Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Titration Methods Used in Characterization of Bentonite

  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titration of bentonite, or clay materials in general, can be carried out in two ways, namely by semi-continuous method and batch method. This study compares these two methods, and, in addition, presents the results of two different evaluation and regression procedures used for fitting of experimental titration curves and for calculation of corresponding parameters. Bentonites B75 and S65, and montmorillonite SAz-1, were chosen for this study. Regarding the semi-continuous method, the technique developed by Wanner et al. was used. As for the batch method, two-week contact time for selected solid/liquid ratio 1 g per 250 ml was used on the base of preliminary experiments. The evaluation of result obtained using the batch method with back titration correction gave more relevant data, on the other hand, with the use of this method is connected a risk of solid phase dissolution. The chemical equilibrium model (i.e. non-electrostatic), incorporated into codes (I) PHREEQC + UCODE_2005, and (II) PDNLRG.fm (code package STAMB) + software FAMULUS, was used to the evaluation of the titration curves. The codes mentioned give only slightly different resulting values in the case of batch method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Wanner, Y. Albisson, O. Karnland, E. Wieland, P. Wersin and L. Charlet, Radiochimica Acta 66/67, 157 (1994).

  2. B. Baeyens, M.H. Bradbury, J. Cont. Hydrol. 27, 199 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Tournassat, J.M. Greneche, D. Tisserand and L. Charlet, J. Colloid and Interface Science 273, 224 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Filipská and K. Štamberg, Acta Polytechnica 45, 11 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.L. Herbelin and J.C. Westall, FITEQL – A computer program for determination of chemical equilibrium constants from experimental data, version 3.2, Report 96–01, Corvallis, Oregon, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Brendler, RES3T – Rossendorf Expert System for Surface and Sorption Thermodynamics, 2nd Release from January 24, 2006. Forschungszentrum Rossendorf e.V., Institute for Radiochemistry, Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lützenkirchen (Ed.), Surface Complexation Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 133-170.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Cervinka and D. Hanuláková, Research Report No. 14269/2013 (in Czech), ÚJV Rež, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adam, R., Štamberg, K. & Drtinová, B. Comparison of Titration Methods Used in Characterization of Bentonite. MRS Advances 1, 4035–4040 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.186

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.186

Navigation