Abstract
A new approach to the measurement of functional diversity based on two-state nominal traits is developed from the florula diversity concept of P. Juhász-Nagy. For evaluating functional diversity of an assemblage, first a traits by species matrix is compiled. Various information theory functions are used to examine structural properties in this matrix, including the frequency distribution of trait combinations. The method is illustrated by actual examples, the first from plant communities prone to fire in Spain, and the second from running water invertebrate assemblages in Hungary. The results suggest that of the various functions used the standardized joint entropy, termed combinatorial functional evenness supplies most meaningful results. In plant communities, high fire recurrence decreased combinatorial functional evenness, while this measure for freshwater assemblages was uncorrelated with stream width and negatively correlated with the degree of human impact. Stream width is negatively correlated with the number of manifested functional combinations. In both case studies, combinatorial functional evenness has an inverse relationship to species richness – i.e., fewer species have a larger chance to produce equiprobable functional combinations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CFD:
-
Combinatorial functional diversity
- CFE:
-
Combinatorial functional evenness
- CFR:
-
Combinatorial functional richness
- FA:
-
Functional associatum
- FD:
-
Functional diversity
- FH:
-
Functional heterogeneity
References
Ackerly, D.D. 2004. Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 25–44.
Cornwell, W.K., Schwilk, D.W. and Ackerly, D.D. 2006. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87: 1465–1471.
de Bello, F., Lavergne, S., Meynard, C.N., Lepš, J. and Thuiller, W. 2010. The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. J. Veg. Sci. 21: 992–1000.
Erős, T., Heino, J., Schmera, D. and Rask, M. 2009. Characterising functional trait diversity and trait-environment relationships in fish assemblages of boreal lakes. Freshw. Biol. 54: 1788–1803.
Gross, N., Suding, K.N. and Lavorel, S. 2007. Leaf dry matter content and lateral spread predict response to land use change for six subalpine grassland species. J. Veg. Sci. 18: 289–300.
Heino, J. 2005. Functional biodiversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along major ecological gradients of boreal headwater streams. Freshw. Biol. 50: 1578–1587.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1984. Spatial dependence of plant populations. Part 2. A family of new models. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 30: 363–402.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1993. Notes on compositional diversity. Hydrobiologia 249: 173–182.
Juhász-Nagy, P. and Podani, J. 1983. Information theory methods for the study of spatial processes and succession. Vegetatio 51:129–140.
Kattge, J. et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biol. 17: 2905–2935.
Kühner, A. and Kleyer, M. 2008. A parsimonious combination of functional traits predicting plant response to disturbance and soil fertility. J. Veg. Sci. 19: 681–692.
Lavorel, S., Grigulis, K., McIntyre, S., Williams, N.S.G., Garden, D., Dorrough, J., Berman, S., Quetier, F., Thebault, A. and Bonis, A. 2008. Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters! Funct. Ecol. 22: 134–147.
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Maire, V., Gross, N., Wirth, C., Pontes, L.D.S., Proulx, R., Börger, L., Soussana, J-F. and Loualt, F. 2012. Habitat-filtering and niche differentiation jointly determine species relative abundance within grassland communities along fertility and disturbance gradients. New Phytol. 196: 497–509.
Mason, N.W.H., Mouillot, D., Lee, W.G. and Wilson, J.B. 2005. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111: 112–118.
McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. and Westoby, M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. TREE 21: 178–185.
Moog, O. 1995. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. Lieferung Mai/95. Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Wien.
Mouchet, M., Villéger, S., Mason, N.W.H. and Mouillot, D. 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol. 24: 867–876.
Mouillot, D., Culioli, J.M., Pelletier, D. and Tomasini, J.A. 2008. Do we protetct biological originality in protected areas? A new index and an application to the Bonifacio Strait Natural Reserve. Biol. Cons. 141: 1569–1580.
Orlóci, L. 1969. Information theory models for hierarchic and non-hierarchic classifications. In: Cole, A.D. (ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. Academic, London. pp. 148–164.
Orlóci, L. 1991. On character-based plant community analysis: choice, arrangement, comparison. In: Feoli, E. and Orlóci, L. (eds.), Computer Assisted Vegetation Analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 81– 86.
Pausas, J.G. and Verdú, M. 2008. Fire reduces morphospace occupation in plant communities. Ecology 89: 2181–2186.
Pausas, J.G. and Verdú, M. 2010. The jungle of methods for evaluating phenotypic and phylogenetic structure of communities. BioScience 60: 614–625.
Pavoine, S., Gasc, A., Bonsall, M.B. and Mason, N.W.M. 2013. Correlation between phylogenetic and functional diversity: mathematical artefacts or true ecological and evolutionary process? J. Veg. Sci, 24: 781–793.
Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285–307.
Petchey, O.L. and Gaston, K.J. 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9: 741–758.
Pillar, V.D. and Orlóci, L. 2004. Character-Based Community Analysis: The Theory and an Application Program. Electronic Edition available at https://doi.org/ecoqua.ecologia.ufrgs.br.
Podani, J. 1993. SYN/TAX 5 User’s Manual. Scientia, Budapest
Podani J. 2001. SYN-TAX 2000. Computer programs for data analysis in ecology and systematics. User’s Manual. Scientia, Budapest.
Podani, J. 2009. Convex hulls, habitat filtering, and functional diversity: mathematical elegance versus ecological interpretability. Community Ecol. 10: 244–250.
Podani, J. and Schmera, D. 2006. On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115: 179–185.
Poff, N.L., Olden, J.D., Vieira, N.K.M., Finn, D.S., Simmons, M.P. and Kondratieff, B.C. 2006. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J. North Amer. Benthological Soc. 25: 730–755.
Ricotta, C. 2003. On parametric evenness measures. J. Theor. Biol. 222: 189–197.
Ricotta, C. and Moretti, M. 2011. CWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia 167: 181–188.
Roscher, C., Schumacher, J., Gubsch, M., Lipowsky, A., Weigelt, A., Buchmann, N., Schmid, B. and Schulze, E.D. 2012. Using plant functional traits to explain diversity–productivity relationships. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0036760
Schmera, D. and Baur, B. 2011. Testing a typology system of running waters for conservation planning in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 665: 183–194.
Schmera, D., Erős, T. and Podani, J. 2009. A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities. Aquat. Ecol. 43: 157–167.
Smith, B. and Wilson, J.B. 1996. A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76: 70–82.
Taillie, C. 1979. Species equitability: a comparative approach. In: Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W.K. and Taillie, C. (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, MD, pp. 51–62.
Troussellier, M. and Legendre, P. 1981. A functional diversity index for microbial ecology. Microbial. Ecol. 7: 283–292.
Tuomisto, A. 2012. An updated consumer’s guide to evenness and related indices. Oikos 121: 1203–1218.
Verdú, M. and Pausas, J.G. 2007. Fire drives phylogenetic clustering in Mediterranean Basin woody plant communities. J. Ecol. 95: 1316–323
Villéger, S., Mason, N.W.H. and Mouillot, D. 2008. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89: 2290–2301.
Whittaker, R.H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Podani, J., Ricotta, C., Pausas, J.G. et al. Combinatorial functional diversity: an information theoretical approach. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14, 180–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.2.8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.2.8