Abstract
The process of biological invasions is necessary to understand to prevent future invasions and their negative impacts. Ecological theory and empirical work can provide a framework for approaching the process. Extrinsic factors, such as disturbances, can increase the probability of a successful invasion through several mechanisms. Disturbances may decrease native species’ abundances, decrease species diversity, or change community composition. We conducted a microcosm experiment using a container protozoan and rotifer community to examine how disturbances and the timing of the invasion affected the probability of invasion success. Native species richness significantly decreased with disturbance presence, but total native abundance was not affected. Invader abundance and richness significantly increased with increasing disturbance. Invasion timing had no effect on invasion success, implying that changes in native abundance or biomass did not facilitate or prevent invasions. Several native species that dominated post-disturbance communities had lower abundance levels in no-disturbance and invasion treatments, indicating that species in this community may have exhibited trade-offs between competitive ability and disturbance tolerance. These results suggest that changes in species richness and composition are most important in facilitating invasions, and this may be the result of increased vulnerability to invasion in a post-disturbance community dominated by poor competitors. Understanding how species invasions are facilitated by community characteristics can provide further insight to identifying when communities are most vulnerable and how to prevent invasions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of Variance
References
Bradshaw W.E. and Holzapfel C.M. 1988. Drought and the organization of tree-hole communities. Oecologia 74: 507–514.
Burke M.J.W. and Grime, J.P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77: 776–790.
Chesson P. and Huntly N. 1997. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 150: 519–553.
Collins S.L., Glenn S.M. and Gibson D. J. 1995. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76: 486–492.
Daehler, C.C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Ann. Review Ecol. Syst. 34: 183–211.
D’Antonio, C.M. 1993. Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology 74: 83–95.
Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88: 528–534.
Drake, J.A., Huxel, G.R. and Hewitt, C.L. 1996 Microcosms as models for generating and testing community theory. Ecology 77: 670–677.
Elton, C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London.
Fukami, T. 2001 Sequence effects of disturbance on community structure. Oikos 92: 215–224.
Gonzalez, A.. Lawton, J. H., Gilbert, F. S., Blackburn, T. M. and Evans-Freke, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics, abundance and distribution in a microecosystem. Science 281:2045–2047.
Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in slants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111:1169–1194
Hobbs, R.J. and Huenneke, L.F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6:324–337.
Hodgson, D.J., Rainey, P.B. and Buckling, A. 2002. Mechanisms linking diversity, productivity and invasibility in experimental bacterial communities. Proc. Royal Society of London B: Biol. Sci. 269:2277–2283.
Johnston, I.M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biol. Rev. 61:369–394.
Juliano S.A., O’Meara G.F., Morrill J.R. and Cutwa, M.M. 2002 Dessication and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitos. Oecologia 130:458–469.
Kennedy T.A., Naeem, S., Howe, K.M., Knops J.M.H., Tilman, D., and Reich, P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–638.
Kneitel, J.M. and Chase, J.M. 2004a. Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecology Letters 7:69–80
Kneitel, J.M. and Chase, J.M. 2004b. The interactions among disturbances, predators, and resources alter container community composition. Ecology 85:2088–2093.
Kneitel, J.M. and Miller, T.E. 2002. Resource and top-predator regulation in the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea inquiline community. Ecology 83:680–688.
Kolar, C.S. and Lodge, D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:199–204.
Kotanen, P.M. 1997. Effects of experimental soil disturbance on revegetation by natives and exotics in coastal Californian meadows. J. Appl. Ecol. 34:631–644.
Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology, 2nd edition Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
Levine, J.M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852–854.
Levine, J.M. and D’Antonio, C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26.
Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133–137.
Lonsdale, W.M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536.
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M. and Bazzaz, F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689–710.
McGrady-Steed, J. and Morin, P.J. 1996 Disturbance and the species composition of rain pool microbial communities. Oikos 76:93–102.
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P.M. and Morin, P.J. 1997. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165.
Miller, T.E., Kneitel, J.M. and Burns, J.H. 2002. Effect of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology 83: 898–905.
Mitchell, C.E., Agrawal, A.A., Bever, J.D., Gilbert, G.S., Hufbauer, R.A., Klironomos, J. N., Maron, J.L., Morris, W.F., Parker, I.M., Power, A.G., Seabloom, E.W., Torchin, M.E. and Vázquez D. P. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9:726–740.
Mooney, H.A. and Hobbs, R.J. 2000. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Naeem, S., Knops, J.M.H, Tilman, D., Howe, K.M., Kennedy, T. and Gale, S. 2000. Plant neighborhood diversity increases resistance to invasion in experimental grassland plots. Oikos 91:97–108.
Ostman, O., Kneitel, J.M. and J.M. Chase. 2006. Disturbance alters the effects of habitat isolation on biodiversity. Oikos 114:360–366.
Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Petraitis, P.S., Latham, R.E., and Niesenbaum, R.A. 1989. The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. Quart. Rev. Biol. 64: 393–418.
Robinson, J.V. and Dickerson, J.E. 1987. Does invasion sequence affect community structure?. Ecology 68:587–595.
Shea, K. and Chesson, P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:170–176.
Shea, K., Roxburgh, S.H. and Rauschert, E.S.J. 2004. Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecology Letters 7:491–508.
Srivastava, D.S. and Lawton J.H. 1998. Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am. Nat. 152:510–529.
rivastava, D.S., Kolasa, J., Bengtsson, J., Gonzalez, A., Lawler, S.P., Miller, T.E., Munguia, P., Romanuk, T., Schneider, D.C. and Trzcinski, M.K. 2004. Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:379–384
Sousa, W.P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann. Review Ecol. System. 15:353–391.
Stachowicz, J.J., Whitlatch, R.B. and Osman R.W. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistence in a marine ecosystem. Science 286:1577–1579.
Suding, K.N. and Goldberg, D.A. 2001. Do disturbances alter competitive hierarchies? Mechanisms of change following gap creation. Ecology 82:2133–2149
Thuiller, W., Richardson, D.M., Rouget, M., Proche and Wilson, J.R.U. 2006. Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87:1755–1769.
Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92.
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenko, J. and Melillo, J.M. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.
Wardle, D.A. 2001. Experimental demonstration that plant diversity reduces invasibility – evidence of a biological mechanism or a consequence of sampling effect?. Oikos 95:161–170.
Warren, P.H. 1996. Dispersal and destruction in a multiple habitat system: an experimental approach using protist communities. Oikos 77:317–325.
Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kneitel, J.M., Perrault, D. Disturbance-induced changes in community composition increase species invasion success. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 7, 245–252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.11