Materials and Structures

, 50:253 | Cite as

Effect of temperature on the sorption curves of earthen materials

  • Antonin Fabbri
  • Fionn McGregor
  • Ines Costa
  • Paulina Faria
Original Article
  • 247 Downloads

Abstract

Unfired earth is a sustainable construction material with low embodied energy, but its development requires a better evaluation of its moisture–thermal buffering abilities and its mechanical behavior. Both of them are known to strongly depend on the amount of water contained in its porous network and its evolution with external conditions (temperature, humidity), which can be assessed through several sorption–desorption curves at different temperature. However, the direct measurement of these curves is particularly time consuming (up to 2 month per curve) and thus, indirect means of their determination appear of main importance for evident time saving and economical reasons. In this context, this paper focuses on the prediction of the evolution of sorption curves with temperature on earth plasters and compacted earth samples. For that purpose, two methods are proposed. The first one is an adaptation of the isosteric method, which gives the variation of relative humidity with temperature at constant water content. The second one, based on the liquid–gas interface equilibrium, gives the variation of water content with temperature at constant relative humidity. These two methods lead to quite consistent and complementary results. It underlines their capability to predict the sorption curves of the tested materials at several temperatures from the sole knowledge of one sorption curve at a given temperature. Finally, these predictions are used to scan the range of temperature variation within which the evolution of water content with temperature at constant humidity could be neglected or should be taken into account.

Keywords

Vapor sorption in porous media Latent heat of sorption/desorption Hygroscopic behavior Earthen material 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This present work has been supported by the French national research agency ANR, though the project BioTerra (ANR-13-VBDU-0005) and has received funding from the People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Unions Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102, through the PRESTIGE program coordinated by Campus France. The authors are indebted to Joao Rodrigues Ferreira for its participation in the former experimentations on this subject during its internship at the ENTPE (from March to August 2016).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Harris D (1999) A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials. Build Environ 34:751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morel J, Mesbah A, Oggero M, Walker P (2001) Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Build Environ 36:1119–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liuzzi S, Hall M, Stefanizzi PP, Casey S (2013) Hygrothermal behaviour and relative humidity buffering of unfired and hydrated lime-stabilised clay composites in a mediterranean climate. Build Environ 61:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGregor F, Heath A, Shea A (2014) The moisture buffering capacity of unfired clay masonry. Build Environ 82:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soudani L, Fabbri A, Morel J, Woloszyn M, Chabriac P, Wong H, Grillet A (2016) Assessment of the validity of some common assumptions in hygrothermal modeling of earth based materials. Energy Build 116:498–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woloszyn M, Kalamees T, Abadie M, Steeman M, Kalagasidis AS (2009) The effect of combining a relative-humidity-sensitive ventilation system with the moisture buffering capacity of materials on indoor climate and energy efficiency of buildings. Build Environ 44:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bui QB, Morel JC (2009) Assessing the anisotropy of rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 23:3005–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Champiré F, Fabbri A, Morel J, Wong H, McGregor F (2016) Impact of hygrometry on mechanical behavior of compacted earth for building constructions. Constr Build Mater 110:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaquin P, Augarde C, Gallipoli D, Toll D (2009) The strength of unstabilised rammed earth materials. Géotechnique 59:487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carmeliet J, Descamps F, Houvenaghel G (1999) A mutliscale network model for simulating moisture transfer properties of porous media. Transp Porous Media 35:67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coussy O (2004) Poromechanics. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Derluyn H, Derome D, Carmeliet J, Stora E, Barbarulo R (2012) Hysteretic behavior of concrete: modeling and analysis. Cem Concr Res 42:1379–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou A (2013) A contact angle-dependent hysteresis model for soil–water retention behaviour. Comput Geotech 49:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poyet S, Charles S (2009) Temperature dependence of the sorption isotherms of cement-based materials: heat of sorption and clausius–clapeyron formula. Cem Concr Res 39:1060–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oumeziane Y, Moissette S, Bart M, Lanos C (2016) Influence of temperature on sorption process in hemp concrete. Constr Build Mater 106:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mihoubi D, Bellagi A (2006) Thermodynamic analysis of sorption isotherms of bentonite. J Chem Thermodyn 38:1105–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall M, Krayenhoff M, L R (2012) Modern earth buildings. Woodhead, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Labat M, Magniont C, Oudhof N, Aubert J (2016) From the experimental characterisation of the hygrothermal properties of straw-cvlay mixtures to the numerical assessment of their buffering potential. Build Environ 97:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lide D (1999) Handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barrett E, Joyner L, Halenda P (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I: computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fabbri A, Fen-Chong T (2013) Indirect measurement of the ice content curve of partially frozen cement based materials. J Cold Reg Eng 90–91:14–21Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Janssen H, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2007) Conservative modelling of the moisture and heat transfer in building components under atmospheric excitation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:1128–1140CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Künzel H (1995) Simultaneous heat and moisture transport in building components. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, SuttgartGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISO 12571:2013 (2013) Hygrothermal performance of building materials and products—determination of hygroscopic sorption properties. International Standard, p 18Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coussy O (2010) Mechanics and physics of porous solids. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LTDS-LGCB, UMR 5513 CNRS, ENTPEUniversité de LyonVaulx-en-VelinFrance
  2. 2.CERIS and Department of Civil EngineeringNOVA University of LisbonCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations