Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 52:9 | Cite as

Application of dispersant to slow down physical hardening process in asphalt binder

  • Yanjun Qiu
  • Haibo DingEmail author
  • Ali Rahman
  • Haoyuan Luo
Original Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Physical hardening in asphalt binder is recognized as one of the main factors leading to premature and excessive cracking in cold regions and high-altitude areas. To slow down the physical hardening process in asphalt binder, octyl aniline (OA), which is a commonly available non-ionic dispersant, was added to the asphalt binder. The effectiveness of OA in retarding the physical hardening process of the base asphalt binder was evaluated with an extended bending beam rheometer and critical-cracking temperature tests. Further, a thermal analysis was conducted to determine the glass transition temperature. The results showed that the one-step Laplace transformation method is an alternative to the asphalt binder thermal-stress calculation. Moreover, adding a sufficient amount of OA significantly decreased the magnitude of physical hardening in the base asphalt binder. The amphiphilic structure of OA can inhibit the aggregation of asphaltenes to a certain extent, which might be the main reason leading to a lower magnitude of physical hardening in the OA-modified asphalt binder.

Keywords

Octyl aniline Low-temperature Physical hardening Asphalt binder Reversible aging 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51778541. Haibo Ding is thankful to the China Scholarship Council for the financial support that was provided to study at Queen’s University, Canada.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ling M, Luo X, Chen Y, Gu F, Lytton RL (2018) Mechanistic-empirical models for top-down cracking initiation of asphalt pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 19(4):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ling M, Luo X, Hu S, Gu F, Lytton RL (2017) Numerical modeling and artificial neural network for predicting J-Integral of top-down cracking in asphalt pavement. J Transp Res Board 2631:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hesp S, Soleimani A, Subramani S, Phillips T, Smith D, Marks P, Tam K (2009) Asphalt pavement cracking: analysis of extraordinary life cycle variability in eastern and northeastern Ontario. Int J Pavement Eng 10(3):209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sui C, Farrar M, Tuminello W, Turner T (2010) New technique for measuring low-temperature properties of asphalt binders with small amounts of material. J Transp Res Board 2179:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim SS, Wysong Z, Kovach J (2006) Low-Temperature thermal cracking of asphalt binder by asphalt binder cracking device. J Transp Res Board 1962:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoare T, Hesp S (2000) Low-temperature fracture testing of asphalt binders: regular and modified systems. J Transp Res Board 1728:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bahia H, Anderson D (1993) Glass transition behavior and physical hardening of asphalt binders. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 62:93–129Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radi M, Akentuna M, Kim SS (2018) Effects of cooling rate and physical hardening on strengh and low-temperature cracking of asphalt binder. In: Proceedings of the 97th annual meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB), TRB, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basu A, Marasteanu M, Hesp S (2003) Time-temperature superposition and physical hardening effects in low-temperature asphalt binder grading. J Transp Res Board 1829:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bahia H, Velasquez R (2010) Understanding the mechanism of low temperature physical hardening of asphalt binders. In: Proceedeings of the 55th annual meeting of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association(CTAA), CTAA, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manolis S, Kuckarek A, Macinnis K, Brown A (2016) Understanding physical hardening in asphalt materials and pavements—a literature review. In: Proceedeings of the 61th annual meeting of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association(CTAA), CTAA, BanffGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cerni G, Cardone F, Colagrande S (2011) Low-temperature tensile behaviour of asphalt binders: application of loading time–temperature–conditioning time superposition principle. Constr Build Mater 25(4):2133–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hesp S, Iliuta S, Shirokoff JW (2007) Reversible aging in asphalt binders. Energy Fuels 21(2):1112–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soenen H, Visscher JD, Vanelstraete A, Redelius P (2006) Influence of thermal history on rheological properties of various bitumen. Rheol Acta 45(5):729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santagata E, Baglieri O, Dalmazzo D, Tsantilis L (2016) Experimental investigation on the combined effects of physical hardening and chemical ageing on low temperature properties of bituminous binders. In: Proceedeings of the 8th RILEM international symposium on testing and characterization of sustainable and innovative bituminous materials, RILEM, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Angius E, Ding H, Hesp S (2018) Durability assessment of asphalt binder. Constr Build Mater 165:264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang D, Cannone Falchetto A, Riccardi C, Wistuba MP (2019) Investigation on the effect of physical hardening and aging condition on low-temperature properties of asphalt binder based on BBR. In: Proceedeings of the RILEM 252-CMB-symposium on chemo mechanical characterization of bituminous materials, RILEM, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freeston J-L, Gillespie G, Hesp S, Paliukaite M, Taylor R (2015) Physical hardening in asphalt. In: Proceedeings of the 60th annual meeting of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association(CTAA), CTAA, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nam K, Bahia H (2009) Effect of modification on fracture failure and thermal-volumetric properties of asphalt binders. J Mater Civ Eng 21(5):198–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anderson D, Marasteanu M (1999) Physical hardening of asphalt binders relative to their glass transition temperatures. J Transp Res Board 1661:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Claudy P, Letoffe J, Rondelez F, King G (1992) A new interpretation of time-dependent physical hardening in asphalt based on DSC and optical thermoanalysis. Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 37:1408–1426Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merusi F, Polacco G, Filippi S, Giuliani F (2013) Structural transitions and physical networks in wax-modified bitumens. Road Mater Pavement Des 14(2):289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kriz P, Stastna J, Zanzotto L (2008) Physical aging in semi-crystalline asphalt binders. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 77:795–826Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ling M, Luo X, Gu F, Lytton RL (2017) An inverse approach to determine complex modulus gradient of field-aged asphalt mixtures. Mater Struct 50(2):138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ling M, Luo X, Gu F, Lytton RL (2017) Time-temperature-aging-depth shift functions for dynamic modulus master curves of asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 157:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ding H, Tetteh N, Hesp S (2017) Preliminary experience with improved asphalt cement specifications in the City of Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Constr Build Mater 157:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ouyang C, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2006) Improving the aging resistance of asphalt by addition of zinc dialkyldithiophosphate. Fuel 85(7):1060–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reinke G, Baumgardner G, Hanz A, King S (2017) Investigation of sterol chemistry to retard the aging of asphalt binders. J Transp Res Board 2633:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ding H, Qiu Y, Rahman A, Wang W (2018) Low-temperature reversible aging properties of coal liquefaction residue modified asphalt. Mater Struct 51(3):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yee P, Aida B, Hesp S, Marks P, Tam K (2006) Analysis of premature low-temperature cracking in three Ontario, Canada, pavements. J Transp Res Board 1962:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnson K, Hesp S (2014) Effect of waste engine oil residue on quality and durability of SHRP materials reference library binders. J Transp Res Board 2444:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pauli T, Grimes W, Beiswenger J, Schmets AJM (2014) Surface structuring of wax in complex media. J Mater Civ Eng 27(8):C4014001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qiu Y, Ding H, Rahman A, Wang W (2018) Damage characteristics of waste engine oil bottom rejuvenated asphalt binder in the non-linear range and its microstructure. Constr Build Mater 174:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qiu Y, Ding H, Rahman A, Yang E (2018) Using combined Avrami–Ozawa method to evaluate low-temperature reversible aging in asphalt binders. Road Mater Pavement Des.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1479291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Al-Sahhaf TA, Fahim MA, Elkilani AS (2002) Retardation of asphaltene precipitation by addition of toluene, resins, deasphalted oil and surfactants. Fluid Phase Equilib 194–197:1045–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lu X, Isacsson U (2000) Laboratory study on the low temperature physical hardening of conventional and polymer modified bitumens. Constr Build Mater 14(2):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Edwards Y, Tasdemir Y, Isacsson U (2006) Influence of commercial waxes and polyphosphoric acid on bitumen and asphalt concrete performance at low and medium temperatures. Mater Struct 39(7):725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tabatabaee H, Velasquez R, Bahia H (2012) Predicting low temperature physical hardening in asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 34(3):162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2017) Determination of performance grade of physically aged asphalt binder using extended bending beam rheometer (BBR) method. TP122-17, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marasteanu M, Anderson D (1996) Time-temperature dependency of asphalt binders-an improved model. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 65:408–448Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hopkins JL, Hamming RW (1957) On creep and relaxation. J Appl Phys 28(8):906–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Falchetto AC, Moon KH, Wistuba MP (2017) An alternative method for computing thermal stress in asphalt mixture: the Laplace transformation. Road Mater Pavement Des 18(sup2):226–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stehfest H (1970) Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transform. Commun ACM 13(1):47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shenoy A (2002) Single-event cracking temperature of asphalt pavements directly from bending beam rheometer data. J Transp Eng 128(5):465–471MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ding H, Gyasi J, Hesp S, Marks P, Nie Y, Somuah M, Tabib S, Tetteh N, Ubaid I (2018) Performance grading of extracted and recovered asphalt cements. Constr Build Mater 187:996–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanjun Qiu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haibo Ding
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ali Rahman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haoyuan Luo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Highway Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan ProvinceSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations