Abstract
We present a study of the energy levels in a FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/Spiro solar cell device. The measurements are performed using a novel ambient pressure photoemission (APS) technique alongside Contact Potential Difference data from a Kelvin Probe. The Perovskite Solar Cell energy band diagram is demonstrated for the device in dark conditions and under illumination from a 150W Quartz Tungsten Halogen lamp. This approach provides useful information on the interaction between the different materials in this solar cell device. Additionally, non-destructive macroscopic DC and AC Surface Photovoltage Spectroscopy (SPS) studies are demonstrated of different MAPBI3 device structures to give an indication of overall device performance. AC-SPS measurements, previously used on traditional semiconductors to study the mobility, are used in this case to characterise the ability of a perovskite solar cell device to respond rapidly to chopped light. Two different device structures studied showed very different characteristics: Sample A (without TiO2): (ITO/PEDOT:PSS/polyTPD/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM) had ∼4 times the magnitude of AC-SPS response compared to Sample B (including TiO2): (ITO/TiO2/ CH3NH3PbI3/Spiro). This demonstrates that the carrier speed characteristics of device architecture A is superior to device architecture B. The TiO2 layer has been associated with carrier trapping which is illustrated in this example. However, the DC-SPV performance of sample B is ∼5 times greater than that of sample A. The band gap of the MAPBI3 layer was determined through DC-SPS (1.57 ± 0.07 eV), Voc of the devices measured and qualitative observations made of interface trapping by DC light pulsing. The combination of these (APS, KP, AC/DC-SPV/SPS) techniques offers a more general method for measuring the energy level alignments and performance of Organic and Hybrid Solar Cell Devices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Wang, M. Wright, N. K. Elumalai and A. Uddin, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 147, 255– 275 (2016).
A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai and T. Miyasaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (17), 6050–6051 (2009).
N. G. Park, Mater. Today 18 (2), 65–72 (2015).
H. J. Snaith and M. Gratzel, Adv. Mater. 19 (21), 3643–3647 (2007).
A. K. Chandiran, M. Abdi-Jalebi, M. K. Nazeeruddin and M. Gratzel, ACS Nano 8 (3), 2261– 2268 (2014).
O. Malinkiewicz, A. Yella, Y. H. Lee, G. M. Espallargas, M. Graetzel, M. K. Nazeeruddin and H. J. Bolink, Nat. Photonics 8 (2), 128–132 (2014).
L. Kronik and Y. Shapira, Surf. Sci. Rep. 37 (1–5), 1–206 (1999).
L. Barnea-Nehoshtan, S. Kirmayer, E. Edri, G. Hodes and D. Cahen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (14), 2408–2413 (2014).
Y. J. Lee, J. Wang and J. W. P. Hsu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (17), 5 (2013).
J. R. Harwell, T. K. Baikie, I. D. Baikie, J. L. Payne, C. Ni, J. T. S. Irvine, G. A. Turnbull and I. D. W. Samuel, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (29), 19738–19745 (2016).
I. D. Baikie, A. C. Grain, J. Sutherland and J. Law, Appl. Surf. Sci. 323, 45–53 (2014).
X. H. Kong, J. E. Rowe and R. J. Nemanich, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 (4), 1461–1465 (2008).
S. A. Kulkarni, T. Baikie, P. P. Boix, N. Yantara, N. Mathews and S. Mhaisalkar, J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (24), 9221–9225 (2014).
D. K. Schroder, Measurement Science and Technology 12 (3), R16 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Challinger, S.E., Baikie, I.D., Harwell, J.R. et al. An Investigation of the Energy Levels within a Common Perovskite Solar Cell Device and a Comparison of DC/AC Surface Photovoltage Spectroscopy Kelvin Probe Measurements of Different MAPBI3 Perovskite Solar Cell Device Structures. MRS Advances 2, 1195–1201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.72
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.72