Skip to main content
Log in

Physico-chemical Effects of Gelatin Addition in Carboxymethylcellulose and Calcium Phosphate Cement-based Nanocomposites

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanocomposites comprising of biopolymers and calcium phosphate cements (CaP) are promising due to their biocompatibility, non-toxicity, biodegradability and suitable mechanical properties for biomedical applications. In here, a new composite material was synthesized with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and gelatin (GEL) as the liquid phase and CaP based powder as the solid phase. In this study, the effect of addition of different wt% of GEL including 0, 5, 10, 20 in the liquid phase was investigated on the physical properties of the nanocomposites. Physico-chemical characteristics of materials were determined by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical tests. Swelling analysis was performed after 1, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours and degradation of samples was studied after 7 and 14 days. FTIR results showed that there was physical interaction between CMC and GEL with H bonding which was evident from the peak at 3288cm−1. Disruption in GEL structure was observed from the band at 1600–1400 cm−1 Disruption of GEL structure may increase the interaction between CMC and GEL molecules. After mixing of solid and liquid phases, negative charged COO groups on CMC and Ca2+ molecules from CaP start to interact with each other. This produces attraction sites for PO43− molecules. This lead to accumulation of hydroxyapatite-like structures. A homogenous and porous microstructure was observed by using SEM in all samples. Mechanical tests showed that GEL improved the strength of the samples up to 20 wt% of GEL. The addition of 20 wt% of GEL decreased the mechanical properties. The compressive strength values were found up to approximately 6 MPa. Swelling results revealed that increasing in GEL concentration cause decrease in swelling until the 16th hour, after that 10wt% GEL samples had the lowest swelling which was approximately 28%. Finally, degradation studies indicated that the highest degradation rate was for 10% GEL incorporated samples. Addition of further GEL also reduced the degradation rate. Overall, the addition of GEL improved physical properties of the samples for potential biomedical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Zilberman Meital, editor. Stud. Mechanobiology Tissue Eng. Biomater. 8. Springer US; 2011.

  2. Dorozhkin S. J. Funct Biomater. 2013; 4:209–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Habraken WJEM, De Jonge LT, Wolke JGC, Yubao L, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. J Biomed. Mater. Res. — Part A. 2008; 87:643–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Perez RA, Kim HW, Ginebra MP. J. Tissue Eng. 2012; 3:1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Zhang, W. Liu, V. Schnitzler, F. Tancret, and J. M. Bouler, Acta Biomater., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1035–1049, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. A. Nawawi, A. S.F. Alqap, and I. Sopyan, Recent Patents Mater. Sci. 2011; 4, 1:63–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manjubala I, Basu P, Narendrakumar U. Colloid and Polymer Science; 2018; 17:29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Engstrand, C. Persson, and H. Engqvist, Biomatter, 2013; 3, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaihre B, Jayasuriya AC. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Elsevier B.V.; 2016; 69:733–743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Demitri C, Sole R Del, Scalera F, Sannino A, Vasapollo G, Maffezzoli A, et al. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008; 110:2453–2460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bigi A, Bracci B, Panzavolta S. Biomaterials. 2004; 25:2893–2899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez-Heredia MA, Sariibrahimoglu K, Yang W, Bohner M, Yamashita D, Kunstar A, et al. Acta Biomater. Acta Materialia Inc.; 2012; 8:404–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Hashem, S. Sharaf, M. M. Abd El-Hady, and A. Hebeish, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013; 95, 1:421–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kozlowska, N. Stachowiak, and A. Sionkowska, Polymers (Basel). 2018; 10, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duhoranimana E, Karangwa E, Lai L, Xu X, Yu J, Xia S, et al. Food Hydrocoll. Elsevier Ltd; 2017; 69:111–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buhus G, Peptu C, Popa M, Desbrières J. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2009; 43:141–151.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Medvecky, M. Giretova, and T. Sopcak, Mater. Lett., 2013; 100:137–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarker A, Linh NTB, Jung H Il, Seo HS, Lee BT. Macromol. Res. 2014; 22:1297–1305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohamed KR, Beherei HH, El-Rashidy ZM. J. Adv. Res. Cairo University; 2014; 5:201–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Eliaz and N. Metoki, Materials (Basel)., 2017; 10, 334:1–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. L. Davison, F. Barrère-de Groot, and D. W. Grijpma, Elsevier Inc., 2014; 177–215.

  22. Z. Peng, Z. Li, F. Zhang, and X. Peng, J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem., 2014; 51, 8: 646–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Zhang, Y. Yao, A. Wei, L. Shen, and S. Chen, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018; 439, 4: 0–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jiankang et al., Acta Biomater., 2009; 5, 1: 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Bose, M. Roy, A. Bandyopadhyay. Trends Biotechnol. 2012; 30(10): 546–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güben, E., Ege, D. Physico-chemical Effects of Gelatin Addition in Carboxymethylcellulose and Calcium Phosphate Cement-based Nanocomposites. MRS Advances 4, 2453–2459 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.239

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.239

Navigation