Materials and Structures

, 51:149 | Cite as

Experimental study of bitumen emulsion–cement mortars: mechanical behaviour and relation to mixtures

  • Chiara Mignini
  • Fabrizio Cardone
  • Andrea GrazianiEmail author
Original Article


Cold bitumen emulsion mixtures are eco-friendly materials for road pavement construction. Portland cement and other supplementary cementitious materials are added to the mixtures to improve their performance. In bitumen emulsion–cement (BEC) mixtures, the two binders affect the mechanical behaviour and the curing process. In this research, BEC mixtures are considered as multiphase composite materials consisting of a mortar matrix and coarse aggregate inclusions. The main objectives are to identify the composition of BEC mortar phase and to compare mixtures and mortars throughout the curing process. Starting from two BEC mixtures containing 80% reclaimed asphalt, eighteen mortars were manufactured by changing their water and air voids content. Then, two design composition were selected to analyse the curing process by monitoring indirect tensile strength (ITS), indirect tensile stiffness modulus (ITSM) and moisture loss. Results showed that the short-term ITS of mortars (1 day of curing) increased by reducing their water and their air voids content. During curing (from 1 to 28 days), the mechanical properties (ITS and ITSM) of mixtures and mortars increased in a similar way. Unique relationships were identified between mortar and mixture properties, regardless of bitumen to cement (B/C) ratio, curing time and curing condition. In terms of predictive behaviour, the design composition slightly underestimated mixture stiffness and overestimated mixture strength.


Cold paving technologies Bitumen emulsion Cement Mortar Curing 



The Authors wish to express their gratitude to Valli Zabban S.p.A. and to Società Cooperativa Braccianti Riminese Companies for providing the bitumen emulsion and the reclaimed asphalt aggregate.


This study was funded by Italcementi—HeidelbergCement Group (Grant Number 2200700).


  1. 1.
    Asphalt Institute (2008) A basic asphalt emulsion manual, manual series no. 19, 4th edn. Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang X, Garcia-Hernandez A, Lura P (2016) Overview on cold cement bitumen emulsion asphalt. RILEM Tech Lett 1:116–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stimilli A, Ferrotti G, Graziani A, Canestrari F (2013) Performance evaluation of a cold-recycled mixture containing high percentage of reclaimed asphalt. Road Mater Pavement Des 14(sup1):149–161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dolzycki B, Jaczewski M, Szydlowski C (2017) The long-term properties of mineral-cement-emulsion mixtures. Constr Build Mater 156:799–808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown S, Needham D (2000) A study of cement modified bitumen emulsion mixtures. Asph Paving Technol 69:92–121Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fang X, Garcia A, Winnefeld F, Partl MN, Lura P (2016) Impact of rapid-hardening cements on mechanical properties of cement bitumen emulsion asphalt. Mater Struct 49(1–2):487–498. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dulaimi A, Al Nageim H, Ruddock F, Seton L (2017) High performance cold asphalt concrete mixture for binder course using alkali-activated binary blended cementitious filler. Constr Build Mater 141:160–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kavussi A, Modarres A (2010) Laboratory fatigue models for recycled mixes with bitumen emulsion and cement. Constr Build Mater 24(10):1920–1927. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz CW, Diefenderfer BK, Bowers BF (2017) Material properties of cold in-place recycled and full-depth reclamation asphalt concrete (no. project 09-51)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graziani A, Mignini C, Bocci E, Bocci M (2018) Complex modulus of cold recycled mixtures: measurement and modelling. In: 13th ISAP conference on asphalt pavements. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 19–21 June, 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serfass JP, Poirier JE, Henrat JP, Carbonneau X (2004) Influence of curing on cold mix mechanical performance. Mater Struct 37(5):365–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cardone F, Grilli A, Bocci M, Graziani A (2015) Curing and temperature sensitivity of cement–bitumen treated materials. Int J Pavement Eng. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graziani A, Godenzoni C, Cardone F, Bocci M (2016) Effect of curing on the physical and mechanical properties of cold-recycled bituminous mixtures. Mater Des 95:358–369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Du S (2018) Effect of curing conditions on properties of cement asphalt emulsion mixture. Constr Build Mater 164:84–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson RF (1994) Principles of composite material mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pichler C, Lackner R, Aigner E (2012) Generalized self-consistent scheme for upscaling of viscoelastic properties of highly-filled matrix-inclusion composites–application in the context of multiscale modeling of bituminous mixtures. Compos Part B: Eng 43(2), 457–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Underwood BS (2015) Multiscale modeling approach for asphalt concrete and its implications on oxidative aging. In: Advances in asphalt materials, pp 273–302.
  18. 18.
    Allen DH, Little DN, Soares RF, Berthelot C (2017) Multi-scale computational model for design of flexible pavement—part I: expanding multi-scaling. Int J Pavement Eng 18(4):309–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Underwood BS, Kim YR (2011) Experimental investigation into the multiscale behaviour of asphalt concrete. Int J Pavement Eng 12(4):357–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Underwood BS, Kim YR (2013) Microstructural investigation of asphalt concrete for performing multiscale experimental studies. Int J Pavement Eng 14(5):498–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim YR (2003) Mechanistic fatigue characterization and damage modeling of asphalt mixtures. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Underwood BS, Kim YR (2013) Effect of volumetric factors on the mechanical behavior of asphalt fine aggregate matrix and the relationship to asphalt mixture properties. Constr Build Mater 49:672–681. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim H, Buttlar WG (2009) Multi-scale fracture modeling of asphalt composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 69(15–16):2716–2723. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caro S, Masad E, Bhasin A, Little D (2010) Micromechanical modeling of the influence of material properties on moisture-induced damage in asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 24(7):1184–1192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Izadi A, Bhasin A, Motamed A (2011) Designing Fine aggregate mixtures to evaluate fatigue crack growth in asphalt mixtures (no. SWUTC/11/161022-1). Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sousa P, Kassem E, Masad E, Little D (2013) New design method of fine aggregates mixtures and automated method for analysis of dynamic mechanical characterization data. Constr Build Mater 41:216–223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neumann J, Simon JW, Mollenhauer K, Reese S (2017) A framework for 3D synthetic mesoscale models of hot mix asphalt for the finite element method. Constr Build Mater 148:857–873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dai Q, Sadd MH, Parameswaran V, Shukla A (2005) Prediction of damage behaviors in asphalt materials using a micromechanical finite-element model and image analysis. J Eng Mech 131:668–677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fu J, Zhang X, Wang F (2015) The meso structure and strain distribution analysis of cement emulsified asphalt concrete. Int J Pavement Res Technol 8(3):179–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fu J, Yang Y, Zhang X, Wang F (2018) Different strain distributions of cement-emulsified asphalt concrete pavement between the macro-and meso-scale. Road Mater Pavement Des 19(2):470–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miljković M, Radenberg M (2014) Fracture behaviour of bitumen emulsion mortar mixtures. Constr Build Mater 62:126–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miljković M, Radenberg M (2015) Characterising the influence of bitumen emulsion on asphalt mixture performance. Mater Struct 48(7):2195–2210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miljković M, Radenberg M, Fang X, Lura P (2017) Influence of emulsifier content on cement hydration and mechanical performance of bitumen emulsion mortar. Mater Struct 50(3):185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EN 196-1, Methods of testing cement—Part 1: determination of strength, 2016Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Godenzoni C, Graziani A, Corinaldesi V (2016) The influence mineral additions on the failure properties of bitumen emulsion mortars. In: 8th RILEM international conference on mechanisms of cracking and debonding in pavements. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 327–333Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    EN 13808 (2013) Bitumen and bituminous binders–framework for specifying cationic bituminous emulsionsGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    EN 197-1 (2011) Cement—part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cementsGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    EN 196-6 (2010) Methods of testing cement—part 6: determination of finenessGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grilli A, Graziani A, Bocci M (2012) Compactability and thermal sensitivity of cement–bitumen-treated materials. Road Mater Pavement Des 13(4):599–617. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grilli A, Graziani A, Bocci E, Bocci M (2016) Volumetric properties and influence of water content on compactability of recycled mixtures. Mater Struct 49(10):4349–4362. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lesueur D, Potti JJ (2004) Cold mix design: a rational approach based on the current understanding of the breaking of bituminous emulsions. Road Mater Pavement Des 5(sup1):65–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    EN 12697-26 (2012) Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 26: stiffnessGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    EN 12697-23 (2003) Bituminous mixtures—test methods for hot mix asphalt–part 23: determination of the indirect tensile strength of bituminous specimenGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Graziani A, Godenzoni C, Cardone F, Bocci E, Bocci M (2017) An application of the Michaelis–Menten model to analyze the curing process of cold recycled bituminous mixtures. Int J Pavement Res Technol 10(1):62–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos B Eng 39(6):933–961. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hashin Z (1983) Analysis of composite materials—a survey. J Appl Mech 50(3):481–505. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    García A, Lura P, Partl MN, Jerjen I (2013) Influence of cement content and environmental humidity on asphalt emulsion and cement composites performance. Mater Struct 46(8):1275–1289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jensen OM, Hansen PF (2001) Water-entrained cement-based materials: I. Principles and theoretical background. Cem Concr Res 31(4):647–654. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile e Architettura Via Brecce BiancheUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations