Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrology effects on propagule bank expression and vegetation in six Carolina bays

  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrology, which filters propagule bank expression, differs among Carolina bay wetlands. We examined the relationships among hydrology, recruitment from the propagule bank, and bay vegetation over one season in six herbaceous bays that differ in hydroperiod. Sediment cores were taken at distances from each bay center representing 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% full water level and subjected to flooded, midsummer drawdown, or moist soil conditions in an outdoor mesocosm experiment. Vegetation from the cores was compared among hydrology treatments and with bay vegetation. In bay vegetation, species richness and dissimilarity, calculated among replicate plots at each distance, increased from flooded bay centers toward the margins, where water level fluctuated. Among bays, vegetation richness increased from more pond-like bays to the flashiest bay. Within bays, vegetation graded from obligate wetland species to a mixture of obligate and facultative species from center to margin. The flooding treatment promoted convergence on obligate wetland floating-leaved and emergent species, low species richness, and high community similarity of vegetation from the sediment cores. Our research supports the hypothesis that hydrology filters recruitment and species distribution in Carolina bays. The extent of inundated, fluctuating water, and exposed sediment areas can determine seasonal vegetation organization in such wetlands. Vegetation in wetlands with steep basins and stable hydrology is more likely zoned; dominant species show discontinuous distributions along the flooding gradient. In contrast, fluctuating hydrology in shallow basins results in unzoned vegetation, with more continuous species distributions from wetland center toward the margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

KW:

Kruskal-Wallis

SAS:

Statistical Analysis System

SREL:

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory

SRS:

Savannah River Site

References

  • Bauder, E. T. 1989. Drought stress and competition effects on the local distribution of Pogogyne abramsii. Ecology 70:1083–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. H. and J. B. Nelson. 1991. Distribution and status of Carolina bays in South Carolina. Nongame and Heritage Trust Publications No. 1. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Columbia SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D. and S. M. Yeh. 1994. Cooperative and competitive interactions in the recruitment of marsh elders. Ecology 75:2416–2429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, C. W. P. M. and L. A. C. J. Voesenek. 1996. Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. TREE 11:290–296.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin, C. and P. A. Keddy. 1993. A functional classification of wetland plants. J. Veg. Sci. 4:313–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. S. and G. R. Wein. 1995. Seed bank and vegetation of a constructed reservoir. Wetlands 15:374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steven, D. 1994. Patterns of vegetation diversity among Carolina bays and depression wetlands on the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. Unpub. Report. 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven, D. and M. Toner. 1997. Gradient analysis and classification of Carolina bay vegetation: a framework for bay wetlands conservation and restoration. Unpub. Report for U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 53 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, J. and H. S. Greening. 1989. Marsh seed banks of the Okefenokee swamp: effects of hydrologic regime and nutrients. Ecology 70:750–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. B. 1990. On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. In: J. B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., pp. 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. B. and R. G. Wetzel. 1998. Long-term dynamics of Typha populations. Aquatic Bot. 61:137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, S. D. and M. D. Bertness. 1999. Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 80:2064–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, B.W. and S. L. Collins. 1997. Heterogeneity in shortgrass prairie vegetation: the role of playa lakes. J. Veg. Sci. 8:277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C., T. L. Sharik, R. A. Mayes, and E. P. Smith. 1987. Nature and cause of zonation discreteness around glacial prairie marshes. Can. J. Bot. 65:1622–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. 1983. Shoreline vegetation in Axe Lake, Ontario: effects of exposure on zonation patterns. Ecology 64:331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. 2000. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. and P. MacLellan. 1990. Centrifugal organization in forests. Oikos 59:75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1982. The role of seed banks in the persistence of Ontarios Coastal Plain flora. Amer. J. Bot. 69:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, W. R. and W. T. Batson. 1955. An ecological study of the land plants and cold-blooded vertebrates of the Savannah River Project area. Part VI. Conspicuous vegetational zonation in a ACarolina bay.@ University of South Carolina Publication, Biology Series III, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, J., G. R. Guntenspergen, and J. Grace. 1989. Vegetation and hydrologic characteristics of Carolina bays. Unpub. Report for the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, SRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., 1992. Cyclical Vegetation Dynamics in Carolina Bay Wetlands. PhD Thesis, University of Georgia. Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., R. F. Lide, G. R. Wein, and R. R. Sharitz. 1996. Vegetation changes and land-use legacies of depression wetlands of the western coastal plain of South Carolina: 1951-1992. Wetlands 16:564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. and R. R. Sharitz. 1994. Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina Bays in South Carolina. Ecol. Applications 4:177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck, M. A., and K. J. Graveline. 1979. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal marsh. Amer. J. Bot. 66:1006–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1994. Tidal freshwater wetland zonation: seed and seedling dynamics. Aquatic Bot. 47:61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen, J., F. Menting, W. van der Putten, and K. Blom. 1999. Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient. Oikos 86:523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessman, J. M., I. A. Mendelssohn, M.W. Hester, and K. L. McKee. 1997. Population variation in growth response to flooding of three marsh grasses. Ecol. Engineering 8:31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lide, R. F., V. G. Meentemeyer, J. E. Pinder, L. M. Beatty. 1995. Hydrology of a Carolina Bay located on the upper Coastal-Plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15:47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, 2nd Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, V. T. and M. A. Leck. 1985. Relationships of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. Amer. J. Bot. 72:161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani, K. A., and P. M. Dixon. 1995. Seed banks of Carolina bays: potential contributions from surrounding landscape vegetation. Amer. Midland Nat. 131:140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles and C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, T. E., D. J. Karapatakis, K. K. Guy, J. E. Pinder III, and H. E. Mackey Jr. 1998. The relative effects of water depth, fetch and other physical factors on the development of macrophytes in a small southeastern US pond. Aquatic Bot. 61:289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS 7.0. Statistical Analysis System version 7.0. SAS Institute. Cary, NC.

  • Sabine, B. J. 1992. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands Region 2 - Southeast. Resource Management Group, Inc., Grand Haven, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalles, J. F., R. R. Sharitz, J.W. Gibbons, G. J. Leversee, and J. N. Knox. 1989. Carolina Bays of the Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina. SRO-NERP-18. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schalles, J. F. and D. J. Shure. 1989. Hydrology, community structure, and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina bay wetland. Ecol. Monog. 59:365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 1986. Life history of the northern mole cricket, Neocurtilla hexadactyla (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), utilizing Carolina-bay habitats. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79:256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R.D., D. E. Scott, J. H. K. Pechmann, and J.W. Gibbons. 1996. Structure and dynamics of an amphibian community: evidence from a 16-year study of a natural pond. In: M. L. Cody and J. A. Smallwoods (eds.), Long-term Studies of Vertebrate Communities. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp. 217–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. and J. W. Gibbons, J. W. 1982. The ecology of southeastern shrub bogs (pocosins) and Carolina bays: a community profile. U. S. Fish andWildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/04.93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. and C. A. Gresham. 1998. Pocosins and Carolina Bays. In: Messina, M. G. and W. H. Conner (eds.), Southern Forested Wetlands Ecology and Management. CRC Press LLC, pp. 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, B. and M. Parent. 1991. Germination responses of 64 wetland species in relation to seed size, minimum time to reproduction and seedling relative growth rate. Funct. Ecol. 5:111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.M. and J. A. Kadlec. 1983. Seed banks and their role during drawdown of a North American marsh. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G., and C. B. Davis. 1976. The seed banks of prairie glacial marshes. Can. J. Bot. 54:1832–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59:322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, S.W. and McLeod, K. M., 1990. Vegetation of the Savannah River Site: Major Community Types. SRO-NERP-19, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. S. Collins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, B.S., Battaglia, L.L. Hydrology effects on propagule bank expression and vegetation in six Carolina bays. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 2, 21–33 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.3

Keywords

Navigation