Abstract
Spiders contribute essentially to the arthropod community of forests and are known to be distributed in non-random pattern according to environmental, structural, competitive, and predacious conditions. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of the distance to trees on the distribution pattern of soil-dwelling spiders. We verified the hypothesis that stem-close and stem-distant microhabitats differ with respect to taxonomical and ecological characteristics of spider assemblages, hence, functional significance on a small spatial scale. Ground-dwelling spiders were collected with pitfall traps in positions close (20-30 cm) and distant (2 m) to the stem bases in mature forests of different stand types (spruce, Douglas fir, beech-spruce, oak-beech). To identify significant drivers of spider assemblage composition, environmental parameters were assessed in relation with the arrangement of pitfall traps. The study documented significant variability in the composition of spider assemblages of stem-close and stem-distant pitfall traps within each of the study sites. The position of traps strongly affected species richness, species composition, activity density, and dominance structure. Thus, sampling at both positions revealed that the species richness of spiders is spatially restricted. Moreover, spider assemblage structure differed in the classification of species to size and ecological preference. Those results implicate potential consequences for their functional role in forests in relation to the distance to the trees.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 26: 32–46.
Anderson, M.J. 2004. DISTMLM v.5: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Begon, M.E, Harper, JL and Townsend, C.R. 1996. Ecology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Berg, M.P. and Bengtsson, J. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in soil food web structure. Oikos 116: 1789–1804.
Boettcher, S.E. and Kalisz, P.J. 1990. Single-tree influence on soil properties in the mountains of Eastern Kentucky. Ecology 71: 1365–1372.
Bonn, A. and Schröder, B. 2001. Habitat models and their transfer for single and multi species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography 24: 483–496.
Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T., 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.
Bultman, T.L., Uetz, G.W. and Brady, A.R. 1982. A comparison of cursorial spider communities along a successional gradient. J. Arachnol. 10: 23–33.
Bultmann, T.L. and Uetz, G.W. 1984. Effect of structure and nutritional quality of litter on abundances of litter-dwelling arthropods. Am. Midl. Nat. 111 (11):165–172.
Castro, A. and Wise, D.H. 2009. Influence of fine woody debris on spider diversity and community structure in forest leaf litter. Biodivers. Conserv. 18 (14):3705–3731.
Chen, B.R. and Wise, D.H. 1999. Bottom-up limitation of preda-ceous arthropods in a detritus-based terrestrial food web. Ecology 80: 761–772.
Churchill, T.B. and Arthur, M. 1999. Measuring spider richness: effects of different sampling methods and spatial and temporal scales. J. Ins. Conserv. 3: 287–295.
Dajoz, R. 2000. Insects and Forests. The Role and Diversity of Insects in Forest Environment. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris.
Deschaseaux, A. and Ponge, J.F. 2001. Changes in the composition of humus profiles near the trunk base of an oak tree [Quercus petraea (Mattus.) Liebl.]. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37: 9–16.
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monographs 67(3):345–366.
Erdmann, G., Floren, A., Linsenmair, K.E., Scheu, S. and Maraun, M. 2006. Little effect of forest age on oribatid mites on the bark of trees. Pedobiologia 50: 433–441.
Frank, J.H. 1967. The insects predators of pupal stage of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hydriomeni-dae). J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 375–389.
Frick, H., Nentwig, W. and Kropf, C. 2007. Influence of stand-alone trees on epigeic spiders (Araneae) at the Alpine timberline. An. Zool. Fenn. 44(11):43–57.
Hatley, C.L. and Macmahon, J.A. 1980. Spider community organization: Seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environ. Entomol. 9: 632–639.
Heimer, S. and Nentwig W. 1991. Spinnen Mitteleuropas: ein Bes-timmungsbuch. Berlin, Hamburg, Parey. p. 543.
Hendrickx, F. and Maelfait, J.-P. 2003. Life cycle, reproductive patterns and their year to year variation in a field population of the wolf spider Pirata piraticus (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 31: 331–339.
Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN - A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and the attributes. Ithaka, Cornell University.
Hornschuch, F. and Riek, W. 2009. Bodenheterogenität als Indikator von Naturnähe? 2. Biotische und abiotische Diversität in Natur-und Wirtschaftswäldern Brandenburgs und Nordwest-Polens. Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung Naturschutz und 7: 55–82. http://afsv.de/download/literatur/waldoekologie-online/waldoekologie-online_heft-7-3.pdf.
Huhta, V. 1971. Succession in the spider communities of the forest floor after clear-cutting and prescribed burning. An. Zool. Fenn. 8: 483–542.
Langellotto, G.A. and Denno, R.F. 2004. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analyti-cal synthesis. Oecologia 139: 1–10.
Legendre, P., Dale, M.R.T., Fortin, M.-J., Gurevitch, J., Hohn, M. and Myers, D. 2002. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25: 601–615.
Leibold, M.A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J.M., Hoopes, M.F., Holt, R.D., Shurin, J.B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M. and Gonzalez, A. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 601–613.
Lensing, J.R., Todd, S. and Wise, D.H. 2005. The impact of altered precipitation on spatial stratification and activity-densities of springtails (Collembola) and spiders (Araneae). Ecol. Entomol. 30: 194–200.
Leps, J. and Smilauer, P. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Majunke, C., Böhme, R. and Haffelder, M. 1999. Entwicklung eines standartisierten Verfahrens zur gesicherten überregionalen Prognose von Massenvermehrungen der bestandesbedrohenden Schadinsekten an Kiefer als Bestandteil eines integrierten Bekämpfungskonzeptes. (final report unpubl. BMBF: AZ 514-33.64/94HSO19).
Marc, P., Canard, A. and Ysnel, F. 1999. Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 229–273.
Marshall, S.D. and Rypstra, A.L. 1999. Spider competition in structurally simple ecosystems. J. Arachnol. 27:343–350.
Martin, D. 1991. Zur Autökologie der Spinnen (Arachnida: Araneae) I. Charakteristik der Habitatausstattung und Präferenzverhalten epigäischer Spinnenarten. Arachnol. Mitt. 1: 5–26.
Maurer, R. and Hänggi, A. 1990. Katalog der Schweizerischen Spin-nen. Doc. Faun. Helv. 12: 6–31.
McArdle, B.H. and Anderson, M.J. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82: 290–297.
McNett, B.J. and Rypstra, A.L. 2000. Habitat selection in a large orb-weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 423–432.
Menyailo, O.V., Hungate, B.A. and Zech, W. 2002. The effect of single tree species on soil microbial activities related to C and N cycling in the Siberian artificial afforestation experiment. Plant Soil 242: 183–196.
Mühlenberg, M. 1989. Freilandökologie. Heidelberg, Wiesbaden, Quelle & Meyer Verlag. p. 511.
Nadkarni, N.M. and Parker, G.G. 1994. A profile of forest canopy science and scientists-who we are. Selbyana 15(2):38–50.
Nentwig, W. 1982. Epigeic spiders, their potential prey and competitors: Relationship between size and frequency. Oecologia 55: 130–136.
Nentwig, W. 1987. The prey of spiders. In: Nentwig, W. (ed.), Eco-physiology of Spiders. Springer Berlin. pp. 249–263.
Nentwig, W., Hänggi, A., Kropf, C. and Blick, T. 2003. Spinnen Mitteleuropas/Central European Spiders. An internet identification key. http://www.araneae.unibe.ch. Version 03.2003.
Niemelä, J. 1996. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Con-serv. Biol. 11: 601–610.
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y. and Punttila, P. 1996. The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Eco-graphy 19: 352–368.
Nyffeler, M. 1999. Prey selection of spiders in the field. J. Arachnol. 27: 317–324.
Oxbrough, A.G., Gittings, T., O’Halloran, J., Giller, P.A. and Smith, G.F. 2005. Structural indicator of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. For. Ecol. Manage. 212: 171–183.
Parker, G.G., O’Neil, J.P. and Higman, D. 1989. Vertical profile and canopy organization in a mixed deciduous forest. Vegetatio 85: 1–11.
Pearce, J.L., Venier, L., Pedlar, J. and Mc Kenney 2005. Habitat islands, forest edge and spring-active invertebrate assemblages. Biol. Conserv. 14: 2949–2969.
Platen, R., von Broen, B., Herrmann, A., Ratschker, U.M. and Sa-cher, P. 1999. Gesamtartenliste und Rote Liste der Webspinnen, Weberknechte und Pseudoskorpione des Landes Brandenburg (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones) mit Anga-ben zur Häufigkeit und Ökologie. – Naturschutz und Land-schaftspflege in Brandenburg, 8 (2). Beiheft: 1–79.
Platnick, N.I. 2011. The World Spider Catalog, Version 12. http://re-search.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/.
Prescott, C.E. 2002. The influence of forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiology 22: 1193–1200.
Reynolds, B.C. and Crossley, D.A. 1997. Spatial variation in her-bivory by forest canopy arthropods along an elevation gradient. Environ. Entomol. 26(6):1232–1239.
Riechert, S.E. and Gillespie, R. 1986. Habitat choice and utilization in web building spiders. In: W. Shear (ed.), Spiders: Webs, Be-havour, and Evolution. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. pp. 23–49.
Roberts, M.J. 1985. The Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 1 – Atypae to Theridioso matisae. Harley Books, Colchester.
Roberts, M.J. 1987. The Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 2 - Linyphiidae. Harley Books, Colchester.
Roberts, M.J. 1998. Spinnen gids. Tirion Uitgevers BV, Baarn.
Scheffer, F. and Schachtschnabel, P. 1992. Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. 13. Aufl., Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. p. 593.
Scheu, S. and Poser, G. 1996. The soil macrofauna (Diplopoda, Isopoda, Lumbricidae and Chilopoda) near tree trunks in a beechwood on limestone: indications for stemflow induced changes in community structure. Appl. Soil Ecol. 3: 115–125.
Schowalter, T.D., Hargrove, W.W., and Crossley, D.A. 1986. Her-bivory in forested ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ent. 31: 177–196.
Schwerdtfeger, F. 1949. Kampf dem Kiefernspinner. Einführung in die Lebensweise und Bekämpfung des Kiefernspinners (Den-drolimus pini L.). Neumann, Radebeul und Berlin.
Shultz, B.J., Lensing, J.R. and Wise, D.H. 2006. Effects of altered precipitation and wolf spiders on the density and activity of forest-floor Collembola. Pedobiologia 50: 43–50.
Spence, J.R. and Niemelä, J.K. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. Can. Entomol. 126: 881–894.
Sunderland, K. and Samu, F. 2000. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Ent. Exp. Appl. 95: 1–13.
Symstad, A.J., Siemann, E. and Haarstad, J. 2000. An experimental test of the effect of plant functional group diversity on arthropod diversity. Oikos 89: 243–253.
Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P. 1997. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton Univ. Press.
Toft, S. and Wise, D.H. 1999. Growth, development, and of a gener-alist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119: 191–197.
Wagner, J.D. and Wise, D.H. 1997. Influence of prey availability and conspecifics on patch quality for a cannibalistic forager: laboratory experiments with the wolf spider Schizocosa. Oecologia 109: 474–482.
Wagner, J.D., Toft, S. and Wise, D.H. 2003. Spatial stratification in litter depth by forest-floor spiders. J. Archnol. 31: 28–39.
Waltz, A.M. and Whitham, T.G. 1997. Plant development affects arthropod communities: opposing impacts of species removal. Ecology 78: 2133–2144.
Wise, D.H. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Wiehle, H. 1956. Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea (Araneae). Linyphiidae–Baldachinspinnen. In: Dahl, M., Bischoff, H. (eds.), Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meer-esteile, 44. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
Wiehle, H. 1960. Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea. (Araneae), XI: Mi-cryphantidae – Zwergspinnen. In: Dahl, M., H. Bishoff (eds.), Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile, 44. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
Ziesche, T.M. and Roth, M. 2008. Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: What makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 738–752.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ziesche, T.M., Roth, M. Microhabitat heterogeneity in temperate forests: is distance to stems affecting ground-dwelling spider communities?. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14, 8–17 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.2