Abstract
Nematode communities are valuable bioindicators of soil disturbance induced by agricultural practices. We report the results of a short term experiment set on a field previously cultivated with shell beans, where different agricultural practices were applied, namely disinfection with chemicals or organic alternatives (neem, basil, marigold and clove oils). We provide a detailed description of the soil nematode community before and after the application of agricultural practices, in terms of trophic structure, nematode functional indices and diversity. We also employ network analysis techniques to analyze the structure of nematode assemblages on the basis of co-occurrence of genera in samples. Chemical disinfection had a direct lethal effect on all nematode genera reducing or even eliminating their populations, while organic amendments favored only the free living nematodes without affecting plant feeders. These differences were poorly reflected on changes of diversity and even less on those of nematode indices. Network analysis offered significant insights into the structural changes in the web of interactions among nematode genera. The network after chemical disinfection was smaller, poorly connected and almost entirely dependent on the dominant phytoparasite Paratylenchus. In the absence of chemicals, large and more complex networks were formed
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akhtar, M. 1998. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes by neem products in agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 7: 219–223.
Akhtar, M. 2000. Nematicidal potential of the neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Integr. Pest Manage. Rev. 5: 57–66.
Akhtar, M. and I. Mahmood. 1994. Potentiality of phytochemicals in nematode control: A review. Biores. Tech. 48: 189–201.
Akhtar, M. and I. Mahmood. 1996. Control of plant-parasitic nematodes with organic and inorganic amendments in agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 4: 243–247.
Akhtar, M. and A. Malik. 2000. Roles of organic soil amendments and soil organisms in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review. Biores. Tech. 74: 35–47.
Allesina, S., A. Bodini and M. Pascual. 2009. Functional links and robustness in food webs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 364: 1701–109.
Arshad, M.A., B. Lowery and B. Grossman. 1996. Physical tests for monitoring soil quality. In: J.W. Doran and A.J. Jones (eds.), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49, USA. pp. 123–141.
Bongers, T. 1990. The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83: 14–19.
Bongers, T. 1994. De nematoden van Nederland. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging, Utrecht.
Bongers, T. and M. Bongers. 1998. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10: 239–251.
Borgatti, S.P., G. Everett and L.C. Freeman. 1999. UCINET 5.0 version 1.00, Computer manual. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 54: 464–465.
Cao, Z.P., Y.L. Yu, D.C. Chen and R. Dawson. 2004. Impact of soil fumigation practices on soil nematodes and microbial biomass. Pedosphere 14: 387–393.
Collins, H.P., A. Alva, R.A. Boydston, R.L. Cochran, P.B. Hamm, A. McGuire and E. Riga. 2006. Soil microbial, fungal, and nematode responses to soil fumigation and cover crops under potato production. Biol. Fertil. Soils 42: 247–257.
Dover, K.E., R. McSorley and K.H. Wang. 2003. Marigolds as Cover Crops. Department of Entomology & Nematology, Univ. Florida, http://agroecology.ifas.ufl.edu/marigoldsbackground.htm.
Ettema, C.H. and T. Bongers. 1993. Characterization of nematode colonization and succession in disturbed soil using the Maturity Index. Biol. Fertil. Soils 16: 79–85.
Ferris, H. 2010. Form and function: Metabolic footprints of nematodes in the soil food web. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46: 97–104.
Ferris, H., Ô. Bongers and R.G.M. de Goede. 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18: 13–29.
Ferris, H. and M.M. Matute. 2003. Structural and functional succession in the nematode fauna of a soil food web. Appl. Soil Ecol. 23: 93–110.
Ferris, H., R.C. Venette and K.M. Scow. 2004. Soil management to enhance bacterivore and fungivore nematode populations and their nitrogen mineralization function. Appl. Soil Ecol. 25: 19–35.
Fiscus, D.A. and D.A. Neher. 2002. Distinguishing sensitivity of free-living soil nematode genera to physical and chemical disturbances. Ecol. Applic. 12: 565–575.
Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215–239.
Friedkin, N.E. 1991. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Am. J. Sociol. 96: 1478–1504.
Fu, S., D.C. Coleman, P.F. Hendrix and D.A. Crossley Jr. 2000. Responses of trophic groups of soil nematodes to residue application under conventional tillage and no-till regimes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32 (11–12): 1731–1741.
Fuller, M.M., A. Wanger and B.J. Enquist. 2008. Using network analysis to characterize forest structure. Nat. Resour. Model. 21: 225–247.
Giannakou, I.O. and D.G. Karpouzas. 2003. Evaluation of chemical and integrated strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in Greece. Pest Manag. Sci. 59: 883–892.
Gilreath, J.P., B.M. Santos, T.N. Motis, J.W. Noling, and J.M. Mirusso. 2005. Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and Cyperus control in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Crop Prot. 24: 903–908.
Hanneman, R.A. and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods: Centrality and power, Riverside CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, M.I. Haq and S.A. Anwar. 2007. Protective and curative effect of neem (Azadirachta indica) formulations on the development of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica in roots of tomato plants. Crop Prot. 26: 530–534.
Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, M. I. Haq and F. Shahina. 2007. Systemic and persistent effect of neem formulation and root-knot nema-tode and their storage life. Crop Prot. 26: 911–916.
Jordano, P., J. Bascompte and J.M. Olesen. 2006. The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: Waser, N.M. and Ollerton, J. (eds), Plant-pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 173–199.
Jothi, G., R.S. Babu and R.G. Rajendran. 2004. Management of root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus delattrei in crossandra using oil cakes. Biores. Technol. 93: 257–259.
Kapagianni, P.D., G. Boutsis, M.D. Argyropoulou, E.M. Papatheodorou. and G.P. Stamou. 2010. The network of interactions among soil quality variables and nematodes: short-term responses to disturbances induced by chemical and organic disinfection. Appl. Soil Ecol. 44: 67–74.
Lenz, R. and G. Eisenbeis. 2000. Short-term effects of different till-age in a sustainable farming system on nematode community structure. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31: 237–244.
Liphadzi, K.B., K. Al-Khatib, C.N. Bensch, P.W. Stahlman, S.J. Dille and T. Todd. 2005. Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate resistant cropping system. Weed Sci. 53: 536–545.
MacArthur, R. and R. Levins. 1967. The limiting similarity convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101(921): 377–385.
May, R.M. 2006. Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 394–399.
Mote, J.E. 2005. R&D ecology: using 2-mode network analysis to explore complexity in R&D environments. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 22: 93–111.
Neher, D.A. 1999. Nematode community in organically and conventionally managed agricultural soils. J. Nematol. 31: 142–154.
Newman, M.E.J. 2007. The mathematics of networks. In: The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Oka, Y., S. Nacar and E. Putievsky. 2000. Nematicidal activity of essentials oils and their components againts the root-knot nematode. Phytopathology 90: 710–715.
Pandey, R., A. Kalra, S. Tandon, N. Mehrotra, H.N. Singh and S. Kumar. 2000. Essential oil compounds as potent source of nematicidal compounds. J. Phytopathol. 148: 501–502.
Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie. 1979. An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J.F., G.P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taillie (eds), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland. pp. 3–27.
Pen-Mouratov, S. and Y. Steinberger. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamic heterogeneity of nematode abundance in a desert ecosystem. J. Nematol 37: 26–36.
Proulx, R.S., D.E.L. Promislow and P.C. Phillips. 2005. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 345–353.
Rahman, L., K.Y. Chan and D.P. Heenan. 2007. Impact of tillage, stubble management and crop rotation on nematode populations in a long-term field experiment. Soil Till. Res. 95: 110–119.
Rényi, A. 1961. On measures of entropy and information, In: Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol 1. University of California Press. pp. 547–561.
Ricotta, C. 2000. From theoretical ecology to statistical physics and back: Self similar landscape metrics as a synthesis of ecological diversity and geometrical complexity. Ecol. Model. 125: 245–253.
Sánchez-Moreno, S., H. Ninoshima, H. Ferris and L.E. Jackson. 2006. Linking soil properties and nematode community composition: effects of soil management on soil food webs. Nematology 8(5): 703–715.
s’Jacob, J.J. and J. van Bezooijen. 1984. A Manual for Practical Work in Nematology. Department of Nematology, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283–290.
Vokou, D. and S. Liotiri. 1999. Stimulation of soil microbial activity by essential oils. Chemecology 9: 41–45.
Wang, K.H., R. McSorley and N. Kokalis-Burelle. 2006. Effects of cover cropping, solarization, and soil fumigation on nematode communities. Plant Soil 286: 229–243.
Weiss, S. and A. Lowit. 2004. Metam Sodium/Metam Potassium: The HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document (RED), U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
Wey, T., D.I. Blumstein, W. Shen and F. Jordan. 2008. Social network analysis on animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Behav. 75: 333–344.
WWF-Greece. 2002. Society forthe Protection of Prespa(SPP), Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania (PPNEA), Macedonian Alliance for Prespa (MAP), Strategic action plan for the sustainable development of the Prespa Park, Ag. Germanos. www.medwet.org/prespa/publications/sapen. pdf.
Yeates, G.W. 2003. Nematodes as soil indicators: Functional and biodiversity aspects. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37: 199–210.
Yeates, G.W., S. Bamforths, D.J. Ross, R. Tatek and G.P. Sparling. 1991. Recolonisation of methyl bromide sterilised soils under four different field conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 11: 181–189.
Yeates, G.W., T.Bongers, R.G.M, de Goede, D.W. Freckman and S.S. Georgieva. 1993. Feeding habits in nematode families and genera - an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25(9): 315–331.
Yeates, G.W. and H. van der Meulen. 1996. Recolonization of methyl-bromide sterilized soils by plant and soil nematodes over 52 months. Biol. Fertil. Soils 21: 1–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Boutsis, G., Stamou, G.P. & Argyropoulou, M.D. Short term effects of soil disinfection with metham sodium and organic alternatives on nematode communities. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 12, 161–170 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.3