Skip to main content
Log in

On the Determination of Loop Nature in the Tem

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

We have carried out systematic experiments to explore the range of applicability of the two direct methods which are available for the determination of the nature of small clusters. Experiments in heavy-ion irradiated silver and copper, including direct comparisons with the results of Black-White contrast analysis (B-W), forced us to the conclusion that use of the 21/2D technique for the analysis of faulted loops is effectively impossible because of reciprocal-lattice spike and other effects. We used B-W analysis to investigate the nature of the clusters produced by room-temperature heavy-ion irradiation of copper. In-situ irradiations were performed in the Argonne HVEM-Tandem Facility using 40keV and 80keV Kr+ ions. Nearly all of the analysable first-layer loops were found to bevacancy in nature. Some deeper clusters were also certainlyvacancy. There isno unequivocal evidence forinterstitial loops under these conditions. The near impossibility of establishing that interstitial loops arenot present is shown by the fact that a large fraction of loops - over 50% - could not be analysed either because they did not display clear B-W contrast under any condition or sufficiently consistent B-W contrast under several different operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Fukushima, Y. Shimomura and M.W. Guinan, J. Nucl. Mat., 155-157, p. 1205 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Fukushima, Y. Shimomura, M.W. Guinan and M. Kiritani, Phil.Mag. A60, p. 415 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Fukushima, Y. Shimomura, M. Kiritani, M. W. Guinan, H. Gerstenberg, I. Mukouda and T. Mitoma, J. Nucl. Mat. 212-215, p. 154 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. D. de la Rubia and M. W. Guinan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, p. 2766 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. E. Foreman, W. J. Phythian, and C. A. English, Phil. Mag. A66, p. 671 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. B. Mitchell and W. L. Bell, Acta.Met 24, p. 147 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. U. Essman and M. Wilkens, phys. stat. sol. 4, p. K53 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Riihle, M. Wilkens and U. Essman, phys. stat. sol. 11, p. 819 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Riuhle and M. Wilkens, Phil. Mag. 15, p. 1075 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Fukushima, M. L. Jenkins and M.A. Kirk, Phil. Mag. A, in press (1997a).

  11. H. Fukushima, M. L. Jenkins and M.A. Kirk, Phil. Mag. A, in press (1997b).

  12. D. I. Piskunov, Soy. Phys. Sol. State, 27, p 2125 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M L Jenkins, J. Nucl.Mat. 21, p. 124 (1994) quoting University of Stuttgart doctoral theses by W. Grüschel (1979) and A. Laupheimer (1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenkins, M.L., Fukushima, H. & Kirk, M.A. On the Determination of Loop Nature in the Tem. MRS Online Proceedings Library 439, 289–300 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-439-289

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-439-289

Navigation