Abstract
Different types of forest use significantly changed the structure and species composition of European temperate forests. Herbaceous species and seedlings are important parts of the forest ecosystem, thus it is necessary to understand the effects of stand characteristics on the species composition of the understory. In our study we assessed the main factors that affect the species composition of herb and tree seedling assemblages in Quercus petraea and Q. cerris dominated stands (age 50–150 years) in the Bükk Mountains, Hungary. The relationship between the studied assemblages and explanatory variables (tree species composition, stand structure, canopy closure and topography) were explored by Redundancy Analysis (RDA). The occurrence of herbaceous species was affected by canopy closure, stand structure (mean DBH and DBHcv of trees), topography and the density and diversity of shrub layers. Oak forest species were associated with more open stands with sparsely distributed large trees, while mesic forest species were positively associated with heterogeneous stand structure, low shrub density, and western exposure. Seedlings of trees and shrubs showed a dispersal limited phenomenon. The composition of seedlings was significantly influenced by the mean DBH of trees, the structural heterogeneity of the overstory, the tree species diversity and the density of shrub layers. However the seedlings of both dominant oak species required the same stand structure, sessile oak was able to regenerate almost exclusively in those stands where it was dominant in the overstory, which is significant for the management of the species. Generally, forest management affects species composition and structure of the overstory, accordingly it had direct and indirect effects on the understory community as well.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- DBH:
-
Diameter at breast height.
References
ÁESZ (Hungarian Forest Service). 2008. Magyarország erdőál-lományai, 2006. Hungarian Forest Service, Budapest, http://www.nebih.gov.hu/erdeszet_cd/index.htm
Barbier, S., F. Gosselin and P. Balandrier. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved – A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 254: 1–15.
Bengtsson, J., S. G. Nilsson, A. Franc and P. Menozzi. 2000. Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 132: 39–50.
Borhidi, A., B. Kevey and G. Lendvay. 2012. Plant Communities of Hungary. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Bölöni, J., Zs. Molnár, M. Biró and F. Horváth. 2008. Distribution of the (semi-) natural habitats in Hungary II. Woodlands and shrublands. Acta Bot. Hung. 50 (suppl.): 107–148.
Bölöni, J., G. Fekete, A. Kun, G. Tímár, D. Bartha, F. Szmorad, J. Nagy and M. Juhász. 2011. L2a – Cseres-kocsánytalan tölgye-sek. In: Bölöni, J., Molnár, Zs. and Kun, A. (eds.): Magyar-ország élőhelyei. Vegetációtípusok leírása és határozója, ÁNÉR 2011. MTA Ökológiai és Botanikai Kutatóintézete, Vácrátót, pp. 308–314.
Brunet, J., U. Falkengren-Grerup and G. Tyler. 1996. Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests – effects of management and soil acidity during one decade. Forest Ecol. Manag. 88: 259–272.
Burrascano, S., F. M. Sabatini and C. Blasi. 2011. Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning. Plant Ecol. 212: 829–841.
Chytrý, M. and L. Tichý. 2003. Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of vegetation classes and alliances of the Czech Republic: a statistical revision. Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Natu-ralium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis 108: 1–231.
Csapody, I., A. Horánszky, T. Pócs, T. Simon, I. Szodfridt and P. Tallós. 1962. Die ökologischen Artengruppen der Wälder Un-garns. Acta Agronomica 12: 209–232.
Decocq, G., M. Aubert, F. Dupont, J. Bardat, A. Wattez-Franger, R. Saguez, B. De Foucault, D. Alard and A. Deleis-Dusollier. 2005. Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate deciduous forest. Ann. Forest Sci. 62: 313–323.
Directive 92/43/EEC, 1992. Council Directive of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. – OJ L 206, 22.07.1992.
Dzwonko, Z. and S. Gawroński. 2002. Effect of litter removal on species richness and acidification of a mixed oak-pine woodland. Biol. Conserv. 106: 389–398.
Ford, W. M., R. H. Odom, P. E. Hale and B. R. Chapman. 2000. Stand age, stand characteristics, and landform effects on under-story herbaceous communities in southern Appalachian cove-hardwoods. Biol. Conserv. 93: 237–246.
Fredericksen, T. S., B. D. Ross, W. Hoffman, M. L. Morrison, J. Beyea, B. N. Johnson, M. B. Lester and E. Ross. 1999. Short-term understory plant community responses to timber-harvesting intensity on non-industrial private forestlands in Pennsylvania. Forest Ecol. Manag. 116: 129–139.
Gencsi, L. and R. Vancsura. 1992. Dendrológia. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest.
Graae, B. J. and V. S. Heskjaer. 1997. A comparison of understorey vegetation between untouched and managed deciduous forest in Denmark. Forest Ecol. Manag. 96: 111–123.
Härdtle , W., G. von Oheimb and C. Westphal. 2003. The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). Forest Ecol. Manag. 182: 327–338.
Hermy, M., O. Honnay, L. Firbank, C. Grashof-Bokdam and J. E. Lawesson. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol. Conserv. 91: 9–22.
Honnay, O., M. Hermy and P. Coppin. 1999. Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization. Forest Ecol. Manag. 115: 157–170.
Horn, H. S. 1971. The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Horváth, F. and A. Borhidi (eds.) 2002. A hazai erdőrezervátum-ku-tatás célja, stratégiája és módszerei. A KvVM Ter-mészetvédelmi Hivatalának tanulmánykötetei 8. Természet-Búvár, Budapest.
Horváth, F., K. Z. Dobolyi, T. Morschhauser, L. Lőkös, L. Karas and T. Szerdahelyi. 1995. FLÓRA Adatbázis 1.2. Taxon-lista és at-tribútum-állomány. Flóra Munkacsoport MTA Ökológiai és Bo-tanikai Kutatóintézete és MTM Növénytár, Vácrátót.
Ito, S., R. Nakayama and G. P. Buckley. 2004. Effects of previous land-use on plant species diversity in semi-natural and plantation forests in a warm-temperate region in southeastern Kyushu, Japan. Forest Ecol. Manag. 196: 213–225.
Kelemen, K., B. Mihók, L. Gálhidy and T. Standovár. 2012. Dynamic response of herbaceous vegetation to gap opening in a central European beech stand. Silva Fennica 46: 53–65.
Kirby, K. J. 1988. Changes in the ground flora under plantations on ancient woodland sites. Forestry 61: 317–338.
Kotroczó, Zs., Zs. Krakomperger, G. Koncz, M. Papp, D. B. Richard and J. A. Tóth. 2007. A Síkfőkúti cseres-tölgyes fafaj-össze- tételének és struktúrájának hosszú távú változása. Természet-védelmi Közlemények 13: 93–100.
Lemmon, R. E. 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstorey density. Forest Sci. 2: 314–320.
Maranón, T., R. Ajbilou, F. Ojeda and J. Arroyo. 1999. Biodiversity of woody species in oak woodlands of southern Spain and northern Morocco. Forest Ecol. Manag. 115: 147–156.
Mersich, I., T. Práger, P. Ambrózy, M. Hunkár and Z. Dunkel (eds.) 2002. Magyarország éghajlati atlasza. Országos meteorológiai Szolgálat, Budapest.
Pérez-Ramos, I. M., M. A. Zavala, T. Maranón, M. D. Díaz-Villa and F. Valladares. 2008. Dynamics of understorey herbaceous plant diversity following shrub clearing of cork oak forests: a five-year study. Forest Ecol. Manag. 255: 3242–3253.
Podani, J. 2000. Introduction to the Exploration of Multivariate Biological Data. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rackham, O. 2000. The History of the Countryside: The Classic History of Britain’s Landscape, Flora and Fauna. Phoenix Press, New York.
Rogers, D. A., T. P. Rooney, D. Olson and D. M. Waller. 2008. Shifts in southern Wisconsin forest canopy and understory richness, composition and heterogenity. Ecology 89: 2482–2492.
Roleček, J. 2005. Vegetation types of dry-mesic oak forests in Slovakia. Preslia 77: 241–261.
Rubio, A., R. Gavilán and A. Escudero. 1999. Are soil characteristics and understorey composition controlled by forest management? Forest Ecol. Manag. 113: 191–200.
Schumann, M. E., A. S. White and J. W. Witham. 2003. The effects of harvest-created gaps on plant species diversity, composition and abundance in a Maine oak-pine forest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 176: 543–561.
Sharpe, F., D. C. Shaw, C. L. Rose, S. C. Sillett and A. B. Carey. 1996. The biologically significant attributes of forest canopies to small birds. Northwest Sci. 70: 86–93.
Simon, T. (ed.) 2000. A Magyarországi edényes flóra határozója. Harasztok-Virágos növények. Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
Ståhl, G., A. Ringvall and J. Fridman. 2001. Assessment of coarse woody debris – a methodological overview. Ecological Bulletins 49: 57–70.
Standovár, T., P. Ódor, R. Aszalós and L. Gálhidy. 2006. Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness. Community Ecol. 7: 199–209
Szabó, P. 2005. Woodland and Forests in Medieval Hungary. Ar-chaeopress, Oxford.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. Šmilauer. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Tinya, F., S. Márialigeti, I. Király, B. Németh and P. Ódor. 2009. The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in Őrség, Western Hungary. Plant Ecol. 204: 69–81.
Tobisch, T. and T. Standovár. 2005. A comparison of vegetation patterns in the tree and herb layers of a hardwood forest. Community Ecol. 6: 29–37.
Tutin, T. G., N. A. Burges, A. O. Chater, J. R. Edmondson, V. H. Heywood, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb. 1964–1993. Flora Europaea. Vols. 1–5 and Vol. 1, ed. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tybirk, K. and B. Strandberg. 1999. Oak forest development as a result of historical land-use patterns and present nitrogen deposition. Forest Ecol. Manag. 114: 97–106.
Van Calster, H., L. Baeten, K. Verheyen, D. L. Keersmaeker, S. Dekeyser, J. E. Rogister and M. Hermy. 2008. Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256: 519–528.
Van Wagner, C. E. 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Sci. 14: 20–26.
von Oheimb, G. and J. Brunet. 2007. Dalby Söderskog revisited: long-term vegetation changes in a south Swedish deciduous forest. Acta Oecol. 31: 229–242.
von Oheimb, G. and W. Härdtle. 2009. Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forest: impact on herb layer richness and composition. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 271–287.
Warren, W. G. and P. F. Olsen. 1964. A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste. Forest Sci. 10: 267–276.
Whigham, D. F. 2004. The ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 35: 583–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ádám, R., Ódor, P. & Bölöni, J. The effects of stand characteristics on the understory vegetation in Quercus petraea and Q. cerris dominated forests. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14, 101–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.11