Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced sensitivity performance on NH3 gas sensor through nanoparticles deposition on multi-walled CNTs by MOCVD

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we report the microstructural characterization and performance of a NH3 sensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). In order to improve the sensing performance, MWCNTs were functionalized by chemical treatment and metallic nanoparticles were successfully synthetized on the surface of their walls by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Then, a drop of nanotubes suspension was placed in the interdigitated electrodes and dried at 400 °C for 2 h. Sensors were tested with differents concentrations of ammonia gas (20, 60, and 100 ppm) and temperatures (25, 120, and 200 °C). The morphology of the sensing material was analyzed by transmission electron microscope (TEM). The experimental results reveals that the AgNPs/-f-MWCNTs evaluated at 120 °C has the best sensing response in comparison to the sensors evaluated at 27 °C and 200 °C. Working temperature plays an important role in sensor performance.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the finding of this study are available for the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Agency for Toxic substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR). (NIOSH Publishing Web, 2023) Ammonia Public Health Statement | ATSDR (cdc.gov). 2004. Accessed 01 Jan 2023

  2. C. Wang, L. Yin, L. Zhang, D. Xiang, R. Gao, Sensors (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/s100302088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Chao, Z. Liu, S. Xing, Q. Gao, J. Zhao, Sens. Actuators:B-Chem. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Dariyal, S. Sharma, G. Chauhan, B.P. Singh, S.R. Dhakate, Nanoscale Adv. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1na00707F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.G. Bannov, M.V. Popov, A.E. Brester, P.B. Kurmashow, Micromachines (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Jang, J. Yun, H. Kim, Y. Lee, Improvement in ammonia gas sensing behavior by polypyrrole/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites. Carbon Lett. 13, 88–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2012.13.2.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.K. Young, J. Choi, L.Y. Doo, K.B. Hyun, Y.Y. Yeol, C.H. Hee, J.B. Kwon, Nanoscale Res. Lett. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-27X-8-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Jagannathan, D. Dhinasekaran, R.A. Rakkesh, Sens. Actuators B-Chem. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Claramunt, O. Monereo, M. Boix, R. Leghrib, J.D. Prades, P. Merino, C. Merino, A. Cirera, Sens. Actuators B-Chem. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.12.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Zhang, W. Zhang, J. Sens. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/160698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Dilonardo, M. Penza, M. Alvisi, R. Rossi, G. Cassano, C.D. Franco, F. Palmisano, L. Torsi, N. Cioffi, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.8.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Machín, M. Cotto, J. Duconge, C. Morant, F.I. Petescu, F. Márquez, Chemosensors (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11040247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Abdelhalim, A. Abdellah, G. Scarpa, P. Lugli, Nanotechnology (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/5/055208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Andrews, D. Jacques, A.M. Rao, F. Derbyshire, D. Qian, X. Fan, E.C. Dickey, J. Chen, Chem. Phys. Lett. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00282-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.S. Capula, G.J.R. Vargas, A.J.A. Toledo, C.C. Angeles, J. Aalloy. Compd. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.08.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.S. Farhood, M.N. Khalaf, A.E. Mohammed, A.N. Abd, Mater. Today Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O.J. Seok, A.K. Hyun, H.J. Sook, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 22, 89 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. I.D. Rosca, F. Watari, M. Uo, T. Akasaka, Carbon (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L.K. Randeniya, P.J. Martin, A. Bendavid, J. McDonnell, Carbon (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Qian, C. Zhou, J. Zhou, A. Huang, Appl. Surf. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Kianfar, Importance and Applications of Nanotecnology, ed. By MedDocs Publishers (MedDocs, Nevada, 2020), pp 22

  22. M. Yang, D. Chen, J. Hu, X. Zheng, Z.J. Lin, H. Zhu, Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Kwon, C. Kim, K. Kim, H. Jung, H. Kang, J. Alloy. Compd. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167551

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This paper was performed in collaboration between the authors. SC-C was responsible for the following step in the project experimental work, analyzed characterization results, and prepared the manuscript writing and argumentation of the paper. GT helped analyze the interpretation of the sensor response and was responsible of the revision on the experimental work. ET-S was involved in the TEM characterization and interpretation results. JV was responsible for the formal analysis and investigation. KA participated in the electrical characterization of the sensors and did the proofreading of the paper. DA-H helped supervision and methodology. FC was involved in the synthesis of the carbon nanotubes. OS was involved in the analysis, and cohesion of results and clarity of content deployment of this paper with a critical view on the fabrication and overall performance of the sensor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Terán.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the preparation of this article. All co-authors have seen and agreed with the contents of the manuscript and there are not financial interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capula-Colindres, S., Terán, G., Torres-Santillán, E. et al. Enhanced sensitivity performance on NH3 gas sensor through nanoparticles deposition on multi-walled CNTs by MOCVD. MRS Advances 8, 1134–1138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-023-00694-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-023-00694-z

Navigation