Abstract
A drop disc, originally conceived as a quick and easy method of measuring vegetation height, was compared to the more labour-intensive point quadrat pins in terms of usefulness in quantifying the vertical architecture of field-layer vegetation at a number of broadleaved woodland sites in Buckinghamshire, UK. The drop disc produced measures of height which correlated strongly with those of the point quadrat, as well as a potentially useful value corresponding to ‘volume of vegetation’, and it is suggested that this technique was relatively more efficient at producing useful data. A number of measures of architectural complexity showed considerable variation in how they ranked sites based upon both real and contrived data. One of these, Fisher’s (or Williams’) alpha, is shown to be unsuitable for this application. Based upon the weak and non-significant correlations of derived statistics, the practical difficulties in measuring architecture and unfounded assumptions that regard all arthropod species en masse, it is reasoned that explanations of community patterns with respect to architecture must be treated with caution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bokdam, J. and J. Maurits Gleichman. 2000. Effects of grazing by free-ranging cattle on vegetation dynamics in a continental north-west European heathland. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 415–431.
Bright, P. W. and P. A. Morris. 1990. Habitat requirements of Dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in relation to woodland management in Southwest England. Biol. Conserv. 54: 307–326.
Dennis, P., G. B. Usher and A. D. Watt. 1995. Lowland woodland structure and pattern and the distribution of arboreal, phytophagous arthropods. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 728–744.
Denno, R. F. and G. K. Roderick. 1991. Influence of patch size, vegetation texture, and host plant architecture on the diversity, abundance, and life history styles of sap feeding herbivores. In: S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 169–196.
Diaz Narradas, M. C., F. Garcia Novo, M. Collantes and M. Zunzunegui. 2001. Vertical structure of wet grasslands under grazed and non-grazed conditions in Tierra del Fuego. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 385–390.
Fisher, R. A., A. S. Corbet and C. B. Williams. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.
Frontier, S. 1987. Applications of fractal theory to ecology. In: P. Legendre and L. Legendre (eds.), Developments in Numerical Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 335–378.
Gilbert, F. S. 1985. Diurnal activity patterns in hoverflies. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 385–392.
Goldsmith, F. B., C. M. Harrison and A. J. Morton. 1986. Description and analysis of vegetation. In: P.B. Moore and S.B. Chapman (eds.), Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 437–524.
Halaj, J., D. W. Ross and A. R. Moldenke. 2000. Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90: 139–152.
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.
MacArthur, R. H. and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.
McCoy, E. D. and S. S. Bell. 1991. Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: E.D. McCoy, S.S. Bell and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 3–27.
Morse, D. R., J. H. Lawton, M. M. Dodson and M. H. Williamson. 1985. Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314: 731–733.
Murdoch, W. W., F. C. Evans and C. H. Peterson. 1972. Diversity and pattern in plants and insects. Ecology 53: 819–828.
Myers, J. H. and D. Bazely. 1991. Thorns, spines, prickles, and hairs: are they stimulated by herbivory and do they deter herbivores? In: D.W. Tallamy and M.J. Raupp (eds.), Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 325–344.
Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon, London.
Richardson, L. F. 1960. The problem of contiguity: an appendix to statistics of deadly quarrels. In: L. von Bertalanffy (ed.) General Systems Year Book V. Society for General Systems Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 139–187.
Rodwell, J. S. (ed.) 1991. British Plant Communities. Vol. 1. Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenberg, N. J. 1974. Microclimate: the Biological Environment. Wiley, New York.
Sabo, S. R. 1980. Niche and habitat relations in subalpine bird communities of the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Ecol. Monogr. 50: 241–259.
Scheidler, M. 1990. Influence of habitat structure and vegetation architecture on spiders. Zool. Anz. 225: 333–340.
Southwood, T. R. E. 1986. Plant surfaces and insects - an overview. In: B. Juniper and T.R.E. Southwood (eds.), Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, London, pp. 1–22.
Southwood, T. R. E., V. K. Brown and P. M. Reader. 1979. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12: 327–348.
Stewart, K. E. J., N. A. D. Bourn and J. A. Thomas. 2001. An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 1148–1154.
Thomas, J. A. 1980. Why did the Large Blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx 15: 243–247.
Wiens, J. A. 1974. Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 195–213.
Williamson, M. H. and J. H. Lawton. 1991. Measuring habitat structure with fractal geometry. In: S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 69–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Moffatt, C., McNeill, S. & Morton, A.J. The quantification of habitat architecture for explanations of arthropod assemblage patterns: a comparison of two methods. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 6, 83–91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.6.2005.1.9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.6.2005.1.9