Skip to main content

Graphene coating on silicon anodes enabled by thermal surface modification for high-energy lithium-ion batteries

Abstract

Silicon is a high-energy density anode material for lithium-ion batteries, but it possesses shortcomings such as poor electronic conductivity, interfacial instability and mechanical fracturing that hinder its battery cycling. Carbon coating has been an important strategy for stabilizing silicon anodes, but the effects of the silicon surface properties on carbon coating morphology and the consequent silicon cycling stability have not been clearly elucidated. Herein, we find that thermal oxidation of the silicon anodes followed by chemical vapor deposition of carbonaceous precursors leads to a well-ordered graphene coating, whereas disordered graphite coating is formed on the native silicon surface. Graphene-coated silicon exhibits superior cycling performance, retaining a discharge capacity of ~1300 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles, whereas the disordered graphite-coated silicon suffers continuous degradation, retaining only ~ 600 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles. Cryogenic electron microscopy reveals the mechanism behind the difference in cycling stabilities; graphene coated silicon is able to withstand the large mechanical strains induced during extended cycling, whereas disordered graphite coating is ruptured, exposing silicon surfaces to the electrolyte, leading to extensive buildup of SEI and poor cycling performance. Characterization of the silicon surface reveals that thermal treatment yields an oxygen-rich surface layer, which is hypothesized to play a decisive role in dictating the carbon coating. This work highlights the effect of silicon surface properties on carbon coating microstructure, and presents thermal treatment as a facile avenue to attain graphene coating on silicon anodes.

Impact statement

Lithium-ion batteries have become an indispensable element of modern society, powering our mobile devices, electric vehicles, and the grid. For longer-ranged vehicles and longer-running devices, higher-energy density batteries are in demand. Silicon is a promising next-generation anode material, as it offers a capacity of 3570 mAh/g, 10 times that of the current state-of-the-art graphite anode material. However, the adoption of Si anodes is hindered by mechanical fracturing due to volume expansion, poor electrical conductivity, and interfacial instability in contact with the electrolyte. Carbon coating on Si particles plays an integral role in improving these features. The quality of carbon has a critical impact on the performance of the coating: Graphene, compared to disordered carbon, has been suggested to provide superior electrical conductivity, interphase stability, and mechanical integrity. This study deploys cryogenic electron microscopy to reveal the mechanism behind the improved electrochemical performance of graphene-coated silicon.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. Y. Liu, G. Zhou, K. Liu, Y. Cui, Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2895 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M.T. McDowell, S.W. Lee, W.D. Nix, Y. Cui, Adv. Mater. 25, 4966 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Huang et al., Matter 1, 1232 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.K. Chan et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 31 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Yao et al., Nano Lett. 11, 2949 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Liu et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 187 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Chen, L. Shen, P.A. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, Adv. Mater. 29, 1605650 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Wang et al., Nano Energy 61, 404 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Wang et al., Nano Lett. 18, 7060 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Li, H. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 48, 1201 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Yu et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 12697 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Nava, J. Schwan, M.G. Boebinger, M.T. Mcdowell, L. Mangolini, Nano Lett. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Li et al., Nat. Energy 1, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. I.H. Son et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Chen, Y. Qi, X. Chen, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, Adv. Mater. 31, 1 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Ko et al., Nat. Energy 1, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Wang et al., Nano Res. 13, 1558 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. W. An et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Lin, X. Xu, C. Chu, M.K. Majeed, J. Yang, Angew. Chem. 128, 14269 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.G. Tan, J.G. Duh, J. Power Sources 335, 146 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G.S. Higashi, Y.J. Chabal, G.W. Trucks, K. Raghavachari, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 656 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. B.R. Weinberger, G.G. Peterson, T.C. Eschrich, H.A. Krasinski, J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3232 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A.C. Ferrari, J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Li et al., Science (-80) 358, 506 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. X. Han et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 44840 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Z. Pang et al., Extrem. Mech. Lett. 35, 100616 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Zhang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(45), 16141 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. I.H. Son et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 1561 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Liu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 197 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Lin et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2371 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Wang et al., Nano Res. 13, 1558 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-2026822. The HR-TEM images were taken with a K3 IS camera and support is courtesy of Gatan Inc. Z.Z. acknowledges the support of Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship. S.T.O. acknowledges support from the Knight Hennessy scholarship for graduate studies at Stanford University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.C.K. and Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments. S.C.K. conducted coating fabrication, materials characterization, and electrochemical performance testing. W.H. conducted room temperature TEM experiments. Z.Z. conducted cryo-EM experiments. J.W. prepared porous microsilicon particles. S.C.K. and Y.C. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 934 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.C., Huang, W., Zhang, Z. et al. Graphene coating on silicon anodes enabled by thermal surface modification for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. MRS Bulletin 47, 127–133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-021-00191-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-021-00191-4