Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made toward the integration of the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States. The back-end integration seeks to address several management challenges: 1) current storage practices are not optimized for transport and disposal; 2) the impact of interim storage on the disposal strategy needs to be evaluated; and 3) the back-end is affected by—and affects—nuclear fuel cycle and energy policy choices. The back-end integration accounts for the various processes of nuclear waste management—onsite storage, consolidated storage, transport and geological disposal. Ideally, these processes should be fully coupled so that benefits and impacts can be assessed at the level of the full fuel cycle. The paper summarizes the causes and consequences of the absence of integration at the backend of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S., critically reviews ongoing integration efforts, and suggests a framework that would support the back-end integration.

References

  1. 1.

    U.S. NWTRB, Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy (United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, VA, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    J. Carter, Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, USA, 2018).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    R.P. Rechard, L.L. Price, and E.A. Kalinina, Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2015), p. 45.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (2019).

  5. 5.

    E.J. Bonano, E.A. Kalinina, and P.N. Swift, MRS Advances 3, 991 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    J. Bruno, L. Duro, and F. Diaz-Maurin, in Advances in Nuclear Fuel Chemistry 1st Edition edited by M. Piro (Woodhead Publishing, 2020), p. 450.

  7. 7.

    R.C. Ewing and W.J. Weber, in Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability edited by D.S. Ginley and D. Cahen (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 178–193.

  8. 8.

    F. Diaz-Maurin, H.C. Sun, J. Yu, and R.C. Ewing, MRS Advances 4, 959 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    F. Diaz-Maurin and R.C. Ewing, Sustainability 10, 4390 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Reset Steering Committee, Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management Strategy and Policy (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    C.A. Johnson, Radioactive Waste Management: A Bibliography for the Integrated Data Base Program (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA), 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    U.S. Department of Energy, Integrated Data Base Report-1996: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics (Washington, D.C., 1997), p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    U.S. Department of Energy, Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    W.J. Danker and J.R. Williams, in High Level Radioactive Waste Management (American Nuclear Society, Las Vegas, NV (USA), 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    J. Jarrell, in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    R. Joseph, B. Craig, R.M. Cumberland, C. Trail, J. St. Aubin, C. Olson, L. Vander Wal, E. Vanderzee, J. Jarrell, and E. Kalinina, in (Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    M. Abkowitz and E. Bickford, in (American Nuclear Society, Charleston, SC, USA, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project, Small Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) Canister System For Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2015), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    R. Howard, in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    U.S. Department of Energy, Designing a Consent-Based Siting Process: Summary of Public Input (Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    J. Dewoghélaëre, G. Hériard-Dubreuil, and Y. Marignac, Civil Society Views on the Content and Governance of a Joint Research Programme (JOPRAD - Towards a Joint Programming on Radioactive Waste Disposal. (EU project H2020-Euratom-653951), Paris, France, 2017), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    A. Brunnengräber and M.R. Di Nucci, editors, Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    B.D. Solomon, M. Andrén, and U. Strandberg, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1, 13 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    A. Kliskey, L. Alessa, S. Wandersee, P. Williams, J. Trammell, J. Powell, J. Grunblatt, and M. Wipfli, Sustain Sci 12, 293 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    K. Mayumi and M. Giampietro, Ecological Indicators 47, 50 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    M. Giampietro, R.J. Aspinall, J. Ramos-Martin, and S.G.F. Bukkens, editors, Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use (Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    F. Diaz-Maurin and M. Giampietro, Energy 49, 162 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    T.R. La Porte and D.S. Metlay, Public Administration Review 56, 341 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    S.E. Robinson, J.W. Stoutenborough, and A. Vedlitz, Understanding Trust in Government: Environmental Sustainability, Fracking, and Public Opinion in American Politics (Routledge, New York, NY, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    M. Greenberg, Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions, and Trust (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    P. Slovic, J.H. Flynn, and M. Layman, Science 254, 1603 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    F. Diaz-Maurin, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74, 335 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    T.M. Porter, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    R. Chifari, S. Lo Piano, S.G.F. Bukkens, and M. Giampietro, Ecological Indicators (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    L.E. Davis, D. Knopman, M.D. Greenberg, L.E. Miller, and A. Doll, Choosing a New Organization for Management and Disposition of Commercial and Defense High-Level Radioactive Materials (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    J. Flynn, R. Kasperson, H. Kunreuther, and P. Slovic, Issues in Science and Technology 8, 42 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Diaz-Maurin.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diaz-Maurin, F., Ewing, R.C. Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview. MRS Advances 5, 253–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.101

Download citation