Skip to main content
Log in

Interface Mobility Under Different Driving Forces

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used an Ising model to determine whether boundary mobility is an intrinsic material parameter or if it depends on the nature of the driving force for boundary migration. The simulations included both capillarity and external field-driven boundary migration. The external field-driven, flat boundary simulations showed that boundary mobility depends strongly on boundary inclination at low temperature but not at high temperature. On the other hand, the boundary mobility in capillarity-driven migration shows no dependence on boundary inclination and is independent of the boundary migration geometry. An initially circular grain shrinks as a circle and a half-loop boundary retracts with profiles predicted under the assumption that the boundary mobility is isotropic during capillarity-driven migration even when the temperature is very low and the external-field-driven boundary migration is extremely anisotropic. However, when an external field is superimposed on the capillarity driven migration of the circular boundary, the circular grain exhibits well-defined corners consistent with the simulation lattice symmetry. In this case, the boundary mobility is much different than if the external field were omitted. This is a clear demonstration that the boundary mobility can depend on the nature of the driving force for boundary migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Winning, G. Gottstein, and L.S. Shvindlerman (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Molodov, G. Gottstein, F. Heringhaus, and L.S. Shvindlerman, Mater. Sci. Forum 294, 127 (1999).

  • E.M. Fridman, T.W. Kopezkii, and L.S. Shvindlerman, Z. Metallk. 66, 533 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hillert, Scripta Metall. 17, 237 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Upmanyu, R.W. Smith, and D.J. Srolovitz, Interface Sci. 6, 41 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.I. Mendelev and D.J. Srolovitz, Acta Mater. 48, 3711 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Rikvold and M. Kolesik, J. Stat. Phys. 100, 377 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • E.M. Fridman, T.W. Kopezkii, L.S. Shvindlerman, and V.J. Aristov, Z. Metallk. 64, 458 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.B. Straumal, V.G. Sursayeva, and L.S. Shvindlerman, Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 49, 1020 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B.B. Rath and H. Hu, Trans. TMS-AIME 236, 1193 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Jhan and P.D. Bristowe, in Atomic Scale Calculations of Structure in Materials, edited by M.S. Dan and M.A. Schlüter (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 193, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Upmanyu, D.J. Srolovitz, J.A. Warren, A. Lobkovsky, and W.C. Carter (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Ma, Statistical Mechanics, (World Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, 1985).

  • W.K. Burton, N. Cabrera, and F.C. Frank, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (London) Ser. A 243, 299 (1951).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Cahn (private communication).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.R. Van Houten, Ceram. Bull. 38, 301 (1959).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Srolovitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendelev, M.I., Srolovitz, D.J., Shvindlerman, L.S. et al. Interface Mobility Under Different Driving Forces. Journal of Materials Research 17, 234–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.0033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.0033

Navigation