Abstract
Among other objectives, forest inventories are aimed to identify ecological communities and to correlate community composition with environmental variables. The identification of different communities would require several forest inventories, each covering small sampling areas with relatively homogeneous environmental conditions. The multiple plot sampling method, traditionally used in local inventories of tropical forests, cannot assure such homogeneity, since even small sampling areas would show environmental heterogeneity influencing vegetation. In this paper we assessed the consequences of this heterogeneity for sampling by quantifying the variability of species abundance ranks for species sampled with 10 or more individuals in a set of plots covering a small sampling area. The species reference abundance ranks were obtained from a sample of 100 plots of 10 m x 10 m each randomly set in a sampling area of 6.5 ha in a tropical forest fragment (Southeastern Brazil). For each species we used resamplings (30 trials) to obtain the species abundance ranks in sub-samples, considering different sampling intensities (n = 25, 50 and 75 plots), and compared these ranks with the species reference rank (n = 100 plots). Then, we compared the species ranks in sub-samples of 50 plots (10.000 trials) with the reference rank and assessed the frequency and extent of rank displacements. Species rank was highly variable across resampling trials for the sampling intensities of n = 25 and n = 50, but decreased considerable with a sampling intensity of n = 75 plots. The mean rank variability and especially the maximum displacement raised significantly from the seventh most abundant species on, and some species occupied quite discrepant abundance ranks in up to 10% of the 10.000 resampling trials. This high internal variability of forest samples may impair the search for floristic patterns as scale lessens, say, to the meso-scale (1-100 km2). We discussed some possible ways to increase internal homogeneity of tropical forest samples with the multiple plot sampling method. Among these, objective entitation, based on an ancient phytosociological procedure, is suggested as the most appropriate for use on the hilly relieves of the Atlantic forest biome.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abella, S.R. and W.W. Covington. 2004. Monitoring an Arizona ponderosa pine restoration: Sampling efficiency and multivariate analysis of understory vegetation. Restoration Ecol. 12: 359–367.
Bormann, F.H. 1953. The statistical efficiency of sample plot size and shape in forest ecology. Ecology 34: 474–487.
Caiafa, A.N. and F.R. Martins. 2007. Taxonomic identification, sampling methods, and minimum size of the tree sampled implications and perspectives for studies in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Functional Ecosystems and Communities 1: 95–104.
Cain, S.A. and Castro, G.M.O. 1959. Manual of Vegetation Analysis. Harper, New York.
Cielo-Filho, R., M.A. Gneri & F.R. Martins. 2007. Position on slope, disturbance, and tree species coexistence in a Seasonal Semide-ciduous Forest in SE Brazil. Plant Ecol. 190: 189–203.
Cielo-Filho, R., M.A. Gneri and F.R. Martins. 2009. Sampling effort and factors influencing the precision of estimates of tree species abundance in a tropical forest stand. Phytocoenologia 39: 377–388.
Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York.
Daubenmire, R.F. 1968. Plant Communities: A Text Book of Plant Synecology. Harper and How, New York.
Goslee, S.C. 2006. Behavior of vegetation sampling methods in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Plant Ecol. 187: 203–212.
Gotelli, N.J. and G.L. Entsminger. 2001. EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear. http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.
Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford.
IBGE. 1992. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro.
Instituto Geológico. 1993. Subsídios do meio físico e geológico ao planejamento do Município de Campinas. Secretaria de Plane-jamento e Meio Ambiente, Prefeitura Municipal de Campinas, Campinas.
Ivanauskas, N.M., R. Monteiro and R.R. Rodrigues. 2000. Similaridade florística entre áreas de Floresta Atlântica no estado de São Paulo. Brazilian J. Ecol. 2: 71–81.
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Science B.V., New York.
Lindsey, A.A., J.D. Barton and R. Miles. 1958. Field efficiency of forest sampling methods. Ecology 39: 428–444.
Lynch, A.M. 2003. Comparison of fixed area plot designs for estimating stand characteristics and western spruce budworm damage in southwestern U.S.A. forests. Can. J. Forest Res.33: 1245–1255.
Magnusson, W.E., A.P. Lima, R. Luizão, F. Luizão, F.R.C. Costa, C.V. de Castilho and V.F. Kinupp. 2005. RAPELD: A modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites. Biota Neotropica 5(2): 1–6 http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n2/pt/abstract?point-of-view+bn01005022005.
Magurran, A.E. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
Martins, F.R. 1993. Estrutura de uma Floresta Mesófila. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
Martins, F.R. and R. Cielo-Filho. 2007. RDSA: Rank and diversity stability analysis. Manual do Usuário v. 1. CONPEC - Univer-sidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
McCune, B. and E.S. Menges. 1986. Quality of historical data on Midwestern old-growth forests. Amer. Midland Nat. 116: 163–172.
Morais, R. and M. Scheuber. 1997. Statistical precision in phytoso-ciological surveys. In: J. Imaña-Encinas and C. Kleinn (eds), Assessment and Monitoring of Forests in Tropical Dry Regions with Special Reference to Gallery Forests. Proceedings of the IUFRO Meeting on Assessment of Tropical Dry Forests, Brasília, pp. 135–145.
Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Oliveira, R. de J. 2006. Variação da composição florística e da diversidade alfa das florestas atlânticas do estado de São Paulo. Doctorate Thesis. State University of Campinas, Campinas.
Oliveira-Filho, A.T. and M.A.L. Fontes. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32: 793–810.
Ortolani, A.A., M.B.P. Camargo and M.J. Pedro-Junior. 1995. Normais climatológicas dos postos meteorológicos do Instituto Agronômico: 1. Centro Experimental de Campinas. Campinas Agronomic Institute Technical Bulletin 155.
Phillips, O.L., R.V. Martínez, P.N. Vargas, A.L. Monteagudo, M-E.C. Zans, W.G. Sánchez, A.P. Cruz, M. Timaná, M.Y. Halla and S. Rose. 2003. Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests. J. Tropical Ecol. 19: 629–645.
Prado, H. 2003. Solos do Brasil: gênese, morfologia, classificação, levantamento, manejo agrícola e geotécnico. 3a ed. Piracicaba: editora do autor.
Salis, S.M., G.J. Shepherd and C.A. Joly. 1995. Floristic comparison of mesophytic semideciduous forests of the interior of the state of São Paulo, Southeast Brazil. Vegetatio 119: 155–164.
Santin, D.A. 1999. A Vegetação remanescente do município de Campinas (SP): mapeamento, caracterização fisionômica e florística, visando à conservação. Doctorate Thesis. State University of Campinas, Campinas.
Scheaffer, R.L., W. Mendenhall and L. Ott. 1979. Elementary Survey Sampling. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass.
Scott, C.T. and J.H. Gove. 2002. Forest inventory. In: A.H. El-Shaarawi and W.W. Piegorsch (eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 814–820.
Scudeller, V.V., F.R Martins and G.J. Shepherd. 2001. Distribution and abundance of arboreal species in the Atlantic Ombrophilous Dense Forest in Southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 152: 185–199.
Silva, A.F. da and G.J. Shepherd 1986. Comparações florísticas entre algumas matas brasileiras utilizando análise de agrupamento. Braz. J. Bot. 9: 81–86.
Souza, V.C and Lorenzi, H. 2008. Botânica sistemática: guia ilustrado para a identificaçao dasfamílias de fanerógamas nativas e exóticas no Brasil, baseado em APG II. Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa.
Talvitie, M., O. Leino and M. Holopainen. 2006. Inventory of sparse forest populations using Adaptive Cluster Sampling. Silva Fennica 40: 101–108.
Torres, R.B., F.R. Martins and L.S. Kinoshita. 1997. Climate, soil and tree flora relationships in forests in the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. Braz. J. Bot. 20: 41–49.
van den Berg, E. and A.T. Oliveira-Filho. 2000. Composição florística e estrutura fitossociológica de uma floresta ripária em Itutinga, MG, e comparação com outras áreas. Braz. J. Bot. 23: 231–253.
van der Maarel E. 2005. Vegetation ecology ‒ an overview. In: van der Maarel, E. (ed), Vegetation Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 1–51.
Vormisto J., Svenning J.-C, Hall P. and Balslev H. 2004. Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin. J. Ecol. 92: 577–588.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Cielo-Filho, R., Gneri, M.A. & Martins, F.R. Sampling precision and variability of tree species abundance ranks in a semideciduous Atlantic forest fragment. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 12, 188–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.6