Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 1045–1059 | Cite as

Flexural behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams under short-term loading

  • Ivan S. Ignjatović
  • Snežana B. Marinković
  • Zoran M. Mišković
  • Aleksandar R. Savić
Original Article

Abstract

Recycling of waste concrete is one of the sustainable solutions for the growing waste disposal crisis and depletion of natural aggregate sources. As a result, recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) is produced, and so far it has mostly been used in low-value applications such as for the pavement base. But, from the standpoint of promoting resource and energy savings and environmental preservation, it is essential to study whether a concrete made of recycled aggregates—recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) can be effectively used as a structural material. The experimental research presented in this paper is performed in order to investigate the flexural behavior of RAC beams when compared to the behavior of natural aggregate concrete (NAC) beams under short-term loading and consequently the possibility of using RAC in structural concrete elements. Three different percentages of coarse RCA in total mass of coarse aggregate in concrete mixtures (0 %—NAC, 50 %—RAC50, and 100 %—RAC100), and three different reinforcement ratios (0.28, 1.46, and 2.54 %) were the governing parameters in this investigation. Full-scale tests were performed on nine simply supported beams until the failure load had been reached. Comparison of load-deflection behavior, crack patterns, service deflections, failure modes and ultimate flexural capacity of NAC and RAC beams was made based on our own and other researchers’ test results. The results of conducted analysis showed that the flexural behavior of RAC beams is satisfactory comparing to the behavior of NAC beams, for both the service and ultimate loading. It is concluded that, within the limits of this research, the use of RAC in reinforced concrete beams is technically feasible.

