mechanical properties Microcracking 

Abbreviations

ASR

Alkali–silica reaction

CMOD

Crack mouth opening displacement

E

Modulus of elasticity

FRC

Fibre reinforced concrete

fc

Cylinder compressive concrete strength

fL

Limit of proportionality

fR1

Residual flexural tensile strength corresponding to CMOD = 0.5 mm

fR3

Residual flexural tensile strength corresponding to CMOD = 2.5 mm

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding from projects National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) PIP 112-201101-00765 Development and characterization of fibre reinforced concretes for structural applications and PIP 112-201501-00861 Advances in fibre reinforced concretes, La Plata National University UNLP PPID2012 Damage processes in fibre reinforced concretes and UNLP 11/I188 Fibre reinforced concretes and their contribution to the sustainable development, as well as the collaboration of Cementos Avellaneda, Cementos Artigas and Maccaferri are greatly appreciated. The authors specially thank the collaboration of M.E. Bossio, P. Bossio, A. Gerez and D. Falcone in the support of experimental works.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    ACI Committee 221 (1998) State-of-the-art report on alkali aggregate reactivity. Report No. ACI 221-1R-98. American Concrete Institute, Farmington HillsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fournier B, Bérubé M-A (2000) Alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete: a review of basic concepts and engineering implications. Can J Civ Eng 27:167–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fava ASC, Manuele RJ, Colina JF, Cortelezzi CR (1961) Estudios y experiencias realizadas en el LEMIT sobre la reacción que se produce entre el cemento y los agregados, en el hormigón de cemento Portland. Revista LEMIT Serie II 85:43 (Argentina, in Spanish) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ponce JM, Batic OR (2006) Different manifestations of the alkali–silica reaction in concrete according to the reaction kinetics of the reactive aggregate. Cem Concr Res 36:1148–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heisig A, Urbonas L, Beddoe RE, Heinz D (2016) Ingress of NaCl in concrete with alkali reactive aggregate: effect on silicon solubility. Mater Struct 49:4291–4303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuksel C, Mardani-Aghabaglou A, Beglarigale A, Yazıcı H, Ramyar K, Andic-Cakır O (2016) Influence of water/powder ratio and powder type on alkali–silica reactivity and transport properties of self-consolidating concrete. Mater Struct 49:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zapala-Sławeta J (2017) The effect of meta-halloysite on alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete. Mater Struct 50:217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feiteira J, Custódio J, Sousa Ribeiro MS (2013) Review and discussion of polymer action on alkali–silica reaction. Mater Struct 46:1415–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lesnicki KJ, Kim J-Y, Kurtis KE, Jacobs LJ (2013) Assessment of alkali–silica reaction damage through quantification of concrete nonlinearity. Mater Struct 46:497–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ju TH, Achenbach JD, Jacobs LJ, Guimaraes M, Qu JM (2017) Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of alkali–silica reaction damage in concrete prism samples. Mater Struct 50(1):60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ling TC, Balachandran C, Munoz JF, Youtcheff J (2018) Chemical evolution of alkali–silicate reaction (ASR) products: a Raman spectroscopic investigation. Mater Struct 51:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivard P, Saint-Pierre F (2009) Assessing alkali-silica reaction damage to concrete with non-destructive methods: from the lab to the field. Constr Build Mater 23:902–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saint-Pierre F, Rivard P, Ballivy G (2007) Measurement of alkali–silica reaction progression by ultrasonic waves attenuation. Cem Concr Res 37:948–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berra M, Costa U, Mangialardi T, Paolini AE (2015) Application of an innovative methodology to assessing the alkali-silica reaction in concrete. Mater Struct 48:2727–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Multon S, Sellier A (2016) Multi-scale analysis of alkali–silica reaction (ASR): impact of alkali leaching on scale effects affecting expansion tests. Cem Concr Res 81:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallau W, Pirskawetz S, Voland K, Meng B (2018) Continuous expansion measurement in accelerated concrete prism testing for verifying ASR-expansion models. Mater Struct 51:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pleau R, Bérubé MA, Pigeon M, Fournier B, Raphaël S (1989) Mechanical behaviour of concrete affected by ASR. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Kyoto, Japan, pp 721–726Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giaccio G, Zerbino R, Ponce JM, Batic OR (2008) Mechanical behavior of concretes damaged by alkali–silica reaction. Cem Concr Res 38:993–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gautam BP, Panesar DK (2016) A new method of applying long-term multiaxial stresses in concrete specimens undergoing ASR, and their triaxial expansions. Mater Struct 49:3495–3508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Islam MS, Ghafoori N (2015) Relation of ASR-induced expansion and compressive strength of concrete. Mater Struct 48:4055–4066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Doran DK, More JFA (1989) Appraisal of the structural effects of alkali-silica reaction. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Kyoto, Japan, pp 677–682Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swamy RN, Al-Asali MM (1988) Engineering properties of concrete affected by alkali–silica reaction. ACI Mater J 85:367–374Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smaoui N, Bérubé MA, Fournier B, Bissonnette B (2004) Stresses induced by ASR in reinforced concrete incorporating various aggregates. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Beijing, China, pp 1191–1201Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qian C, Guo H, Wang J, Yan A (1996) Influence of alkali-aggregate reaction on flexural properties of steel fibre reinforced concrete. