Abstract
Species richness, the location of exotic species and heterogeneity (investigated via dissimilarity and via species-area relations) were investigated in relation to spatial scale, in an ecotone between Nothofagus forest and sub-alpine shrubland. The rate of change in ordination score as well as tree diameter and the dripline were used to locate the position of the ecotone. Patterns of species richness were largely scale-independent, with species richness lowest in the forest community, intermediate in the ecotone, highest a short distance into the shrubland, and lower again in the shrubland further from the ecotone. High richness just into the shrubland is attributed to the existence of a fine-scale spatial mosaic pattern of vegetation, though the spatial mass effect may have a role. Exotic species were absent in the forest, but occurred sparsely in the ecotone and in the shrubland, possibly with decreasing frequency away from the ecotone. Community pattern, expressed by species-based dissimilarity and species-area curves, also differed. The ecotone community was the most heterogeneous (indicated by higher dissimilarity values and a steeper species-area slope with higher Arrhenius z-values), with the forest the least heterogeneous and the shrubland intermediate. We conclude that z-values are inter-woven with both habitat and spatial scale, and that this argues against a universal relationship between species and area.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. J. Ecol. 9: 95–99.
Clements, F.E. 1904. Studies in the Vegetation of the State. III. The Development and Structure of Vegetation. The Seminar, University of Nebraska.
Dabrowska-Prot, E., J. Luczak and Z. Wojcik. 1973. Ecological analysis of two invertebrate groups in the wet alder wood and meadow ecotone. Ekol. Polska 21: 753–809.
Dony, J. G. 1977. Species-area relationships in an area of intermediate size. J. Ecol. 65: 475–484.
Gleason, H.A. 1922. On the relation between species and area. Ecology 3: 158–162.
Gosz, J.R. 1991. Fundamental ecological characteristics of landscape boundaries. In: M.M. Holland, P.G. Risser and R.J. Naiman (eds.), Ecotones: the Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 8–30.
Gosz, J.R. 1993. Ecotone hierarchies. Ecol. Applic. 3: 369–376.
Hill, M. O. 2001. Do plant communities exist? A reply to Wilson and Chiarucci. J. Veg Sci. 12: 143–144.
Hill, M.O. and H.G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.
Kilburn, P. D. 1966. Analysis of the species-area relation. Ecology 47:831–843
Kolasa, J. and M. Zalewski. 1995. Notes on ecotone attributes and functions. Hydrobiologia 303: 1–7.
Kullman, L. 1993. Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) tree-limit surveillance during recent decades, central Sweden. Arctic Alp. Res. 25: 24–31.
Laurance, W.F., R. K. Didham and M.E. Power. 2001. Ecological boundaries: a search for synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 70–71.
Lavorel, S., R. H. Gardner and R. V. O’Neill. 1993. Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapes. Oikos 67: 521–528.
Lloyd, K.M., A. A. M. McQueen, B. J. Lee, R. C. B., Wilson, S. Walker and J. B. Wilson. 2000. Evidence on ecotone concepts from switch, environmental and anthropogenic ecotones. J. Veg. Sci. 11:903–910.
McGlone, M.S. and J.L. Bathgate. 1983. Vegetation and climate history of the Longwood Range, South Island, New Zealand, 12 000 B.P. to the present. N. Z. J. Bot. 21: 293–315.
Meiners, S.J. and S.T.A. Pickett. 1999. Changes in community and population responses across a forest-field gradient. Ecography 22:261–267.
Neilson, R.P and L.H. Wullstein. 1983. Biogeography oftwo southwest American oaks in relaton to atmospheric dynamics. J. Biogeogr. 10:275–297.
Odum, E.P 1983. Basic Ecology. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia.
Parsons, M.J., P. Douglass and B. H. Macmillan. 1998. Current names list for wild gymnosperms, dicotyledons and monocotyledons (except grasses) in New Zealand as used in herbarium CHR. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Petts, G.E. 1990. The role of ecotones in aquatic landscape management. In: R. J. Naiman. and H. Decamps (eds.), The Ecology and Management of Aquatic-terrestrial Ecotones, UNESCO, Paris. pp. 103–140.
Pound, R. and F. E. Clements. 1900. The Phytogeography of Nebraska, 2nd ed. Botanical Seminar, Lincoln.
Preston, F.W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43: 185–215 and 410–432.
Risser, P.G. 1995. The status of the science examining ecotones - A dynamic aspect of landscape is the area of steep gradients between more homogeneous vegetation associations. Bioscience 45:318–325.
Shmida, A. and S. Ellner. 1984. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58:29–55
Sorensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter, 5(4), 1–34.
Stanisci, A., D. Lavieri, A. Acosta and C. Blasi. 2000. Structure and diversity at Fagus timberline in central Italy. Community Ecol. 1: 133–138.
Tansley, A.G. and T F. Chipp. 1926. Aims and methods in the study of vegetation. British Empire Vegetation Committee, London.
Van der Maarel, E. 1976. On the establishment of plant community boundaries. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 89: 415–443.
Van der Maarel, E. 1990. Ecotones and ecoclines are different. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 135–138.
Van Leeuwen, C. G. 1966. A relation theoretical approach to pattern and process in vegetation. Wentia 15: 25–46
Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385–397.
Williams, J.A. and C. J. West. 2000. The ecology and management of environmental weeds: foreword. Austral J. Ecol. 25: 423–424.
Wilson, J.B. and A. D. Q. Agnew. 1992. Positive-feedback switches in plant communities. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23: 263–336.
Wilson, J. B. and A. Chiarucci. 2000. Do plant communities exist? Evidence from scaling-up local species-area relations to the regional level. J. Veg Sci. 11: 773–775.
Wilson, J.B. and A. Chiarucci. 2001. Self-similarity and phantoms: a response to Hill. J. leg. Sci. 12:299.
Yodzis, P. 1978. Competition for space and the structure of ecological communities. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Zólyomi, B. 1987. Coenotone, ecotone and their role in preserving relic species. Acta Bot. Hung. 33:3–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Stowe, C.J., Kissling, W.D., Ohlemüller, R. et al. Are ecotone properties scale-dependent? A test from a Nothofagustreeline in southern New Zealand. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 4, 35–42 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.4