Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How the implications of force majeure resulted in the adoption of more sustainable materials

  • Review Article
  • Published:
MRS Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many thoughtful, valid, and institutionalized barriers for adopting “new” materials in production. Examples include structural engineering analysis of components and subsystems, plant trials, dimensional characterization, mechanical and physical testing, changing engineering prints and manufacturing bills of materials, adding suppliers to computerized procurement systems, and quality audits of suppliers to name just a few. In 2020 and 2021, a wave of force majeure actions in the materials industry wreaked havoc with manufacturing supply chains, and, consequently, some materials were just not available for production. This article will address, from a typical materials’ customer perspective, this “crisis” situation and will provide two case histories of how sustainable materials provided long-term supply chain alternatives to historic materials. These sustainable materials resulted in high-quality parts, diversified the supply chain, and kept manufacturing lines running to the benefit of the employees, shareholders, and communities where these manufacturing facilities reside, and our environment.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Source: Celanese Corporation external data.

Figure 3

Source: Celanese Corporation external data.

Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, Force Majeure (n.d.). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/force_majeure

  2. F. Esposito, “Brother, Can You Spare Some Resin?” Plastics News (August 17, 2021)

  3. K. Alicke, X. Azcue, E. Barriball, Supply-Chain Recovery in Coronavirus Times—Plan for Now and in the Future (McKinsey & Company, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Logility, Five Ways to Conquer Supply Chain Disruption with S&OP Technologies (Logility, 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Lund, J. Manyika, J. Woetzel, E. Barriball, M. Krishnan, K. Alicke, M. Birshan, K. George, S. Smit, D. Swan, K. Hutzler, Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Global Institute, Washington, DC, 2020). https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/risk-resilience-and-rebalancing-in-global-value-chains.

  6. MarineShift360, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Calculator (n.d.). marineshift360.org

  7. Ecoinvent Life Cycle Inventory Database (n.d.). https://ecoinvent.org

  8. US Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Defense Handbook: Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures (MIL-HDBK-5J, DoD, Washington, DC, January 31, 2003), sec. 9, pp. 9-1– 9-261

  9. US Department of Defense (DoD), “Structural Reliability,” chap. 9, in Department of Defense Handbook: Composite Materials Handbook - Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design and Analysis, vol. 3 (MIL-HDBK-17/3F, DoD, Washington, DC, June 17, 2002), pp. 9-1–9-10

  10. T.A. Osswald, E. Baur, S. Brinkmann, K. Oberbach, E. Schmachtenberg, International Plastics Handbook, the Resource for Plastics Engineers (Hanser Publishers, Munich, 2006), p. 473

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. T.A. Osswald, G. Menges, Materials Science of Polymers for Engineers (Hanser Publishers, Munich, 2003), pp. 71–75

    Google Scholar 

  12. US Geological Survey (USGS), Glossary—Basalt (USGS, US Department of the Interior, Reston, April 8, 2015). https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/glossary/basalt.html

  13. F. Pagés Ruiz, A Greener Rebar (Green Building Advisor, June 27, 2022). https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/basalt-rebar

  14. M. Wang, Semi-fabricated Aluminum Products Life Cycle Assessment Report Overview (The Aluminum Association, Arlington, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wang, The Environmental Footprint of Semi-fabricated Aluminum Products in North America—A life Cycle Assessment Report (The Aluminum Association, Arlington, 2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin R. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, K.R., Mallek, J., Gathright, M. et al. How the implications of force majeure resulted in the adoption of more sustainable materials. MRS Bulletin 48, 386–393 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-023-00533-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-023-00533-4

Keywords

Navigation