Keywords

Recycled aggregate concrete Reinforced concrete beams Flexural behavior Short-term loading 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper is a part of the investigation within the research project TR36017 “Utilization of by-products and recycled waste materials in concrete composites in the scope of sustainable construction development in Serbia: investigation and environmental assessment of possible applications”, supported by the Ministry for Science and Technology, the Republic of Serbia. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajdukiewicz A, Kliszczewicz A (2002) Influence of recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of HS/HPC. Cem Concr Compos 24:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajdukiewicz A, Kliszczewicz A (2007) Comparative tests of beams and columns made of recycled aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 5(2):259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angulo SC, Carrijo PM, Figneiredo AD, Chaves AP, John VM (2010) On the classification of mixed construction and demolition waste aggregate by porosity and its impact on the mechanical performance of concrete. Mater Struct 43:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakradhara Rao M, Bhattacharyya SK, Barai SV (2011) Influence of field recycled coarse aggregate on properties of concrete. Mater Struct 44:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comité Européen de Normalisation (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures, part 1–1. Comité Européen de Normalisation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2002) DIN 4226-100: Aggregates for concrete and mortar, part 100—recycled aggregates. Deutsches Institut für Normung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Domingo A, Lazaro C, Gayarre FL, Serrano MA, Lopez-Colina C (2010) Long term deformations by creep and shrinkage in recycled aggregate concrete. Mater Struct 43:1147–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Etxeberria M, Marí AR, Vázquez E (2007) Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material. Mater Struct 40:529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí AR, Barra M (2007) Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Res 37:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fathifazl G (2008) Structural performance of steel reinforced recycled concrete members. Dissertation, University of Ottawa, pp 80–110Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fathifazl G, Razaqpur GA, Isgor BO, Abbas A, Fournier B, Foo S (2009) Flexural performance of steel-reinforced recycled concrete beams. ACI Struct J 106(6):858–867Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fathifazl G, Razaqpur GA, Isgor BO, Abbas A, Fournier B, Foo S (2011) Shear capacity evaluation of steel reinforced recycled concrete (RRC) beams. Eng Struct 33:1025–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalez-Fonteboa B, Martinez-Abella F (2007) Shear strenght of recycled concrete beams. Constr Build Mater 21:887–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    González-Fonteboa B, Martínez-Abella F, Eiras-Lopez J, Seara-Paz S (2011) Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on damage of recycled concrete. Mater Struct 44:1759–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen TC (1992) Recycled aggregates and recycled aggregate concrete, third state-of-the-art report 1945–1989. In: Hansen TC (ed) Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry. Taylor & Francis, Oxon, pp 1–160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hansen TC, Narud H (1983) Strength of recycled concrete made from crushed concrete coarse aggregate. Concr Int Design Const 5(1):79–83Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ignjatovic I, Marinkovic S, Savic A (2012) Mix design procedure for recycled aggregate concrete. In Conference: Civil engineering—science and practice. Zabljak, Montenegro (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li X (2008) Recycling and reuse of waste concrete in China. Part I. Material behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Limbachiya MC, Leelawat T, Dhir RK (2000) Use of recycled concrete aggregate in high-strength concrete. Mater Struct 33:574–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyer C (2002) Concrete and sustainable development. Special Publication ACI 206, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meyer C (2009) The greening of the concrete industry. Cem Concr Compos 31(8):601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marinković S, Radonjanin V, Malesev M, Ignjatović I (2010) Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. Waste Manag 30:2255–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marinković S, Ignjatović I, Radonjanin V, Malešev M (2012) RAC for structural use—an overview of technologies, properties and applications. In: Fardis M (ed) Innovative materials and techniques in concrete construction. Springer, Netherlands, pp 115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oikonomou ND (2005) Recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 27:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poon CS, Kou SC, Lam CS (2007) Influence of recycled aggregate on slump and bleeding of fresh concrete. Mater Struct 40(9):981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L (2004) Effect of microstructure of ITZ on compressive strength of concrete prepared with recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 18:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahal K (2007) Mechanical properties of concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. Build Environ 42:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sakai K (2005) Environmental design for concrete structures. J Adv Concr Technol 3(1):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sakai K (2009) Recycling concrete—the present state and future perspective. TCG-JSCE Joint Seminar, Athens. www.library.tee.gr/digital/m2469/m2469_sakai.pdf. Accessed on 23 July 2012
  30. 30.
    Sato R, Maruyama I, Sogabe T, Sogo M (2007) Flexural behaviour of reinforced recycled concrete beams. J Adv Concr Technol 5(1):43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    SIS (1982) SRPS B.B8.036: crushed aggregate—determination of fine particles with the wet sieve analysis. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    SIS (1983) SRPS B.B3.100: crushed aggregates for concrete and asphalt. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    SIS (1984a) SRPS B.B8.049: Mineral aggregate—determination of volumetric coefficient. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    SIS (1984b) SRPS U.M1.057: concrete—grading of aggregate for concrete. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    SIS (1994) SRPS B.B8.033: mineral aggregate—determination of crushability by compression in cylinder. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    SIS (1999) SRPS ISO 6782: aggregates for concrete—determination of bulk density. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    SIS (2000) SRPS ISO 6784: concrete—determination of static modulus of elasticity in compression. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    SIS (2008) SRPS EN 12390–6: testing hardened concrete, part 6—tensile splitting strength of test specimens. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    SIS (2009) SRPS EN 1097–6:2007/A1: tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates, part 6—determination of particle density and water absorption: Corrigendum 1. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    SIS (2009) SRPS EN 1097–3: tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates, part 3—determination of loose bulk density and voids. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    SIS (2010) SRPS EN 12390–3: testing hardened concrete, part 3—compressive strength of test specimens. Serbian Institution for Standardization SIS, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Symonds, Argus, Cowi, PRC Bouwcentrum (1999) Construction and demolition waste management practices and their economic impact. Report of the Project Group to the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/cdw/cdw_chapter1-6.pdf. Accessed on 23 July 2012
  43. 43.
    Tam WYV, Gao XF, Tam CM, Ng KM (2009) Physio-chemical reactions in recycled aggregate concrete. J Hazard Mater 163(2–3):823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tam WYV, Tam CM (2008) Diversifying two-stage mixing approach (TSMA) for recycled aggregate concrete: TSMAs and TSMAsc. Constr Build Mater 22:2067–2077Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tam WYV, Wang K, Tam CM (2008) Assessing relationships among properties of demolished concrete, recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete using regression analysis. J Hazard Mater 152(2):703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Works Bureau (2002) Works Bureau Technical Circular 12/2002, specifications facilitating the use of recycled aggregates, Hong Kong SAR Government http://www.bd.gov.hk/english/documents/pnap/APP/APP129.pdf. Accessed on 23 July 2012
  47. 47.
    Xiao J, Falkner H (2007) Bond behavior between recycled aggregate concrete and steel rebars. Constr Build Mater 21:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xiao J, Sun Y, Falkner H (2006) Seismic performance of frame structures with recycled aggregate concrete. Eng Struct 28:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang KH, Chung HS, Ashour A (2008) Influence of type and replacement level of recycled aggregates on concrete properties. ACI Mater J 105(3):289–296Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan S. Ignjatović
    • 1
  • Snežana B. Marinković
    • 1
  • Zoran M. Mišković
    • 1
  • Aleksandar R. Savić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations