Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 51:168 | Cite as

The effect of realistic curing temperature on the strength and E-modulus of concrete

  • Anja Estensen Klausen
  • Terje Kanstad
  • Øyvind Bjøntegaard
  • Erik J. Sellevold
Original Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The strength and E-modulus of concrete are decisive parameters when it comes to ultimate limit state design, serviceability limit state design, and early age crack assessment. The properties of concrete are generally determined in the laboratory under 20 °C isothermal conditions and then used as the basis for calculations under realistic temperature conditions. It is well-known, however, that the curing temperature affects both the rate of property development in concrete and the “final value” of a given property. The current study investigated the effect of a realistic temperature history on the compressive cube strength, the tensile strength, and the tensile E-modulus for two concretes, a reference concrete and a fly ash concrete. Concrete specimens were subjected to either (1) 20 °C isothermal curing conditions, or (2) realistic temperature curing conditions for 14 days and then 20 °C isothermal conditions, until they were tested after 28 and 91 days. Parallel tests performed in a Temperature-Stress Testing Machine were also used to evaluate the results. The reference concrete showed a general reduction in strength and E-modulus when subjected to a realistic curing temperature, whereas the fly ash concrete showed an 11% increase in the 28-day E-modulus when cured under realistic temperature conditions. Furthermore, in both isothermal and realistic curing temperature conditions, the fly ash concrete showed a pronounced property development beyond 28 days, which could not be described by the material model currently used.

Keywords

Concrete Strength Property development Temperature Fly ash 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article is based on work carried out in the user-driven research-based innovation project DaCS (Durable advanced Concrete Solutions, 2015–2019) in addition to COIN (Concrete Innovation Centre, 2007–2014) (www.sintef.no/en/projects/coin/coinp). COIN was a centre for research-based innovation established by the Research Council of Norway.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

References

  1. 1.
    Neville AM (2011) Properties of Concrete, 5th edn. Pearson, Harlow. ISBN 9780273755807Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herholdt AD, Justesen CFP, Nepper-Christensen P, Nielsen A (1979) Beton-bogen. Aalborg Portland, Aalborg. ISBN 8798081608Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Möller G, Petersons N, Samuelsson P, Börtemark I, Karlsson I, Bergström SG (1982) Betong-handbok. AB Svensk Byggtjänst, Stockholm. ISBN 91-7332-060-9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Weerdt K, Ben Haha M, Le Saout G, Kjellsen KO, Justnes H, Lothenbach B (2012) The effect of temperature on the hydration of composite cements containing limestone powder and fly ash. Mater Struct 45(7):1101–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    fib Bulletin No. 70 (2013) Code-type models for structural behaviour of concrete: Background of the constitutive relations and material models in the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. ISBN: 978-2-88394-110-6, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindgård J, Sellevold EJ (1993) Is high strength concrete more robust against elevated temperatures? In: Holand I, Sellevold EJ (eds) Utilization of high strength concrete (proceedings of a symposium in Lillehammer, Norway), vol 2. ISBN 82-91341-00-1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanstad T, Hammer TA, Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2003) Mechanical properties of young concrete: part I: experimental results related to test methods and temperature effects. Mater Struct 36(4):218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klausen AE (2016) Early age crack assessment of concrete structures, experimental determination of decisive parameters. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. ISBN 978-82-326-1850-7 [printed ver.]. ISBN 978-82-326-1851-4 [electronic ver.]. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2430293. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
  9. 9.
    Klausen AE, Kanstad T, Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2017) Comparison of tensile and compressive creep of fly ash concretes in the hardening phase. Cem Concr Res 95(2017):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klausen AE, Kanstad T, Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2018) The effect of curing temperature on autogenous deformation of fly ash concretes (Under review)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NS 3657:1993 (1993) Concrete testing—determination of heat release. Standards Norway, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    NS-EN 12390-3:2009 (2009) Testing hardened concrete - Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. Standard Norge, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen EA (1991) Time dependent tensile fracture of concrete. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. ISBN: 8271193376Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boulay C, Staquet S, Delsaute B, Carette J, Crespini M, Yazoghli-Marzouk O, Merliot É, Ramanich S (2014) How to monitor the modulus of elasticity of concrete, automatically since the earliest age? Mater Struct 47(1–2):141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    JEJMS Concrete AB (2009–2012) CrackTeSt COIN, Version 1.3 edn., Luleå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    COIN (2007–2014) Concrete Innovation Centre—a centre for research-based innovation. Established by the Research Council of Norway, Norway. https://www.sintef.no/en/projects/coin/coinp. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
  17. 17.
    Kjellmark G, Klausen AE (2015) Mechanical properties and calculation of model parameters for concrete with NORCEM cement and variable fly ash content. COIN project report (55), SINTEF building and infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway. ISBN: 978-82-536-1454-0. https://www.sintefbok.no/book/index/1084. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
  18. 18.
    Freiesleben Hansen P (1978) Curing technology - 1, Portland cement (in Danish: Hærdeteknologi - 1, Portlandcement). BKF-Centralen, Lyngby, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pedersen EJ (1994) Appendix 1. Curing of concrete structures. In: Béton CE-ID (ed) Durable concrete structures: design guide, 2nd edn. Thomas Telford, Scotland, pp 86–104. ISBN 9780727739544Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    fib (1991) CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: design code. CEB bulletin no. 203. Comité Euro-International du Béton, Lausanne. ISBN: 0727716964. ISBN: 9780727735430Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanstad T, Hammer TA, Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2002) Mechanical properties of young concrete: part II: determination of model parameters and test program proposals. Mater Struct 36(4):226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bjøntegaard Ø (2011): Basis for and practical approaches to stress calculations and crack risk estimation in hardening concrete structures—state of the art. COIN project REPORT 31. SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway. ISBN: 978-82-536-1236-2. https://www.sintefbok.no/book/index/1012. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
  23. 23.
    Jonasson J-E, Fjellström P, Bäckström H (2010) Inverkan av variabel härdningstemperatur på betongens hållfasthetsutveckling (The influence of variable curing temperature on the strength development of concrete—only available in Swedish). Bygg & Teknik (7)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Byfors J (1980) Plain concrete at early ages. CBI forskning/research 3:80. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan AA, Cook WD, Mitchell D (1996) Tensile strength of low, medium, and high-strength concretes at early ages. ACI Mater J 93(5):487–493Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanstad T, Hammer TA, Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2001) Mechanical properties of young concrete: evaluation of test methods for tensile strength and modulus of elasticity. Determination of model parameters, IPACS Report. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. ISBN: 91-89580-49-4Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshitake I, Zhang W, Mimura Y, Saito T (2013) Uniaxial tensile strength and tensile Young’s modulus of fly-ash concrete at early age. Constr Build Mater 40(2013):514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Schutter G, Taerwe L (1996) Degree of hydration-based description of mechanical properties of early age concrete. Mater Struct 29(1996):335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sellevold EJ, Hauck CJ (1997): Effect of curing temperature and silica fume on the pore structure of hardened cement paste. Report TVBM-3078. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, pp 164–169. ISSN: 0348-7911 TVBMGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jonasson J-E, Emborg M, Hedlund H (2014) Measurement and modelling of strength and heat of hydration for Young concrete. Nordic Concr Res 50(2014):501–504Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Munch-Petersen GN, Munch-Petersen C (2014) Early property development in concrete. Nordic Concr Res 51(2014):1–14Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shkoukani H, Walraven J (1991) Sustained tensile strength of concrete. IABSE reports 62 (1991), pp 725–729. https://www.e-periodica.ch/digbib/view?pid=bse-re-003:1991:62::120#868
  33. 33.
    Bjøntegaard Ø, Sellevold EJ (2003) Bjørvika senketunnel, Fase I—Bestemmelse av betongegenskaper relevante for evaluering av risstendens i herdefasen (Bjørvika submerged tunnel, phase I—determination of material parameters relevant for crack risk assessment). Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bjøntegaard Ø (2004) Bjørvika senketunnel, Fase II—Bestemmelse av betongegenskaper relevante for evaluering av risstendens i herdefasen (Bjørvika submerged tunnel, Phase II—Determination of material parameters relevant for crack risk assessment). Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim J-K, Han SH, Song YC (2002) Effect of temperature and aging on the mechanical properties of concrete. Part I. Experimental results. Cem Concr Res 32(7):1087–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Estensen Klausen
    • 1
  • Terje Kanstad
    • 1
  • Øyvind Bjøntegaard
    • 2
  • Erik J. Sellevold
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Public Roads AdministrationTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations