Abstract
We present simulations of field emission from carbon nanotubes, using a transfer-matrix methodology. By repeating periodically a basic unit of the nanotubes in the region preceding that containing the extraction field, specific band-structure effects are included in the distribution of incident states, i.e. those entering the field region. The structures considered are the metallic (5,5) and the semiconducting (10,0) single-wall carbon nanotubes. The total-energy distributions of incident states show the gap of the (10,0) and the expected flat region for the (5,5) nanotube. The field-emitted electron energy distributions contain peaks, which are sharper for the (10,0) structure. Except for peaks associated with van Hove singularities in the distribution of incident states or with the Fermi level in the case of a metallic structure, all peaks are shifted to lower energies by the electric field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W.A. de Heer, A. Chatelain and D. Ugarte, Science 270, 1179 (1995).
J.M. Bonard, J.P. Salvetat, T. Stockli, L. Forro and A. Chatelain, Appl. Phys. A 69, 245 (1999) and references therein.
M.J. Fransen, Th.L. van Rooy and P. Kruit, Appl. Surf. Sci. 146, 312 (1999) and references therein.
P.G. Collins and A. Zettl, Phys. Rev. B 55(15), 9391–9 (1997).
Ch. Adessi and M. Devel, Phys. Rev. B 62 (20), 13314–7 (2000).
T. Tamura and M. Tsukada, Phys. Rev. B 52 (8), 6015–26 (1995).
D.L. Carroll, P. Redlich, P.M. Ajayan, J.C. Charlier, X. Blase, A. De Vita and R. Car, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (14), 2811–4 (1997).
A. De Vita, J.Ch. Charlier, X. Blase and R. Car, Appl. Phys. A 68, 283 (1999).
Ph. Kim, T. Odom, J.L. Huang and C.M. Lieber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (6), 1225–8 (1999).
S. Han and J. Ihm, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9886 (2000).
A. Mayer, P. Senet and J-P. Vigneron, J. Phys. Condens. Mat. 11 (44), 8617–31 (1999).
A. Mayer and J.-P. Vigneron, Phys. Rev. B 56 (19), 12599–607 (1997).
A. Mayer and J.-P. Vigneron, J. Phys. Condens. Mat. 10 (4), 869–81 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 60 (4), 2875-82 (1999); Phys. Rev. E 59 (4), 4659-66 (1999); Phys. Rev. E 61 (5), 5953-60 (2000).
G.B. Bachelet, H.S. Greenside, G.A. Baraff and M. Schluter, Phys. Rev. B 24 (8), 4745–52 (1981).
P.A. Gravil, Ph. Lambin, G. Gensterblum, L. Henrard, P. Senet, A.A. Lucas, Surf. Sci 329, 199 (1995).
R. Moussaddar, A. Charlier, E. McRae, R. Heyd and M.F. Charlier, Synthetic Metals 89, 81–86 (1997).
A. Maiti, C.J. Brabec, C. Roland and J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. B 52 (20), 14850–8 (1995).
L. Lou and P. Nordlander, Phys. Rev. B 52 (3), 1429–32 (1995).
R.H. Fowler and L. Nordheim, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 119, 173 (1928)
J.M. Ziman, Principles of the theory of solids (The University Press, Cambridge, 1964) p.46.
K.A. Dean, O. Groening, O.M. Kuttel and L. Schlapbach, App. Phys. Lett. 75 (18), 2773–5 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mayer, A., Miskovsky, N.M. & Cutler, P.H. Three-dimensional calculation of field emission from carbon nanotubes using a transfermatrix methodology. MRS Online Proceedings Library 675, 6101 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-675-W6.10.1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-675-W6.10.1