Abstract
Indexing and mapping of co-occurrence for multiple species is central to many analyses of conservation needs, ecosystem health, and community composition. Species richness is often used because of its simplicity and interpretability, but a variety of ecologically based weighting schemes for species have been developed for special purposes such as determining biotic integrity. This work is concerned with indexing a balance between common and uncommon species for preliminary assessments of conservation needs. A Regional Habitat Importance Index is constructed in a manner that provides joint ordering of species and landscapes. The index lends emphasis to species having a scarcity of habitat over a region, low representation in conservation areas, and shortage of opportunity for expanding protection. Application of the index is illustrated for mammals and birds in the context of GAP Analysis for the state of Pennsylvania, USA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- RHII:
-
Regional Habitat Importance Index
References
Angermeier, P. L. and J. R. Karr. 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: protecting biotic resources. Bioscience 44: 690–697.
Bradford, D. F., S. E. Franson, G. R. Miller, A. C. Neale, G. E. Cantebury and D. T. Heggen. 1998. Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 49: 1–22.
Brauning, D. W., M. C. Brittingham, D. A. Gross, R. C. Leberman, T. L. Master and R. S. Mulvihill. 1994. Pennsylvania breeding birds of special concern: A list rationale and status update. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 68: 3–28.
Brooks, R. P., T. J. O’Connell, D. H. Wardrop and L. E. Jackson. 1998. Towards a regional index of biological integrity: The example of forested riparian ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51: 131–143.
Curnutt, J., J. Lockwood, H. Luh, P. Nott and G. Russell. 1994. Hotspots and species diversity. Nature 367: 326–327.
Davis, F. W., D. M. Stoms, J. E. Estes, J. Scepan and J. M. Scott. 1990. An information systems approach to biological diversity. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 4:55–78.
Genoways, H. H. and F. J. Brenner. 1985. Species of Special Concern in Pennsylvania. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA.
Harcourt, A. H. 2000. Coincidence and mismatch of biodiversity hotspots: a global survey for the order, primates. Biological Conservation 93: 163–175.
Hassinger, J. D., R. J. Hill, G. L. Storm and R. H. Yahner (eds.) 1998. Inventory and Monitoring of Biotic Resources in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Biological Survey, Harrisburg, PA.
Kiester, A. R., J. M. Scott, B. Csuti, R. F. Noss, B. Butterfield, K. Sahr and D. White. 1996. Conservation prioritization using GAP data. Conservation Biology 10: 1332–1342.
Loehle, C. and G. Wein. 1994. Landscape habitat diversity: a multiscale information theory approach. Ecol. Model. 73:311–329.
Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.
Myers, W., J. Bishop, R. Brooks, T O’Connell, D. Argent, G. Storm, J. Stauffer, Jr. and R. Carline. 2000. The Pennsylvania GAP Analysis Final Report. 2000. The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802.
Noss, R. F. and A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature’s Legacy. Island Press, Washington, D. C.
O’Connell, T. J., L. E. Jackson and R. P. Brooks. 1998. A bird community index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51: 145–156.
Olivieri, S. T and E. H. Backus. 1992. Geographic information systems (GIS) applications in biological conservation. Biology International 25: 10–16.
Pimm, S. L. and J. Lawton. 1998. Planning for biodiversity. Science 279: 2068–2069.
Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, R. M. Lawton, B. C. Eversham and D. W. Gibbons. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.
Pressey, R. L., C. J. Humphries, C. R. Margules, R. I. Vane-Wright and P. H. Williams. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 124–128.
Reid, W. V. 1998. Biodiversity hotspots. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 275–280.
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Samson, F. B. and F. L. Knopf. 1993. Managing biological diversity. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 509–514.
Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Custi, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D’Erchia, T. C. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman and R. G. Wright. 1993. Gap Analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs No. 123.
Shepard, U. L. 1998. A comparison of species diversity and morphological diversity across the North American latitudinal gradient. J. Biogeogr. 25: 19–29.
Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Fund. Ecol. 3: 385–397.
Williams, P., D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries and R. Pressey. 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complimentary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10: 155–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, W., Bishop, J., Brooks, R. et al. Composite spatial indexing of regional habitat importance. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 2, 213–220 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.2.9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.2.9