Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploration of Polytetrafluoroethylene as a Potential Material Replacement for Hemodialysis Applications

  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dialysis is the process by which an artificial kidney device removes waste and excess water from a patient. An outstanding problem with dialysis is that the body has a remarkable immune function where proteins and antigens mark foreign objects as possible threats despite the biocompatibility of the material. Upon adhesion to polymeric materials used currently in dialysis, proteins are lost. In this study, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is investigated as a potential replacement material for dialysis tubing because of its unreactive nature. The focus is to determine if PTFE will prove a viable material in minimizing protein adhesion and further reducing antibody loss of the patient. Protein loss as a function of filtration time was measured. PVC and PTFE materials were investigated following the same battery of testing where the protein concentrations in the blood were characterized using UV Visible spectrophotometry. Results demonstrate a loss of nearly 12 percent of blood proteins to the PVC material over the course of a typical dialysis treatment. Conversely, the protein loss due to adhesion to PTFE was less than two percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergström J. Nutrition and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6(5): 1329–1341.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Theofilou P. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment. Journal of clinical medicine research. 2011;3(3): 132.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Son YJ, Choi KS, Park YR, Bae JS, Lee JB. Depression, symptoms and the quality of life in patients on hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(1): 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pifer TB, Mccullough KP, Port FK, et al. Mortality risk in hemodialysis patients and changes in nutritional indicators: DOPPS. Kidney international. 2002;62(6): 2238–2245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Locatelli F, Fouque D, Heimburger O, et al. Nutritional status in dialysis patients: a European consensus. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(4): 563–572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kopple JD. Effect of nutrition on morbidity and mortality in maintenance dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24(6): 1002–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer KB, Espindle DM, DeGiacomo JM, Jenuleson CS, Kurtin PS, Davies AR. Monitoring dialysis patients’ health status. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24(2): 267–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kao WJ. Evaluation of protein-modulated macrophage behavior on biomaterials: designing biomimetic materials for cellular engineering. Biomaterials. 1999;20(23–24): 2213–2221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Black J. An overview of the biological performance of materials for orthopaedic implants [proceedings]. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1977;38(2): 65–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Black J. Biological performance of materials : fundamentals of biocompatibility. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Taylor & Francis; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrade J, Hlady V. Protein adsorption and materials biocompatibility: a tutorial review and suggested hypotheses. Biopolymers/Non-Exclusion HPLC: Springer; 1986:1–63.

  12. Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C. Vascular wall shear stress: basic principles and methods. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2005;46(1): 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Acton QA. Nitriles-- Advances in Research and Application: 20132013.

  14. Iyasere OU, Brown EA, Johansson L, et al. Quality of Life and Physical Function in Older Patients on Dialysis: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis with Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015.

  15. Simonian MH, Smith JA. Spectrophotometric and colorimetric determination of protein concentration. Current protocols in molecular biology. 2006.

  16. Aitken A, Learmonth M. Protein determination by UV absorption. The protein protocols handbook: Springer; 1996:3–6.

  17. Bates JS, Whitson LR, Albertson KM, et al. Molecular Imprinted Hydrogels in Drug Delivery Applications. MRS Proceedings. Vol 1797: Cambridge Univ Press; 2015:mrss15-2132190.

  18. Bates J. pH-RESPONSIVE HYDROGEL-BASED CHEMOMECHANICAL, The University of Utah; 2013.

  19. Chi EY, Krishnan S, Randolph TW, Carpenter JF. Physical stability of proteins in aqueous solution: mechanism and driving forces in nonnative protein aggregation. Pharm Res. 2003;20(9): 1325– 1336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun TT, Green H. Immunofluorescent staining of keratin fibers in cultured cells. Cell. 1978;14(3): 469–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Faouzi MA, Dine T, Gressier B, et al. Exposure of hemodialysis patients to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate. Int J Pharm. 1999;180(1): 113–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nichols, P.E., Bates, J.S. & Sparks, T.D. Exploration of Polytetrafluoroethylene as a Potential Material Replacement for Hemodialysis Applications. MRS Advances 1, 2147–2153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2016.473

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2016.473

Navigation