Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical Mechanical Surface Nano-Structuring (CMNS) Implementation on Titanium Based Implants to Enhance Corrosion Resistance and Control Biocompatibility

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium is the metal of choice for many implantable devices including dental prostheses, orthopaedic devices and cardiac pacemakers. Titanium and its alloys are favoured for hard tissue replacement because of their high strength to density ratio providing excellent mechanical properties and biocompatible surface characteristics promoting in-vivo passivation due to spontaneous formation of a native protective oxide layer in the presence of an oxidizer. This study focuses on the development of a three-dimensional chemical, mechanical, surface nano-structuring (CMNS) process to induce smoothness or controlled nano-roughness on the bio-implant surfaces, particularly for applications in dental implants. CMNS is an extension of the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. CMP is utilized in microelectronics manufacturing for planarizing the wafer surfaces to enable photolithography and multilayer metallization. In biomaterials applications, the same approach can be utilized to induce controlled surface nanostructure on three-dimensional implantable objects to promote or demote cell attachment. As a synergistic method of nano-structuring on the implant surfaces, CMNS also makes the titanium surface more adaptable for the bio-compatible coatings as well as the cell and tissue growth as demonstrated by the electrochemical and surface wettability evaluations on implants prepared by DI-water machining versus oil based machining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Staruch, M. Griffin, and P. Butler, “Nanoscale Surface Modifications of Orthopaedic Implants: State of the Art and Perspectives,” Open Orthop. J., 2017, doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010920.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Ozdemir, A. Ozdemir, and G. B. Basim, “Application of chemical mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Ozdemir and G. B. Basim, “Effect of chemical mechanical polishing on surface nature of titanium implants FT-IR and wettability data of titanium implants surface after chemical mechanical polishing implementation,” Data Br., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.065.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. I. Rabinovich, J. J. Adler, A. Ata, R. K. Singh, and B. M. Moudgil, “Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7168.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. L. Stafford, L. Chambrone, J. A. Shibli, C. E. Mercúrio, B. Cardoso, and P. M. Preshaw, “Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants,” Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2014, doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401047.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Lüers, C. Seitz, M. Laub, and H. P. Jennissen, “Contact angle measurement on dental implants,” Biomed. Tech., vol. 59, no. January 2014, pp. S91–S94, 2014, doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-4042.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. L. Cochran, R. K. Schenk, A. Lussi, F. L. Higginbottom, and D. Buser, “Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Delgado-Ruiz and G. Romanos, “Potential causes of titanium particle and ion release in implant dentistry: A systematic review,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijms19113585.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Rhenus FS 750,” Rhenus Lub GmbH Co KG, Mönchengladbach, Ger., vol. 2006, no. 1907, pp. 1-13, 2015.

  10. Basim, G.B., Bebek, O., “The Method of Processing Multidimensional Objects Using Chemical And Mechanical Polishing Method and Configuration of Robotic Arm Employed in Realizing This Method” PCT Patent Office Application No: PCT/TR2014/000530, Application Date 31.12.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basim, G.B., Ozdemir, Z., “Chemical mechanical polishing implementation on dental implants,” IEEE Xplore, 2015 International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology (ICPT), Chandler, AZ, 2015, pp. 1–4.

  12. T. Kokubo and H. Takadama, “How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?,” Biomaterials, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zareidoost, Amiret al. “The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium” Journal of Material Science. Materials in Medicine. vol. 23, 6 2012, pp. 1479–88. doi:10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sowa and W. Simka, “Electrochemical impedance and polarization corrosion studies of tantalum surface modified by DC Plasma electrolytic oxidation,” Materials (Basel)., 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11040545.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. C. Rodrigueset al, “Titanium corrosion mechanisms in the oral environment: A retrieval study,” Materials (Basel)., 2013, doi: 10.3390/ma6115258.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Al Otaibi, E. S. M. Sherif, M. Q. Al-Rifaiy, S. Zinelis, and Y. S. Al Jabbari, “Corrosion resistance of coupled sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and anodized Ti implant surfaces in synthetic saliva,” Clin. Exp. Dent. Res., 2019, doi: 10.1002/cre2.198.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. A. Siddiqui, L. Guida, S. Sridhar, P. Valderrama, T. G. Wilson, and D. C. Rodrigues, “Evaluation of oral microbial corrosion on the surface degradation of dental implant materials,” J. Periodontol., 2019, doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Hayashiet al, “Hydrocarbon deposition attenuates osteoblast activity on titanium,” J. Dent. Res., 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022034514536578.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beers, K., Sur, D. & Basim, G.B. Chemical Mechanical Surface Nano-Structuring (CMNS) Implementation on Titanium Based Implants to Enhance Corrosion Resistance and Control Biocompatibility. MRS Advances 5, 2209–2219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.325

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.325

Navigation