Abstract
Clonal populations are hierarchically organized: genetic individuals (genets) can consist of many physiological individuals (ramets). Each ramet takes up resources from its local environment, but the resource pattern can be reorganized within the clone by transport between ramets. Thus, an integrated clone is not directly subject to the pattern of resource availability in its habitat. Local shortages can be compensated, hence, the clone can ‘buffer’ itself against spatio-temporal heterogeneity in the habitat. We modelled a series of habitat types, assuming that one limiting resource was patchily distributed in space, and could fluctuate over time. Habitat types differed in the density, size and persistence of resource patches, and in the contrast between resource-rich patches and the resource-poor background. We applied an individual-based, spatially explicit population dynamic model to compare the performance of two plant strategies in these habitat types. In the Integrator, ramets that were interconnected distributed the resource evenly. In the Splitter, no resource translocation occurred. First we observed population growth of the two strategies separately, then in competition. We found a range of habitat types, where none of the strategies was viable, because of the scarcity of resource patches. As the density of resource patches was increased, first only the Integrator could persist. Then, at intermediate densities of resource patches, the Splitter became viable, and, being a stronger competitor, excluded the Integrator. Finally, at high resource-patch densities, the Integrator occupied the area again. Since the Splitter was viable at high density of resource patches when growing alone, its disappearance is more due to spontaneous extinction, due to competitive exclusion by the Integrator. We predict, therefore, the dominance of integrated clones both in extremely unproductive and productive environments, but for different reasons. It is important to note that this trend was observable only at high spatial and temporal variation in resource availability. Less contrast between patches of different quality, smaller patch sizes, or longer persistence of patches facilitated the dominance of the Splitter. Thus, buffering is advantageous in many but not all habitat types.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alpert, P. 1996. Does clonal growth increase plant performance in natural communities? In: B. Oborny and J. Podani (eds). Clonality in Plant Communities. Opulus Press, Uppsala, pp. 11–16.
Alpert, P. 1999. Clonal integration in Fragaria chiloensis differs between populations: ramets from grassland are selfish. Oecologia 120:69–76.
Alpert, P., C. Holzapfel and J.M. Benson. 2002. Hormonal control of resource sharing in the clonal plant Fragaria chiloensis. Funct. Ecol. 16:191–197.
Alpert, P., C. Holzapfel and C. Slominski. 2003. Differences in performance between genotypes of Fragaria chiloensis with different degrees of resource sharing. J. Ecol. 91:27–35.
Alpert, P. and H.A. Mooney. 1986. Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis. Oecologia 70:227–233.
Alpert, P. and E.L. Simms. 2002. The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust. Evol. Ecol. 16:285–297.
Alpert, P. and J. Stuefer. 1997. Division of labour in clonal plants. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds). The Evolution and Ecology of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 137–154.
Birch, C.P.D. and M.J. Hutchings. 1994. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J. Ecol. 82:653–664.
Cain, M.L., D. Dudle and J.P. Evans. 1996. Spatial models of foraging in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 83:76–85.
Caraco, T. and C.K. Kelly. 1991. On the adaptive value of physiological integration in clonal plants. Ecology 72:81–93.
Cook, R.E. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant populations. In: J.B.C. Jackson, L.W. Buss and R.E. Cook (eds). Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. pp. 259–296.
Crawley, M.J. 1997. Life history and environment. In: M.J. Crawley (ed.). Plant Ecology. Blackwell Science Ltd., pp. 73–131.
de Kroon, H. and F. Schieving. 1990. Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy. In: J. van Groenendael and H. de Kroon (eds). Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. SPB Academic Publ., Leiden, pp. 113–130.
de Kroon, H. and J. van Groenendael. 1990. Regulation and function of clonal growth in plants: an evaluation. In: J. van Groenendael and H. de Kroon (eds). Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. pp. 177–186.
D’Hertefeldt, T and W.H. van der Putten. 1998. Physiological integration of the clonal plant Carex arenaria and its response to siol-borne pathogens. Oikos 81:229–237.
Dickmann, U., R. Law and J.A.J. Metz. 2000. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Klimeš, L., J. Klimešova, R. Hendriks and J. van Groenendael. 1997. Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds). The Evolution and Ecology of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 1–30.
Landa, K., B. Benner, M.A. Watson and J. Gartner. 1992. Physiological integration for carbon in mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum), a clonal perennial herb. Oikos 63:348–356.
Marshall, C. 1990. Source-sink relations of interconnected ramets. In: J. van Groenendael and H. de Kroon (eds). Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague. pp. 23–42.
Marshall, C. and E.A.C. Price. 1997. Sectoriality and its implications for physiological integration. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds). The Evolution and Ecology of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp. 79–107.
Noble, J.C. and C. Marshall. 1983. The population biology of plants with clonal growth II. The nutrient strategy and modular physiology of Carex arenaria. J. Ecol. 71:865–877.
Oborny, B. and S. Bartha. 1996. Clonality in plant communities: an overview. In: B. Oborny and J. Podani (eds). Clonality in Plant Communities. Opulus Press, Uppsala, pp. 115–127.
Oborny, B. and M.L. Cain. 1997. Models of spatial spread and foraging in clonal plants. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds). The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publ., Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 115–127.
Oborny, B., T Czárán and Á. Kun. 2001. Exploration of resource patches by clonal growth: a spatial model on the effect of transport between modules. Ecol. Model. 141:151–169.
Oborny, B. and Á. Kun. 2002. Fragmentation of clones: How does it influence dispersal and competitive ability? Evol. Ecol. 15:319–346.
Oborny, B., Á. Kun, T. Czárán and S. Bokros. 2000. The effect of clonal integration on plant competition for mosaic habitat space. Ecology 81:3291–3304.
Pennings, S.C. and R.M. Callaway. 2000. The advantage of clonal integration under different ecological conditions: a community-wide test. Ecology 81:709–716.
Peterson, C.J. and R.H. Jones. 1997. Clonality in woody plants: a review and comparison with clonal herbs. In: J. van Groenendael and H. de Kroon (eds). The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. pp. 263–290
Suzuki, J. and M.J. Hutchings. 1997. Interactions between shoots in clonal plants and the effects of stored resources on the structure of shoot populations. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds). The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp. 311–330.
Suzuki, J. and J. Stuefer. 1999. On the ecological and evolutionary significance of storage in clonal plants. Plant Species Biology 14:11–17.
van Kleunen, M., M. Fischer and B. Schmid. 2000. Clonal integration in Ranunculus reptans: by-product or adaptation? J. Evol. Biol. 13:237–248.
Vourisalo, T., J. Tuomi, B. Pedersen and P. Kaar. 1997. Hierarchical selection in clonal plants. In: H. De Kroon and J. van Groenedael (eds). The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. pp. 243–262.
Watson, M.A. 1986. Integrated physiological units in plants. TREE 1:119–123.
Wennström, A. 1999. The effect of systematic rusts and smuts on clonal plants in natural systems. Plant Ecology 141:93–97.
Wijesinghe, D.K. 1994. Temporal and structural components of ramet independence in the clonal perennial herb, Potentilla simplex. J. Ecol. 82:13–20.
Wijesinghe, D.K. and S.N. Handel. 1994. Advantages of clonal growth in heterogeneous habitats: an experiment with Potentilla simplex. J. Ecol. 82:495–502.
Wijesinghe, D.K. and M.J. Hutchings. 1997. The effects of spatial scale of environmental heterogeneity on the growth of a clonal plant: an experimental study with Glechoma hederacea. J. Ecol 85:17–28.
Wijesinghe, D.K. and M.J. Hutchings. 1999. The effect of environmental heterogeneity on the performance of Glechoma hederacea: the interactions between patch contrast and patch scale. J. Ecol. 87:860–872.
Wijesinghe, D.K. and D.F. Whigham. 2001. Nutrient foraging in woodland herbs: a comparison of three species of Uvularia (Liliaceae) with contrasting belowground morphologies. Am. J. Bot. 88:1071–1079.
Wilhalm, T. 1996. A comparative study of clonal fragmentation in tussock-forming grasses. In: B. Oborny and J. Podani (eds). Clonality in Plant Communities. Opulus Press, Uppsala. pp. 51–60.
Yu, F., Y. Chen and M. Dong. 2002. Clonal integration enhances survival and performance of Potentilla anserina, suffering from partial sand burial on Ordos plateau, China. Evol. Ecol. 15:303–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kun, Á., Oborny, B. Survival and competition of clonal plant populations in spatially and temporally heterogeneous habitats. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 4, 1–20 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.1