Abstract
Advanced techniques of network analysis allow the quantification of the indirect interactions and the topological importance of components in ecological interaction networks. In current conservation biology, considering indirect causal effects, identifying keystone species and outlining multispecies approaches begin to be high priority goals. We make an attempt to connect these issues within a network context. Our main interest is to determine the positionally most important set of n nodes in a network, to analyse whether a set of nodes for small n is a subset of another for larger n, and to quantify this nestedness. We apply the KeyPlayer software, a novel tool for network analysis in ecology, introduced originally in mathematical sociology. Topological keystone species complexes are defined, we illustrate the use of this method in a case study and analyse a database of 9 plant-pollinator interaction networks. Our main conclusion is that multispecies approaches may give results very different from single species analyses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- KP:
-
Key Player
References
Allesina, S., A. Bodini, and C. Bondavalli. 2006. Secondary extinctions in ecological networks: bottlenecks unveiled. Ecological Modelling 194:150–161.
Atmar, W. and B.D. Patterson. 1995. The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic programme, including 294 presence-absence matrices. AICS Research, University Park, NM, and The Field Museum, Chicago, IL.
Báldi, A. 2003. Extinction disorders the species composition of metacommunities. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 49:159–165.
Bascompte, J., P. Jordano, C.J. Melián and J. M. Olesen. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100:9383–9387.
Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett and L.C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S.P. 2003a. The Key Player Problem. In: R. Breiger, K. Carley and P. Pattison (eds.), Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, Committee on Human Factors. National Research Council. pp. 241–252.
Borgatti, S.P. 2003b. KeyPlayer. Analytic Technologies. Boston.
Christian, R.R. and C.R. Thomas. 2003. Network analysis of nitrogen inputs and cycling in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Estuaries 26:815–828.
Bronstein, J.M. 2001. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters 4:277–287.
Crooks, K.R. and M.E. Soulé. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566.
Daily, G.C., P.R. Ehrlich and N.M. Haddad. 1993. Double keystone bird in a keystone species complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90:592–594.
Daily, G.C. (ed.) 1997. Nature’s services: social dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Dunne, J.A., R.J. Williams and N.D. Martinez. 2002. Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters 5:558–567.
Fath, B.D. 2004. Distributed control in ecological networks. Ecological Modelling 179:235–245.
Fussmann, G.F. and G. Heber. 2002. Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamics. Ecology Letters 5:394–401.
Gattie, D.K., J.R. Schramski, S.R. Borrett, B.C. Patten, S.A. Bata and S.J. Whipple. 2006. Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Network environ analysis of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, USA—Steady-state analysis. Ecological Modelling 194:162–177.
Ghazoul, J. 2005. Buzziness az usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:367–373.
Harary, F. 1961. Who eats whom? General Systems 6:41–44.
Jordano, P. 1987. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependences, asymmetries and coevolution. American Naturalist 129:657–677.
Jordán, F. 2001. Trophic fields. Community Ecology 2:181–185.
Jordán, F. A. Takács-Sánta and I. Molnár. 1999. A reliability theoretical quest for keystones. Oikos 86:453–462.
Jordán, F. and I. Scheuring. 2002. Searching for keystones in ecological networks. Oikos 99:607–612.
Jordán, F., I. Scheuring and G. Vida. 2002. Species positions and extinction dynamics in simple food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 215:441–448.
Jordán, F., W-C. Liu and F.J.F. Veen. 2003a. Quantifying the importance of species and their interactions in a host-parasitoid community. Community Ecology 4:79–88.
Jordán, F., I. Scheuring and I. Molnár. 2003b. Persistence and flow reliability in simple food webs. Ecological Modelling 161:117–124.
Jordán, F., W-C. Liu and A.J. Davis. 2006. Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos 112:535–546.
Kearns, C.A., D.W. Inouye and N.M. Waser. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:83–112.
Krause, A.E., K.A. Frank, D.M. Mason, R.E. Ulanowicz and W.W. Taylor. 2003. Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature 426:282–285.
Libralato, S., V. Christensen and D. Pauly. 2006. A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecological Modelling 195:153–171.
Memmott, J. 1999. The structure of plant-pollinator food webs. Ecology Letters 2:276–280.
Olesen, J.M., L.I. Eskildsen and S. Venkatasamy. 2002. Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists. Diversity and Distributions 8:181–192.
Paine, R.T. 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist 103:91–93.
Patten, B.C. 1981. Environs: the superniches of ecosystems. American Zoologist 21:845–852.
Patten, B.C. 1991. Concluding remarks. Network ecology: indirect determination of the life-environment relationship in ecosys-tems. In: Higashi, M. and T.P. Burns (eds.), Theoretical Studies of Ecosystems - the Network Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 288–351.
Patten, B.C. 1995. Network integration of ecological extremal principles: exergy, emergy, power, ascendency, and indirect effects. Ecological Modelling 79:75–84.
Quince, C., P.G. Higgs and A.J. McKane. 2005. Deleting species from model food webs. Oikos 110:283–296.
Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83:247–257.
Solé, R.V. and J.M. Montoya. 2001. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:2039–2045.
Vamosi, J.C., T.M. Knight, J.A. Steets, S.J. Mazer, M. Burdand T-L. Ashman. 2006. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103:956–961.
Vasas, V. and F. Jordán. 2006. Topological keystone species in ecological interaction networks: considering link quality and non-trophic effects. Ecological Modelling 196:365–378.
Waser, N.M. and J. Ollerton. 2006. Plant-Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Benedek, Z., Jordán, F. & Báldi, A. Topological keystone species complexes in ecological interaction networks. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 8, 1–7 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.1