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Melbourne, Australia, pp 474–481Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haddad RH, Smadi MM (2004) Role of fibres in controlling unrestrained expansion and arresting cracking in Portland cement concrete undergoing alkali–silica reaction. Cem Concr Res 34(1):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pires de Carvalho MR, de Moraes Rego Fairbairn E, Dias Toledo Filho R, Chagas Cordeiro G, Hasparyk NP (2010) Influence of steel fibres on the development of alkali-aggregate reaction. Cem Concr Res 40(4):598–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lindgard J, Andiç-Çakır O, Fernandesc I, Rønning TF, Thomas MDA (2012) Alkali–silica reactions (ASR): literature review on parameters influencing laboratory performance testing. Cem Concr Res 42(2):223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giaccio G, Bossio ME, Torrijos MC, Zerbino R (2015) Contribution of fibre reinforcement in concrete affected by alkali–silica reaction. Cem Concr Res 67:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASTM Standards C1293 (2005) Standard test method for concrete aggregates by determination of length change of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM Standards C1260 (2007) Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (Mortar-Bar method). ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lindgard J, Thomas MDA, Sellevold EJ, Pedersen B, Andic-Cakır O, Justnes H, Rønning TF (2013) Alkali–silica reaction (ASR)—performance testing: influence of specimen pre-treatment, exposure conditions and prism size on alkali leaching and prism expansion. Cem Concr Res 53:68–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borchers I, Müller C (2014) 7 years of field site tests to assess the reliability of different laboratory test methods for evaluating the alkali-reactivity potential of aggregates. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ideker JH, Drimalas T, Bentivegna AF, Folliard KJ, Fournier B, Thomas MDA, Hooton RD, Rogers CA (2014) The importance of outdoor exposure site testing. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wigum BJ, Einarsson GJ (2016) Alkali aggregate reaction in Iceland—results from laboratory testing compared to field exposure site. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fournier B, Nkinamubanzi PC, Lu D, Thomas MDA, Follard KJ, Ideker JH (2006) Evaluating potential alkali-reactivity of concrete aggregates—how reliable are the current and new test methods?. In: Proceedings of MA Bérubé symposim on alkali-aggregate reactivity in concrete, Montréal, Canada, pp 21–44Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hooton RD, Rogers C, MacDonald CA, Ramlochan T (2013) Twenty-year field evaluation of alkali-silica reaction mitigation. ACI Mater J 110(5):539–548Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lindgard J, Sellevold EJ, Thomas MDA, Pedersen B, Justnes H, Rønning TF (2013) Performance testing: Influence of specimen pre-treatment, exposure conditions and prism size on concrete porosity, moisture state and transport properties. Cem Concr Res 53:145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    IRAM 1700 (2013) Aggregates. Method for the determination of length change in concrete prisms due to alkali-aggregate reaction (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    EN 14651:2005 Test method for metallic fibered concrete—measuring the flexural tensile strength (limit of proportionality (LOP), residual). CEN–European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Torrent R (1992) A two chamber vacuum cell for measuring the coefficient of air permeability of the concrete cover on site. Mater Struct 25:358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Romer M (2005) Recommendation of RILEM TC 189-NEC: ‘Non-destructive evaluation of the concrete cover’ comparative test—Part I—comparative test of penetrability’ methods. Mater Struct 38:895–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jones EK, Clark LA (1996) The effects of restraint on ASR expansion of reinforced concrete. Mag Conc Res 48(174):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Multon S, Barin FX, Godart B, Toutlemonde F (2008) Estimation of the residual expansion of concrete affected by alkali silica reaction. J Mater Civ Eng 20(1):54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Larive C, Laplaud A, Coussy O (2000) The role of water in Alkali-Silica Reaction. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on AAR, Quebec, Canada, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Larive C, Joly M, Coussy O (2000) Heterogeneity and anisotropy in ASR-affected concrete—consequences for structural assessment. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference AAR, Quebec, Canada, pp 919–928Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    ASTM C 1778-16 (2016) Standard guide for reducing the risk of deleterious alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gao X, Multon S, Cyr M, Sellier A (2011) Optimising an expansion test for the assessment of alkali–silica reaction in concrete structures. Mater Struct 44:1641–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lindgård J (2013) Alkali–silica reactions (ASR)—performance testing. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wigum BJ, Einarsson GJ (2016) Alkali aggregate reactions in Iceland. Results from laboratory testing compared to field exposure. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pedersen BM, Wigum BJ, Lindgård J (2016) Influence of aggregate particle size on the alkali silica reaction—a literature review. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smaoui N, Bissonnette B, Bérubé MA, Fournier B (2007) Stresses induced by alkali-silica reactivity in prototypes of reinforced concrete columns incorporating various types of reactive aggregates. Can J Civ Eng 34:1554–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Multon S, Seignol JF, Toutlemonde F (2005) Structural behavior of concrete beams affected by ASR. ACI Mater J 102(2):67–76Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Giaccio G, Torrijos MC, Tobes JM, Batic OR, Zerbino R (2009) Development of alkali-silica reaction under compressive loading and its effects on concrete behaviour. ACI Mat J 106(3):223–230Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wald D, Martínez GA, Bayrak O (2017) Expansion behaviour of a biaxially reinforced concrete member affected by ASR. Struct Conc 18:550–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wald DM, Allford MT, Bayrak O, Hrynyk TD (2017) Development and multiaxial distribution of expansions in reinforced concrete elements affected by alkali–silica reaction. Struct Conc 18:914–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bossio ME, Torrijos MC, Zerbino R, Giaccio G (2012) Pull out behaviour of macro synthetic fibres: effects of fibre type, matrix strength and microcracking. In: Proceedings of Bond in concrete 2012: Bond, anchorage, Detailing, fourth international symposium, Brescia, Italy, vol 2. Bond in new materials and under severe conditions, pp 901–906Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIC, Commission of Scientific Research, Department of Civil EngineeringLa Plata National UniversityLa PlataArgentina
  2. 2.CONICET, National Council of Scientific and Technological Research, Department of Civil EngineeringLa Plata National UniversityLa PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Cementos Avellaneda S.A.CABAArgentina
  4. 4.LEMIT, Commission of Scientific ResearchLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations