Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory and field evaluation of recycled unbound layers with cement for use in asphalt pavement rehabilitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of recycling techniques in the rehabilitation of old pavements has become an important tool for pavement engineering practices. The reduced costs and the scarce natural resources are the main reason for which the development and improvement of recycling processes have been studied by many researchers around the world. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the structural responses of an asphalt pavement after using deep recycling techniques of granular layers with an addition of cement for the rehabilitation of asphalt pavements. Laboratory analysis using resilient modulus, indirect tensile strength (ITS), and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests were performed for mixes with 5 and 6 % of cement content, two compaction energies and three curing periods. In the field, two sections using 250 and 300 mm thicknesses of a recycled base layer were constructed with 5.0 % of cement addition. An evaluation of these experimental test tracks was conducted by performing deflections and by mechanical characterization of samples extracted from the test site at different ages. The results indicated differences in UCS and ITS values for the laboratory mixes. Field specimens from the 300 mm-section presented higher stiffness than the 250 mm. Studies have shown that the resilient moduli determined from nondestructive test based on backcalculation procedures are similar from those determined in the laboratory through modulus of elasticity tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO T307 (2011) Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdo FY (2009) Cement-stabilized base courses. In: Concrete airport pavement workshop

  3. ABNT/NBR 8522 (2008) Concreto—Determinação dos Módulos de Elasticidade e de Deformação e da Curva Tensão-Deformação. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amini F (2005) Potential applications of paving fabrics to reduce reflective cracking, Final Report, FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-05-174, Jackson State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson, pp 1–32

  5. ARRA (2001) Basic asphalt recycling manual. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association, Annapolis

    Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM C39, C39M (2012) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM C496, C496M (2011) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM D1557 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM D2166, D2166M (2013) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  10. Balbo JT (2002) Materiais Estabilizados com Aglomerantes Hidráulicos para Pavimentos de Concreto de Cimento Portland, Curso de Especialização para Projetista de Pavimento de Concreto, Associação Brasileira de Cimento Portland, ABCP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil (in Portuguese)

  11. Baus RL, Li T (2006) Investigation of graded aggregate base (GAB) courses, Report No. FHWA/SC-06-03, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia

  12. Bejarano MO, Harvey JT (2004) Deep in-situ recycling of asphalt concrete pavements as granular base: design, construction and performance evaluation experience in California. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference on asphalt pavements for Southern Africa, Sun City

  13. Camargo FF, Wen H, Edil T, Son YH (2013) Comparative assessment of crushed aggregates and bound/unbound recycled asphalt pavement as base materials. Int J Pavement Eng 14(3):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chai GWK, Oh EYN, Balasubramaniam AS (2005) In-situ stabilization of road base using cement—a case study in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 15th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Seoul

  15. Dempsey BJ (2002) Development and performance of interlayer stress-absorbing composite in asphalt concrete overlays. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1809:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaspard KJ (2000) Evaluation of cement treated base courses, Technical Assistance Report no. 00-1TA, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge

  17. Grilli A, Bocci M, Tarantino AM (2013) Experimental investigation on fibre-reinforced cement-treated materials using reclaimed asphalt. Constr Build Mater 38:491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guthrie WS, Brown AV, Eggett DL (2007) Cement stabilization of aggregate base material blended with reclaimed asphalt pavement. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2026:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haichert R, Kelln R, Wandzura C, Berthelot C, Guenther D (2012) Cement stabilization of conventional granular base and recycled crushed Portland cement concrete. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2310:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isola M, Betti G, Marradi A, Tebaldi G (2013) Evaluation of cement treated mixtures with high percentage of reclaimed asphalt pavement. Constr Build Mater 48:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McConnell T (2008) A case study of a cement-stabilized aggregate base course on SC-5. In: 16th Annual ICAR symposium

  22. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2008) Concreto: Microestrutura, Propriedades e Materiais, 3rd edn. Pini, São Paulo (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller HJ, Guthrie WS, Crane RA, Smith B (2006) Evaluation of cement-stabilized full-depth-recycled base materials for frost and early traffic conditions. Recycled Materials Resource Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montepara A, Tebaldi G, Marradi A, Betti G (2012) Effect on pavement performance of a subbase layer composed by natural aggregate and RAP. In: Procedia: social and behavioral sciences, 5th international congress—sustainability of road infrastructures, vol 53, pp 980–989

  25. Nazarian S, Yuan D, Franco S, Moss SP (2012) Design and constructability of emulsion-stabilized bases for full-depth reclamation. Transportation Research Board, TRB, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pais J (2013) The reflective cracking in flexible pavements. Rom J Transp Infrastruct 2(1):63–87

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paul DK, Gnanendran CT (2011) Effect of loading rate on the properties of lightly stabilized granular materials by using flexural beam testing. In: 14th Pan-American CGS conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Toronto

  28. Peng Y, He Y (2009) Structural characteristics of cement-stabilized soil bases with 3D finite element method. Front Arch Civ Eng China 3(4):428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Putrin EE, Rao NSVK, Mannan MA (2010) Evaluation of the modulus of elasticity and resilient modulus for highway subgrades. Electron J Geotech Eng 15:1285–1293

    Google Scholar 

  30. Salomon A, Newcomb DE (2000) Cold in-place recycling literature review and preliminary mixture design procedure, Final Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Research Services, MnDOT, St. Paul

  31. Schimmoller VE, Holtz K, Eighmy TT, Wiles C, Smith M, Malasheskie G, Rohrbach GJ, Schaftlein S, Helms G, Campbell RD, Van Deusen CH, Ford B, Almborg JA (2000) Recycled materials in european highway environments: uses, technologies, and policies. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  32. Soares R, Haichert R, Podborochynski D, Guenther D, Berthelot C (2012) Modeling the in situ performance of granular materials stabilized with cement. In: 2012 Annual conference of the transportation association of Canada: characterization of granular and stabilized materials, New Brunswick

  33. Suleiman MT, Kevern JT, Schaefer VR, Wang K (2006) Effect of compaction energy on pervious concrete properties. In: Proceedings of the 2006 NRMCA concrete technology forum—focus on pervious concrete, Nashville

  34. Syed IM, Scullion T (2001) Performance evaluation of recycled and stabilized bases in Texas. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1757:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Terrel RL, Epps JA, Barenberg EJ, Mitchell JR, Thompson MR (1979) Soil stabilization in pavement structures, a user’s manual. Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trichês G, Santos A (2011) Avaliação do Desempenho da Reciclagem do Pavimento da Rodovia SC 303, 7 Congresso Brasileiro de Rodovias & Concessões, CBR&C, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, pp 29–41 (in Portuguese)

  37. Xiao Y, Tutumluer E, Qian Y, Siekmeier J (2012) Gradation effects influencing mechanical properties of aggregate base/granular subbase materials in Minnesota. Transportation Research Board, TRB, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yoder EJ, Witczak MW (1975) Principles of pavement design, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan D, Nazarian S, Hoyos LR, Puppala AJ (2011) Evaluation and mix design of cement-treated base materials with high RAP content. Transportation Research Board, TRB, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Capes, CNPq and ANTT, and also Arteris for providing the experimental site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iuri S. Bessa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bessa, I.S., Aranha, A.L., Vasconcelos, K.L. et al. Laboratory and field evaluation of recycled unbound layers with cement for use in asphalt pavement rehabilitation. Mater Struct 49, 2669–2680 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0675-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0675-6

Keywords

Navigation