Skip to main content
Log in

A remarkable remnant mesic deciduous forest stand: are composition and structure of old-growth retained?

  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Old-growth forests are declining throughout eastern North America, especially toward the northern limit of the deciduous formation where gently undulating topography and milder climate especially encourage human activity. Remnants exist, but do they retain the defining characteristics of the original vegetation? The objective was to marshal information required to answer this question, and toward this objective we assessed vegetation in a small 1 ha remnant of maple-beech forest with no history of past logging and compared it to well known and larger old-growth areas in the region. We used Curtis’s (1959) Point Quarter method to provide full quantitative data for trees, saplings, shrub and herbs. Size class distribution of trees and successional status of the stand were assessed. As a general conclusion, we found that tree species richness of our remnant was higher than most recognized large old-growth forests and, while the herbaceous understorey was poorer in species than larger tracts, it exhibited three provincially rare species. Furthermore, the successional status and structural complexity of the remnant were typical of old-growth forests. In overall comparative terms, the remnant was found not be an outlier when ordinated with larger forests. It thus is safe to conclude that this remnant constitutes an ecological benchmark well worth protection, despite its limited size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

asl:

above sea level

BABH:

basal area 1 m above ground

DBH:

diameter 1 m above ground

DCA:

detrended correspondence analysis

DF:

density-frequency index or sum of relative frequency and relative density

DFD:

sum of relative density; relative frequency and relative dominance also called importance value

UWO:

University of Western Ontario

References

  • Ball, P.W., and D.J. White. 1982. Cyperaceae. In: G.W. Argus and D.J. White (eds.), Atlas of the Rare Vascular Plants of Ontario. Botany Division; National Museum of Science, Ottawa, pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, J., Y. Bergeron and A. Bouchard. 1992. The history and tree stratum of an old-growth forest of Haut-Saint-Laurent Region, Quebec. Nat. Areas J. 12:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D.M., and E. Nol. 1998. Edge and fragment size effects on the vegetation of deciduous forests in Ontario, Canada. Nat. AreasJ. 18:45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wis-consin Press. Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreimanis, A., C.G. Winder, and R.A. Altonen. 1998. London, Ontario: Geology. Geomorphology. Geodata. In: P.F. Karrow and O.L. White (eds), Urban Geology of Canadian Cities. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 42. pp. 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M.L. 1950. Gray’s Manual of Botany. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeck, J.R. 1988. Old-growth forests in the northern Rocky Moun-tains. Nat. Areas J. 8:202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. and H.G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended Correspondence Analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay, O., P. Endels, H. Vereecken, and M. Hermy. 1999. The role of patch area and habitat diversity in explaining native plant species richness in disturbed suburban forest patches in Northern Belgium. Biodiversity Research 5:129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.L., and A.S. White. 1997. Ecological thresholds and the definition of old-growth forest stands. Nat. AreasJ. 17:292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juday, G.P. 1988. Old-growth forests and natural areas: an introduction. Nat. Areas J. 8:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, C. 1984. Celastraceae. In: G.W. Argus and D.J. White (eds), Atlas of the Rare Vascular Plants of Ontario. Botany Division, National Museum of Science, Ottawa, pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.J., C. Reschke and D.S. Smith. 1988. Old-growth forests of Adirondack Park, New York. Nat. AreasJ. 8:166–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverett, R. 1991. Identifying old-growth forest in the East. Wild Earth 1:30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverett, R. 1996. Definitions and history. In: M.B. Davis (ed), East-ern Old-growth Forests. Island Press, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W.H. 1992. Characteristics of old-growth mixed mesophytic forests. Nat. Areas J. 12:127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maycock, P.F. 1963. The phytosociology of the deciduous forests of extreme southern Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 41:379–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNab, J. 1835. On the local distribution of different species of trees in the native forests of America. Quarterly Journal of Agriculture 5:594–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki, G.J., and P.A. Trianonsky. 1993. Literature on old-growth forests of eastern North America. Nat. Areas J. 13:87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C.D., and B.C. Larson. 1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.R. 1989. Old-growth forests of the central hardwood regions. Nat. Areas J. 9:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G.F. 1992. Conservation of old growth: a European perspective. Nat. Areas J. 12:10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R.D. 1987. Old-growth definition, classification and application. USDA Forest Service, Final Contract Report RFQ 185-131Q.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J.R. 1996. Central mesophytic forests. In: M. B. David (ed.), Eastern Old-growth Forests. Island Press, pp. 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, R.A., and J.F. Franklin. 1988. Old growth and forest dynamics in the Douglas-Fir Region of Western Oregon and Washington. Nat. Areas J. 8:190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrrell, L.E., G.L. Nowacki, T.R. Crow, D.S. Buckley, E.A. Navertz, J.N. Niese, J.L. Rollinger, and J.C. Zasada. 1998. Information about old growth for selected forest type groups in the eastern United States. USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. NC-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R.W., K.P. Lertzman and S.C. Saunders. 1998. Old-growth definitions for the forests of British Columbia, Canada. Nat. Areas J. 18:279–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Fahselt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maycock, P.F., Fahselt, D. A remarkable remnant mesic deciduous forest stand: are composition and structure of old-growth retained?. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 2, 121–132 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.13

Keywords

Navigation