Abstract
Titanium is the metal of choice for many implantable devices including dental prostheses, orthopaedic devices and cardiac pacemakers. Titanium and its alloys are favoured for hard tissue replacement because of their high strength to density ratio providing excellent mechanical properties and biocompatible surface characteristics promoting in-vivo passivation due to spontaneous formation of a native protective oxide layer in the presence of an oxidizer. This study focuses on the development of a three-dimensional chemical, mechanical, surface nano-structuring (CMNS) process to induce smoothness or controlled nano-roughness on the bio-implant surfaces, particularly for applications in dental implants. CMNS is an extension of the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. CMP is utilized in microelectronics manufacturing for planarizing the wafer surfaces to enable photolithography and multilayer metallization. In biomaterials applications, the same approach can be utilized to induce controlled surface nanostructure on three-dimensional implantable objects to promote or demote cell attachment. As a synergistic method of nano-structuring on the implant surfaces, CMNS also makes the titanium surface more adaptable for the bio-compatible coatings as well as the cell and tissue growth as demonstrated by the electrochemical and surface wettability evaluations on implants prepared by DI-water machining versus oil based machining.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Staruch, M. Griffin, and P. Butler, “Nanoscale Surface Modifications of Orthopaedic Implants: State of the Art and Perspectives,” Open Orthop. J., 2017, doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010920.
Z. Ozdemir, A. Ozdemir, and G. B. Basim, “Application of chemical mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.002.
Z. Ozdemir and G. B. Basim, “Effect of chemical mechanical polishing on surface nature of titanium implants FT-IR and wettability data of titanium implants surface after chemical mechanical polishing implementation,” Data Br., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.065.
Y. I. Rabinovich, J. J. Adler, A. Ata, R. K. Singh, and B. M. Moudgil, “Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7168.
G. L. Stafford, L. Chambrone, J. A. Shibli, C. E. Mercúrio, B. Cardoso, and P. M. Preshaw, “Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants,” Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2014, doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401047.
S. Lüers, C. Seitz, M. Laub, and H. P. Jennissen, “Contact angle measurement on dental implants,” Biomed. Tech., vol. 59, no. January 2014, pp. S91–S94, 2014, doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-4042.
D. L. Cochran, R. K. Schenk, A. Lussi, F. L. Higginbottom, and D. Buser, “Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q.
R. Delgado-Ruiz and G. Romanos, “Potential causes of titanium particle and ion release in implant dentistry: A systematic review,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijms19113585.
“Rhenus FS 750,” Rhenus Lub GmbH Co KG, Mönchengladbach, Ger., vol. 2006, no. 1907, pp. 1-13, 2015.
Basim, G.B., Bebek, O., “The Method of Processing Multidimensional Objects Using Chemical And Mechanical Polishing Method and Configuration of Robotic Arm Employed in Realizing This Method” PCT Patent Office Application No: PCT/TR2014/000530, Application Date 31.12.2014.
Basim, G.B., Ozdemir, Z., “Chemical mechanical polishing implementation on dental implants,” IEEE Xplore, 2015 International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology (ICPT), Chandler, AZ, 2015, pp. 1–4.
T. Kokubo and H. Takadama, “How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?,” Biomaterials, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017.
Zareidoost, Amiret al. “The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium” Journal of Material Science. Materials in Medicine. vol. 23, 6 2012, pp. 1479–88. doi:10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9
M. Sowa and W. Simka, “Electrochemical impedance and polarization corrosion studies of tantalum surface modified by DC Plasma electrolytic oxidation,” Materials (Basel)., 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11040545.
D. C. Rodrigueset al, “Titanium corrosion mechanisms in the oral environment: A retrieval study,” Materials (Basel)., 2013, doi: 10.3390/ma6115258.
A. Al Otaibi, E. S. M. Sherif, M. Q. Al-Rifaiy, S. Zinelis, and Y. S. Al Jabbari, “Corrosion resistance of coupled sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and anodized Ti implant surfaces in synthetic saliva,” Clin. Exp. Dent. Res., 2019, doi: 10.1002/cre2.198.
D. A. Siddiqui, L. Guida, S. Sridhar, P. Valderrama, T. G. Wilson, and D. C. Rodrigues, “Evaluation of oral microbial corrosion on the surface degradation of dental implant materials,” J. Periodontol., 2019, doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0110.
R. Hayashiet al, “Hydrocarbon deposition attenuates osteoblast activity on titanium,” J. Dent. Res., 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022034514536578.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beers, K., Sur, D. & Basim, G.B. Chemical Mechanical Surface Nano-Structuring (CMNS) Implementation on Titanium Based Implants to Enhance Corrosion Resistance and Control Biocompatibility. MRS Advances 5, 2209–2219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.325
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.325